【摘要】 目的 评价α2受体激动剂是否可以降低七氟烷引起的小儿术后躁动的发生率。 方法 通过检索Medline、荷兰医学文摘、Cochrane临床试验数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库和中国期刊网全文数据库等数据库，收集可乐定或右美托咪啶对七氟烷引起的小儿术后躁动的预防作用的随机对照试验（randomized controlled trial，RCT），提取资料和评估方法学质量，采用Cochrane协作网RevMan 5.0软件进行Meta分析。 结果 最终纳入11个RCT，其中104例患儿预防性使用右美托咪啶，268例患儿使用可乐定，365例患儿使用安慰剂。Meta分析显示，可乐定组小儿术后躁动发生率的比值比（OR）为0.31，95%CI为（0.15，0.61）（P=0.000 8）；右美托咪啶组小儿术后躁动发生率的OR为0.16，95%CI为（0.08，0.31）（Plt;0.000 01）。 结论 α2受体激动剂可以显著降低七氟烷引起的小儿术后躁动的发生率。【Abstract】 Objective To determine whether alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists can decrease emergence agitation (EA) in pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods The Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM and CNKI were searched. All randomized controlled trials comparing clonidine or dexmedetomidine with other interventions in preventing emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia were retrieved. Study selection and assessment, data collection and analyses were undertaken. Meta-analysis was done using the Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eleven articles reached our inclusion criteria and were included in the Meta-analysis. A total of 104 children treated with dexmedetomidine, 268 children treated with clonidine, and 365 children treated with placebo were evaluated for the incidence of emergence agitation. The pooled odds ratio for the clonidine subgroup was 0.31, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.15-0.61 (P=0.000 8). The pooled odds ratio for the dexmedetomidine subgroup was 0.16, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.08-0.31 (Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists can significantly decrease the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia.
Abstract： Objective To observe myocardial protective effect of sevoflurane used in the whole process of cardiopulmonary bypass（CPB）. Methods A total of 150 patients older than 18 years who underwent cardiac surgery under CPB in Fu wai Hospital from January 2010 to November 2011 were enrolled in this double-blind and randomized controlled study. All the patients were randomly divided into three groups：Sevoflurane pretreatment group （Group A，n=50），whole-process Sevoflurane group （Group B，n=50），and whole-process intravenous anesthesia group （Group C，n=50）. Radial artery pressure and other hemodynamic parameters were continuously measured for all the patients. At following time points: CPB beginning （T1），aortic declamping （T2），3 hours after aortic declamping （T3），and 24 hours after aortic declamping （T4），serum concentrations of cardiac troponin I （cTnI） and other parameters were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay （ELISA）. Results There were 31 males and 19 females at age of 60.43±3.24 years in group A，28 males and 22 females at age of 59.88±4.12 years in group B，31 males and 19 females at age of 58.76±3.87 years. There was no statistical difference in mean arterial pressure （MAP），central venous pressure （CVP），pulmonary artery wedge pressure （PAWP） and heart rate （HR） at respective time points among the 3 groups （P＞0.05）. At T1 and T2，there was no statistical difference in cardiac index （CI） among the 3 groups （P＞0.05）. At T3，there was no statistical difference in CI between Group A and Group C（F=3.382，P=0.845），but CI of Group B was significantly higher than that of Group A and C（F=3.382，3.382； P=0.033，0.020）. At T4，CI of Group B was significantly higher than that of Group A and C （F=13.324，13.324； P=0.005，P=0.000），and CI of Group A was significantly higher than that of Group C （F=13.324，P=0.024）. At T1 and T2，there was no statistical difference in serum concentrations of creatinine kinase MB （CK-MB），cTnI，interleukin-6 （IL-6） and tumor necrosis factor alpha （TNF-α） among the 3 groups （P＞0.05）. At T3 and T4，serum concentrations of CK-MB，TNF-α，IL-6 and cTnI of Group C were significantly higher than those of Group A，and serum concentrations of CK-MB，TNF-α，IL-6 and cTnI of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B （F=531.616，5.410，3.5813，3.160，1.126，4.702，7.819，5.424，all P=0.000）. Conclusion Sevoflurane used in the whole process of CPB has definite myocardial protective effect which is ber than that of Sevoflurane pretreatment.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of sevoflurane versus ketamine in the anesthesia of child short period surgery. Methods Such databases as EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBMdisc, Ongoing Controlled Trial and Conference Articles were searched from their establishment to April 2011 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the quasi-RCTs. The quality of those studies meeting the inclusive criteria was assessed, the data were extracted and the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1.1 software. Results Ten studies involving 600 participants were included. Seven studies showed that the intraoperative heart rate of the sevoflurane group was lower than that of the ketamine group (MD= –11.85, 95%CI –16.47 to –7.23, Plt;0.000 01). Nine studies showed that the revival time of the sevoflurane group was shorter than that of the ketamine group (MD= –29.05, 95%CI –37.98 to –20.12, Plt;0.000 01). Three studies showed that the anesthesia induction time of the sevoflurane group was shorter than that of the ketamine group (MD= –208.45, 95%CI –359.22 to –57.68, P=0.007). Six studies showed that the influence on mean arterial pressure (MAP) had no significante difference (MD= –4.86, 95%CI –10.02 to 0.29, P=0.06). Meanwhile, seven studies showed that the adverse events of the sevoflurane group were fewer than those of the ketamine group (Peto OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.40, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion The results of this system review show that sevoflurane is more effective than ketamine with fewer adverse reactions, and it provides a new choice for clinical anesthesia for child short period surgery. However, ketamine is still the main drug in clinical anesthesia for the child short period surgery at present, so high quality studies are needed for further clinical researches.
目的 探讨右美托咪定对小儿七氟烷吸入麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响。 方法 选择2011年3月－2012年1月美国麻醉医师协会分级Ⅰ～Ⅱ级、年龄2～8岁、择期行疝囊高位结扎术和隐睾下降固定术患儿40例，随机分为2组，右美托咪定组（A组）和对照组（B组），两组患儿在年龄、体重、手术种类无明显差异。两组患儿均采用面罩8%七氟烷吸入麻醉诱导，开放静脉，给予盐酸戊乙奎醚0.1 mg/kg、顺式阿曲库铵0.15 mg/kg，插入喉罩，麻醉维持根据血压、心率及脑电双频指数调节吸入麻醉药浓度。A组静脉给予1 μg/kg右美托咪定，B组给予同等容量的生理盐水。入室至手术结束时连续观察收缩压、舒张压、心率、血氧饱和度，记录清醒时间、拔除喉罩时间，记录苏醒期并发症的发生数。记录入麻醉恢复室即刻（0 min）、15、30、60、90 min患儿疼痛和躁动评分。 结果 两组患儿在手术时间、清醒时间以及拔除喉罩时间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），A组术后入恢复室0、15、30 min疼痛评分和躁动评分均低于B组（P＜0.05），两组患儿围术期均未出现低血压和心动过缓。 结论 右美托咪定用于小儿七氟烷吸入麻醉能够增强术后镇痛，减少苏醒期躁动。
目的 观察七氟烷吸入复合骶管阻滞、基础麻醉复合骶管阻滞及单纯静脉全麻在小儿腹股沟区手术的应用。 方法 将2008年5月-2009年8月收治的90例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期手术患儿分为3组：Ⅰ组为七氟烷吸入复合骶管阻滞组，Ⅱ组为静脉麻醉复合骶管阻滞组，Ⅲ组为全凭静脉麻醉组。每组30例，观察3组麻醉效果。 结果 Ⅰ组患儿心率、平均动脉压、呼吸频率变化不明显，Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组患儿术中和术后心率、平均动脉压较术前升高（Plt;0.05），呼吸频率明显低于术前；Ⅲ组患儿苏醒时间明显延长，Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组患儿苏醒期并发症低于Ⅲ组，其中Ⅲ组患儿术后躁动与哭闹多见。 结论 七氟烷吸入复合骶管阻滞用于小儿腹股沟区手术，患儿易于接受，麻醉过程中呼吸循环功能稳定，苏醒快，清醒质量高，苏醒期不良反应少，是临床上值得推广的麻醉方法。
摘要:目的:定量测定50 %小儿在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度。方法:25例择期行四肢及体表手术的患儿,高流量吸入七氟烷诱导并以七氟烷和氧化亚氮维持麻醉,不使用肌肉松弛剂及静脉麻醉药物,手术结束后停止吸入氧化亚氮,并维持设定的七氟烷浓度10min后拔除喉罩。根据Dixon序贯法确定喉罩拔除时的七氟烷浓度,每0.1 Vol%七氟烷为1个增减单位。患儿未出现咳嗽、牙关紧闭、体动、屏气及喉痉挛则认为拔除喉罩平稳。结果:50 %小儿平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度(EC50)为1.22 Vol%(95 %的置信区间分别为0.99 Vol%～1.49 Vol%)。结论:在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下,3～8岁患儿喉罩满意拔除时呼气末七氟烷EC50值为1.22 Vol%。Abstract: Objective: To determine the concentration of sevoflurane where 50%( EC50 ) of the attempts to remove the laryngeal mask airway (LMA ) with the Teracainum Gel would be successful in children. Methods: Twentyfive nonpremedicated children, aged 38 years old, ASA physical status I, scheduled for extremities or peripherical surgery were enrolled in this study. General anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. After the surgery, the target concentration was maintained for at least 10 min, and then the LMA was removed. Each target concentration was predetermined by the Dixon’s upanddown method (with 0.1 Vol% as a step size), starting at 1.20 Vol% concentration of sevoflurane. A removal accomplished without coughing, teeth clenching, gross purposeful movement, breath holding or laryngospasm, during or within 1 min after removal was considered to be successful. Results:The concentration of sevoflurane to achieve successful LMA removal in 50% of children was 1.22 Vol% (95%CL, 0.99 Vol%1.49 Vol%). Conclusion: The EC50 value of sevoflurane for LMA smooth extubation in children aged 38 years old with teracainum gel was 1.22 Vol%.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of propofol as well as sevoflurane on the histamine release induced by mivacurium chloride. MethodsForty patients with American Sociaty of Anesthesiologists stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ scheduled to receive ear-nose-throat surgery between March and October 2012 were recruited and were randomly assigned into two groups:propofol group and sevoflurane group. Patients in the propofol group were induced with targeted intravenous infusion with propofol. Patients in the sevoflurane group was induced with sevoflurane. The blood specimen was prepared before mivacurium chloride (0.16 mg/kg) infusion (T0), 1 minute (T1), 3 minutes (T2), and 5 minutes (T3) after the infusion. Mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at corresponding time points. In addition, we recorded the symptoms of anaphylactic reaction such as skin erythema or bronchospasm. ResultsBoth MBP and HR decreased after anesthesia induction. However, there was no significant difference from that before the induction in both groups, and no difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). The concentration of histamine in both groups at T1 and T2 was significantly higher than that at T0 (P<0.05). The concentration of histamine in both groups at T4 was significantly higher than that at T0 (P<0.05). The concentration of histamine in the propofol group was higher than that in the sevoflurane group. No skin erythema or bronchospasm was found in any of the two groups. ConclusionMivacurium chloride at a dose of 0.16 mg/kg can be safely used in propofol anesthesia, as well as sevofluane anesthesia, with no clinically significant histamine release or adverse hemodynamic fluctuation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the safety of propofol versus sevoflurane for pediatric surgery. MethodsEMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CSCD, CNKI, WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about propofol versus sevoflurane for pediatric surgery from inception to January 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then metaanalysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsFifteen RCTs involving 1 065 children were included finally. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared with the sevoflurane group, the propofol group could reduce the incidence of emergence agitation (OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.34, P<0.000 01) and the incidence of postoperative vomiting (OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.51, P<0.000 01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in extubation time (MD=0.98, 95%CI -0.26 to 2.21, P=0.12), eye-opening time (MD=3.32, 95%CI -2.65 to 9.29, P=0.28) and postoperative analgesic requirements (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.23, P=0.16). ConclusionIn reducing the incidence of emergence agitation and postoperative vomiting, propofol is superior to sevoflurane, so propofol is safer than sevoflurane for children's surgery.