Objective To evaluate the risk of management decision combined neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with operation for colorectal cancer by means of the colorectal cancer model of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI-CCM).
Methods One hundred and eighty-one eligible patients (102 male, 79 female, mean age 58.78 years), which were pathologically proved colorectal cancer in our ward from July to November 2007, involved 62 colonic and 119 rectal cancer. The enrollment were assigned into multi-disciplinary team (MDT) group (n=65) or non-MDT group (n=116), according to whether the MDT was adopted, and the operative risk was analyzed by ACPGBI-CCM.
Results The baseline characteristics of MDT and non-MDT group were coherent. The watershed of lower risk group (LRG) and higher risk group (HRG) was set as predictive mortality=2.07%. The time involving extraction of gastric, urethral and drainage tube, feeding, out-of-bed activity after operation in MDT group, whatever in LRG or HRG, were statistically earlier than those in non-MDT group (P<0.05). The resectable rate in LRG was statistically higher than that in HRG (P<0.05), and the proportion of Dukes staging was significantly different (P<0.05) between two groups; Moreover, predictive mortality in HRG was statistically higher than that in LRG (P<0.05), while actually there was no death in both groups.
Conclusion Dukes staging which is included as an indispensable option by ACPGBI-CCM is responsible for the lower predictive mortality in LRG.Hence, the value of ACPGBI-CCM used to asses the morbidity of complications within 30 days postoperatively would be warranted by further research. The postoperative risk evaluation can serve as a novel routine to comprehensively analyze the short-term safe in the MDT.
Citation: WANG Xiaodong,CAO Lin,L Donghao,QIU Meng,LI Li.. Risk Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Operation in Multi-Disciplinary Team. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2008, 15(9): 692-696. doi: Copy