Abstract： Objective To explore the impact of obesity on postoperative morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy. Methods Clinical data of 3 494 patients with pulmonary diseases who underwent pneumonectomy in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from September 2003 to December 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. All the 3 494 patients were divided into two groups according to the patients’ preoperative body mass index （BMI）. There were 3 340 patients in the non-obesity group （BMI＜28 kg/m2） including 2 502 males and 838 females with their average age of 61.9±10.7 years， and 154 patients in the obesity group （BMI≥28 kg/m2） including 87 males and 67 females with their average age of 59.7±9.6 years. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to analyze the impact of obesity （BMI≥28 kg/m2） on postoperative morbidity after pneumonectomy. Results There were a total of 26 cases of perioperative death， including 23 patients in the non-obesity group and 3 patients in the obesity group. There was no statistical difference in mortality between the two groups ［0.7% （23/3 340） vs. 1.9% （3/154）， P=0.118］. There was no statistical difference in any particular postoperative morbidity or incidence of pulmonary complications between the two groups （P＞0.05）. Other than pulmonary complications， the incidence of postoperative complication in other body systems of the obesity group was significant higher than that of the non-obesity group （P＜0.05）. The incidence of cerebrovascular accidents， myocardial infarction and acute renal failure of the obesity group was significant higher than those of the non-obesity group （P＜0.05）. Logistic regression showed that obesity （BMI≥28 kg/m2） was not an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity after pneumonectomy ［B=0.648， OR=1.911， 95% CI（0.711， 5.138），P=0.199］. Conclusion Obesity is not a significant risk factor of postoperative mortality or morbidity after pneumonectomy.
Objective To compare surgical outcomes of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection between operations at midnight and daytime. Methods From January 2004 to March 2013，195 patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection received surgical treatment in Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University （Nanjing Cardiovascular Disease Hospital）. Patients with identical or similar propensity scores were matched from 127 patients who underwent emergency operation at daytime and 68 patients who underwent emergency operation at midnight. A total of 58 pairs of matched patients which had the same or similar propensity score were selected in daytime surgery group （n=58，43 males and 15 females，47.7±14.6 years） and midnight surgery group （n=58，45 males and 13 females，48.3±14.6 years）. Operation time，postoperative chest drainage，mechanical ventilation time，postoperative incidence of dialysis and tracheostomy，length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality were compared between the daytime group and midnight group. Results A total of 58 pair of patients were matched in this study. There was no statistical difference in postoperative incidence of tracheostomy ［19.0% （11/58） vs. 6.9% （4/58），P=0.053］ or in-hospital mortality ［8.6% （5/58） vs. 6.9%（4/58），P=0.729］ between the midnight group and daytime group. Operation time （485.7±93.5 minutes vs. 428.5±123.3 minutes，P=0.048），postoperative chest drainage （979.5±235.7 ml vs. 756.6±185.9 ml，P=0.031），mechanical ventilation time （67.9±13.8 hours vs. 55.7±11.9 hours，P=0.025），postoperative incidence of dialysis ［17.2% （10/58） vs. 5.2%（3/58），P=0.039］ and length of ICU stay （89.4±16.2 hours vs. 74.8±12.5 hours，P=0.023） of the midnight group weresignificantly longer or higher than those of the daytime group. A total of 107 patients were followed up for 4-6 months after discharge. During follow-up，there was no late death. Among the 13 patients who required postoperative dialysis，12 patientsno longer needed regular dialysis. Conclusion Emergency operation at midnight does not increase in-hospital mortalitybut increase some postoperative morbidity in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Whether at midnight or daytime，better preoperative preparation and surgeons’ vigor are needed for timely surgical treatment for patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.
Abstract： Objective To evaluate the incidence and prognosis of postoperative acute kidney injury （AKI） in patients after cardiovascular surgery， and analyse the value of AKI criteria and classification using the Acute Kidney Injury Network （AKIN） definition to predict their in-hospital mortality. Methods A total of 1 056 adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery in Renji Hospital of School of Medicine， Shanghai Jiaotong University from Jan. 2004 to Jun. 2007 were included in this study. AKI criteria and classification under AKIN definition were used to evaluate the incidence and in-hospital mortality of AKI patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate preoperative， intraoperative， and postoperative risk factors related to AKI. Results Among the 1 056 patients， 328 patients（31.06%） had AKI. In-hospital mortality of AKI patients was significantly higher than that of non-AKI patients （11.59% vs. 0.69%， P＜0.05）. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that advanced age （OR=1.40 per decade）， preoperative hyperuricemia（OR=1.97）， preoperative left ventricular failure （OR=2.53）， combined CABG and valvular surgery （OR=2.79）， prolonged operation time （OR=1.43 per hour）， postoperative hypovolemia （OR=11.08） were independent risk factors of AKI after cardiovascular surgery. The area under the ROC curve of AKIN classification to predict in-hospital mortality was 0.865 （95% CI 0.801-0.929）. Conclusion Higher AKIN classification is related to higher in-hospital mortality after cardiovascular surgery. Advanced age， preoperative hyperuricemia， preoperative left ventricular failure， combined CABG and valvular surgery， prolonged operation time， postoperative hypovolemia are independent risk factors of AKI after cardiovascular surgery. AKIN classification can effectively predict in-hospital mortality in patients after cardiovascular surgery， which provides evidence to take effective preventive and interventive measures for high-risk patients as early as possible.