• Department of Gastroenterology; West China Hospital; West China Medical School; Sichuan University; Chengdu 610041; China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To evaluate the difference of oral sodium phosphate (NaP) and polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) in the aspects of cleansing efficacy, tolerance, and safety in clinical practice, so as to provide evidence for clinical practice.
Methods  A systematic review of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed according the handbook of the Cochrane Collaboration. RCTs were identified from The Cochrane Library(Issue1,2004) MEDLINE(1980-2004), EMBASE(1984-2004),and CBM(1978-2004).Handsearching was also performed .RCTs comparing the two methods were selected .Tow reviewers independently assessed the quality of included trials and extracted data independently .
Results  Eighteen trials involving 3668 patients were included .Sub-group analysis was performed. Nap tablet had higher rate of adequate cleansing quality (RR1.08,95%CI1.02 to 1.05,p=0.01).Two-day ,divided-dose oral Nap was superior in the rate of adequate cleansing quality (RR1.27,95%CI1.06 to 1.52,p=0.009). .The. rate of adequate cleansing quality in right colon of Nap was lower than PEG-ELS(RR0.79,95%CI 0.64 to 0.98,p=0.03).The rate of abdominal cramps (RR 0.84,95%CI 0.72 to 0.99),the rate of abdominal fullness (RR 0.48,95%CI 0.26 to 0.89),the rate of nausea (RR 0.65,95%CI 0.56 to 0.76)and the percentage of patients who didn’t finished their prescribed regimen (RR 0.23,95%CI0.14 to 0.36)in Nap group were lower (p lt;0.05).
Conclusions  Compared with PEG-ELS,Nap is superior in cleansing efficacy , patients’ tolerance ,safety and economy . It is possible to promote the use of Nap in clinical practice in China .

Citation: LI Yaodong,WANG Yiping,PAN Tao,TIAN Ling. Oral Sodium Phosphate versus Polyethylene Glycol-electrolyte Lavage Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2005, 05(7): 555-561. doi: Copy