• Departmen of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  The survival data of patients with colon cancer who were treated by laparoscopic-assisted surgery and open surgery three years after operation were analyzed and contrasted, which provided data to support the future treatment.
Methods  The 217 patients who were cured by laparoscopic-assisted surgery and 193 patients who were cured by open surgery were followed up, and the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, implantative, and survival were contrasted and analyzed.
Results  Three years after laparoscopic-assisted surgery and open surgery, the disease-free survival rate was 86.2% (187/217) and 85.5% (165/193), respectively, and the overall survival rate was 91.2% (198/217) and 92.7% (179/193), respectively, the difference between the two groups was not statistic significance(P>0.05). The differences of the rates of local recurrence, metastasis, and implantative between the two groups were not statistic significance(P>0.05).
Conclusions  Laparoscopic-assisted surgery is similar with open surgery in the rates of local recurrence, forward metastasis, and overall survival. So laparoscopic-assisted surgery is a safe and radical curative surgery.

Citation: YIN Hongzhuan,YAN Zhaopeng,SUN Wei,YIN Jianqiao,LIU Baolin,SU Qi,.. Short-Term Outcome Analysis of Laparoscopy-Assisted Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2012, 19(6): 646-648. doi: Copy