• 1. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center; West China Hospital; Sichuan University; Chengdu 610041; China2. Chengdu Center for Disease Prevention and Control3. West China School of Medicine; Sichuan University4. Second Department of English; School of Foreign Languages; Sichuan University;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To provide evidence for the establishment and improvement of public health system in China by comparing national public health emergency system of some representative countries.
Methods  The principle and method of evidence-based science were applied to search and evaluate data from the official websites of China, United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. The performance of each country’s public health emergency response system in SARS prevention and control, as well as their organization structure and mechanism were compared. The existing problems and corresponding countermeasures were then put forward.
Results  Public health system showed the best performance was in US, UK and Australia. The responding mechanism of Singapore was highly admired by WHO. The organization structure of China was similar to that of developed countries, but its performance was far lagged behind because of insufficient financial support, poor management and inefficient operational mechanism.
Conclusions  The public health emergency response system in China needs to be reformed by giving priority to mechanism reinforcement. Different models should be taken into account regarding different regional situations in China.

Citation: SUN Ding,LI Youping,FENG Xixi,HUANG Kaisen,ZHONG ning,GAN Jin,ZHOU Rongle,WANG Xin,ZHENG Jing,YI Lan,ZENG Zheng,SHUI Hong,LIU Ting,YI Gang. A Comparative Study on National Public Health Emergency Response Systems Regarding Their Performance in SARS Prevention and Control. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2004, 04(6): 402-409. doi: Copy