• 1. Division of Health Services Quality Management; Chinese PLA General Hospital; Beijing 100853; China2. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center; West China Hospital of Sichuan University; Chengdu 6100413. Xiao Tang Shan Hospital of Chinese PLA; Beijing 102211;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To explore and establish a more precise and reasonable classification method which is suitable for clinical treatment and scientific research of SARS patients.
Methods  ① Establishing a computerized classification method: Analyzing the relationship between variable items on the front page of medical records and severity of disease; Identifying the variable items related to patient’s condition by stepwise identification analysis; Creating a function equation and computerized classification system. ② Comparing and analyzing the difference between computerized and clinical classifications regarding to the general condition of patients, clinical manifestations, laboratorial test results, prognosis, period of hospitalization and medical expenditure, etc.
Results  ① Clinical classification: general cases 642 (94.41%), critical cases 38 (5.59%); Computerized classification: type A 436 (64.12%), type C 237 (34.85%), type D 7 (1.03%), no type B. ② There were statistical significance among groups between two classifications regarding the items of general condition (age, cure rate, mortality and average length of hospitalization), total protein , Alb, BUN and medical expenditure. ③ Comparative analysis of the two classifications: 99.77% of type A cases (general type) by computerized classification were general cases by clinical classification; 97.36% of critical cases by clinical classification were type C amp;D by computerized classification.
Conclusions  The results are conformity between two classifications and the differences are analogical among thegroups. The statistical difference is significant between general and critical cases with the number of critical cases by computerized classification 6.42 times more than that by clinical classification; Compared with clinical classification, computerized classification has advantages that there is significant difference between the groups while no difference within the groups. With more critical cases and more objective and logic results, the compauterized classification is suitable for study and application in the fields of health service quality management, health economy management and pharmaceutical economics, etc.

Citation: DONG jun,CAO Xiutang,LIU Zhimin,XU Hongmin,LI Youping,SUN Xin,WANG Li,ZHOU Yachun. Computerized Classification Study on 680 Clinical Confirmed SARS Patients in Xiao Tang Shan Hospital. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2004, 04(5): 325-332. doi: Copy