【Abstract】Objective Through using neoadjuvant chemotherapy of different circles combined colorectal cancer operations under multi-disciplinary team (MDT), we evaluate effective treatment strategies that suit to colorectal cancer patients in this country. Methods The retrospective study reviewed patients with colorectal cancer treated in general surgery department Ⅲ in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2006 to April 2007. According to the circle times of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patients were divided into single-circle group, double-circle group and triple-circle group. And comparing the difference of treatment time, effect index of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and operative results used these stratagies. Results The difference between the time from the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to the operation in three groups had no statistical significance (P gt;0.05), which were (5.64±2.00) d in single-circle group, (5.80±3.74) d in double-circle group, (6.22±2.76) d in triple-circle group. According to the treatment effects, CEA value decreased during pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in each groups (P lt;0.01). Subjective reception such as hemafecia, anal tenemus and defecation obstruction in double-circle group and triple-circle group were obviously improved than that in single-circle group (P lt;0.01). Evaluating the tumor condition, the ratio of CR and PR in double-circle group and triple-circle group was higher than that in single-circle group (P lt;0.01). According to the adverse effect, WBC value of double-circle group and triple-circle group decreased during pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, their difference had statistical significance (P lt;0.01). The difference of WBC pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in single-circle group decreased fewer than that in double-circle group and triple-circle group (P lt;0.01). Nausea and vomit response in triple-circle group were obviously more serious than that in single-circle group and double-circle group (P lt;0.01). But abdominal distention and diarrhea response had no difference among three groups (P gt;0.05). Through our survey, used different neoadjuvant chemotherapy circle, patients in single-circle group and double-circle group were completely accepted within full confidence; but receptance of strategy in triple-circle group was 66.7%(12/18). All operations were successful. The difference of postoperative aerofluxus time between single-circle group and double-circle group had statistical significance (P lt;0.05). The difference of postoperative intake time, between triple-circle group and single-circle group, between triple-circle group and double-circle group, had statistical significance (P lt;0.05). But wound recover time among three groups had no obvious difference (P gt;0.05). Conclusion Analyzing neoadjuvant chemotherapy circles, time between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and operation, treatment effect and operation results, it is a feasible and secure colorectal cancer multi-discipinary strategy for patients in West China that choose the treatment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with double-circle and short preparation time.
Citation: WANG Xiaodong,QIU Meng,LI Yalun,WANG Haiqing,LI Li. Different Circles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Colorectal Cancer Operation in Multi-Disciplinary Team. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2008, 15(3): 210-214. doi: Copy