west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "个性化护理" 3 results
  • 妊娠合并宫颈鳞状细胞癌患者的个性化护理一例

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 个性化护理干预对肝癌介入治疗患者的效果观察

    目的探讨个性化护理对行肝癌介入治疗患者的临床应用效果。 方法将2011年11月-2013年10月152例行肝癌介入治疗的患者,按收治时间分为对照组(68例)和试验组(84例)。对照组予以常规护理,试验组则给予个性化护理干预,比较评价两组患者术前焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、术后并发症的情况。 结果试验组SAS 评分[(52.3±20.8)分]低于对照组[(66.4±23.7)分],术后并发症的发生率(7.1%)低于对照组(42.6%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论个性化护理干预能有效缓解患者的焦虑状态,减少术后并发症,有助于提高介入治疗质量与护理水平。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The Influence of Personalized Nursing Intervention on Negative Emotions after Occupational Exposure for Nurses in the Emergency Department

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of personalized nursing intervention on the negative emotions after occupational exposure for nurses in the Emergency Department, in order to provide effective nursing intervention methods for relieving nurses' negative emotions after occupational exposure. MethodsTwenty nurses with occupational exposure between January and September 2013 were chosen to be the control group, and another 20 nurses with occupational exposure between October 2013 and October 2014 were designated as the personalized nursing group. The level of depression and anxiety was compared between the two groups by using the self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) on the exposure day and 5 weeks after the exposure. ResultsBefore intervention, SDS score of the control group was 0.65±0.04 and of the personalized nursing group was 0.63±0.05, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=0.59, P=0.44); SAS score of the control group was 51.98±6.77 and of the personalized nursing group was 50.73±10.03, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=0.37, P=0.70). After the intervention, personalized nursing group had lower scores of SDS and SAS than the control group. SDS score was 0.64±0.11 in the control group and 0.50±0.09 in the personalized nursing group with a significant difference (t=5.11, P < 0.01); SAS score was 49.53±9.49 in the control group and 42.66±9.53 in the personalized nursing group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.10, P < 0.01). ConclusionThe personalized nursing intervention can effectively alleviate negative emotions after occupational exposure for nurses in the Emergency Department.

    Release date:2016-10-28 02:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content