Objective To summarize and review the heterogeneity of bone marrow derived stem cells (BMDSCs) and its formation mechanism and significance, and to analyze the possible roles and mechanisms in intestinal epithel ial reconstruction. Methods The related l iterature about BMDSCs heterogeneity and its role in intestinal epithel ial repair was reviewed and analyzed. Results The heterogeneity of BMDSCs provided better explanations for its multi-potency. The probable mechanisms of BMDSCs to repair intestinal epithel ium included direct implantation into intestinal epithel ium, fusion between BMDSCs and intestinal stem cells, and promotion of injury microcirculation reconstruction. Conclusion BMDSCs have a bright future in gastrointestinal injury caused by inflammatory bowl disease and regeneration.
目的 探讨准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术（LASEK）后角膜上皮下雾状混浊（Haze）的形成原因及防治措施。 方法 2004年2月－2011年12月期间采用LASEK治疗近视患者345 例669 只眼，屈光度?3.50～?13.5 D，平均（?6.87 ± 2.92）D；散光?0.50～?4.00 D，平均（?1.83 ± 1.32）D 。根据患者术前屈光等效球镜度数分为：中度近视组（?3.50～?5.75 D）120只眼，高度近视组（?6.00～?8.75 D）288只眼，超高度近视组（?9.00～?13.50 D） 261只眼。应用综合措施防治Haze，术中用日夜配戴的高亲水性绷带型角膜接触镜覆盖保护角膜上皮瓣，术毕频点激素眼液4次，术后使用激素类联合非甾体类抗炎眼液及降眼压药、抗生素眼液；随访6～12个月，观察术后Haze的发生率，并按Fantes（1990）标准分级，分析相关原因。 结果 LASEK术后6个月时0.5级Haze发生率14.65%（98只眼），无1级Haze。各组0.5级Haze发生率分别为中度近视组2.5%（3只眼），高度近视组11.11%（32只眼），超高度近视组24.14%（63只眼）。 结论 LASEK术后Haze的发生与术眼的屈光度呈正比，与角膜上皮瓣的活性和完整性，术后紫外线照射等有关。术后采用激素类联合非甾体类抗炎眼液及降眼压药等综合防治措施，可减少、减轻Haze的发生，使LASEK技术更安全有效。
目的 探讨聚乙二醇滴眼液对准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术（LASEK）后角膜雾状混浊（haze）影响的临床研究。 方法 回顾性分析2009年3月－2010年3月行LASEK的患者45例90只眼的临床资料。患者屈光度（?4.68 ± 2.30）D（?1.75～?6.50 D），随机分为聚乙二醇滴眼液组（试验组）和对照组，术后定期随访观察两组角膜haze形成、角膜上皮愈合时间、视力恢复情况及屈光度。 结果 术后1、3、6个月，两组haze形成差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），试验组术后第1、3、5天角膜刺激症状明显轻于对照组（P＜0.05），上皮愈合速度较对照组更快（P＜0.05）。 结论 LASEK术后应用聚乙二醇滴眼液虽然能减轻术后患者角膜刺激症状,能促进角膜上皮更快愈合，但是不能减轻haze的形成。
【摘要】目的评价双氯芬酸钠滴眼液在准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)中的临床应用价值。方法2008年7月2009年3月行LASEK术患者80例160眼,屈光度范围-4.86D±2.15D(-1.25D～-6.50D),随机分为双氯芬酸钠滴眼液组(试验组)和对照组,对两组术后角膜刺激症状、上皮愈合情况进行对比观察和统计学分析。结果试验组术后第1、3天角膜刺激症状明显轻于对照组(P＜0.05),上皮愈合速度较对照组更快(P＜0.05)。结论在LASEK术中合理使用双氯芬酸钠滴眼液,可明显减轻术后患者角膜刺激症状,促进角膜上皮的更快愈合。
ObjectiveTo compare the half-year clinical efficacy of three different surgical root coverage methods including lateral sliding flap (LSF), subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) and acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADM). MethodsEighteen patients (24 teeth) with gingival recession treated in our hospital between December 2012 and July 2015 were selected and divided into three groups according to a certain sequence with 8 teeth in each group. The three groups of teeth were treated with LSF, CTG and ADM respectively. Gingival recession, probing depth and keratinized gingival width at both baseline and 6 months after surgery of all patients were recorded for inner- and inter-group comparison. ResultsAll three methods proved to be effective within 6 months with an awerage of 2.8-4.0 mm in decrease extent of gingival recession (P<0.01). LSF did not significantly change the probing depth (P>0.05) as the other two did (P<0.01). The differences among three surgical methods compared before and after surgery were all significant (P<0.05). ConclusionLSF, CTG and ADM are all effective surgical means for root coverage. Within 6 months, CTG presents better effects than ADM, and ADM better than LSF.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and subepithelial connective tissue flap (sCTG) on patients with gingival recession (GR).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy of ADM and sCTG on patients with GR from inception to August 11st, 2019. Two reviewers indepeudently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.1 software.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there were no significant differences in probing depth (PD) (MD3m=−0.04, 95%CI −0.18 to 0.11, P=0.63; MD6m=−0.01, 95%CI −0.13 to 0.12, P=0.90) and GR degree (MD3m=−0.10, 95%CI −0.37 to 0.18, P=0.48; MD6m=−0.02, 95%CI −0.33 to 0.29, P=0.89) in 3 and 6 months after operative between two groups. But the clinical attachment loss (CAL) in 3 months after operation (MD=0.33, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.66, P=0.05) and width of keratinized tissue (KTW) in 6 months after operation (MD=−0.48, 95%CI −0.76 to −0.20, P=0.000 7) of sCTG group were superior to ADM group, the differences were statistically significant.ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that there are no differences in PD and GR degree in 3 months and 6 months after operation between ADM and sCTG group. But the CAL in 3 months after operation and KTW in 6 months after operation of sCTG group is superior to ADM group. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.