【摘要】 目的 探讨乳腺癌保乳切除加经乳腔镜清扫腋窝淋巴结的可行性和手术难点。 方法 将2007年2月－2011年2月行乳腺癌保乳切除手术的27例患者，分成乳腔镜腋窝清扫组（乳腔镜组）11例和常规腋窝清扫组（常规组）16例，比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术中清扫淋巴结数、术后引流时间及引流量等。 结果 手术时间:乳腔镜组（186.36±11.20） min，常规组（158.13±25.29） min，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.002）；术中出血量:乳腔镜组（61.82±51.54） mL，常规组（103.75±42.56） mL，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.030）；两组术中清扫淋巴结个数、术后引流时间、引流量比较，差异均无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）；随访1个月~4年，无一例发生肿瘤局部复发或戳孔转移。 结论 乳腺保乳切除加经乳腔镜清扫腋窝淋巴结可以安全应用于早期乳癌的保乳治疗，操作者需学习一定的手术技巧。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the feasibility and surgical difficulty of breast-conserving resection and endoscopy-assisted axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients. Methods Twenty-seven patients treated by breast-conserving surgery from February 2007 to February 2011 in our hospital were divided into endoscopy-assisted axillary lymph node dissection group (the EALND group, n=11) and conventional axillary lymph node dissection group (the CALND group, n=16). Then, we compared the operation time, intra-operative bleeding volume, number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative drainage time and amount between the two groups. Results The operation time was significantly longer in the EALND group than that in the CALND group [(186.36±11.20) vs. (158.13±25.29) minutes, P=0.002]. The intra-operative bleeding volume of the EALND group was significantly less than that of the CALND group [(61.82±51.54) vs. (103.75±42.56) mL, P=0.030]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative drainage time and amount. Follow-up was done for one month to four years, during which no local recurrence or trocar displacing occurred. Conclusion The breast-conserving resection and endoscopy-assisted axillary lymph node dissection can be safely used in early breast cancer patients, and surgical skills should be mastered in the study.
目的探讨乳腔镜手术治疗男性乳腺发育症的手术方法和安全性问题。 方法对我院自2010年2月至2011年3月期间收治的11例男性乳腺发育症患者用乳腔镜行单纯皮下腺体切除术。 结果11例手术均获成功，术后3～6 d拔除引流管，术后平均住院时间12.5 d； 术后发生皮下气肿3例，乳头部浅层缺血3例，无其他并发症。 结论乳腔镜手术治疗男性乳腺发育症能达到常规手术无法取得的美容效果，且较为安全。乳腔镜应用前景广阔。
目的 探讨乳腔镜辅助下早期乳腺癌保乳治疗的优越性。方法 乳腔镜辅助下行保乳术37例，术后均行乳腺和病灶区放射治疗，并按病理及受体情况给予相应的辅助化疗及内分泌治疗。结果 乳腔镜辅助下保乳术成功35例，2例术中因腋窝出血量多而转开放性手术。患者无明显手术并发症, 且美容效果良好。术后随访时间最长27个月, 中位随访时间为18 个月,无一例局部复发、远处转移和死亡。术后乳腺美容效果评估： 优、良者术后6个月为68.2%，术后1年为83.4%。结论 乳腔镜辅助下早期乳腺癌保乳术以不降低生存率、不增加复发率为原则，联合多学科有机配合及综合治疗为保证，具有创伤小、并发症少、外形美观、生存质量高等优点。
Objective To investigate effect of optimizing operation procedure (OOP) on surgical outcomes of complete endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (CESM) in treatment of gynecomastia. Methods A total of 217 patients with gynecomastia underwent CESM from January 2014 to March 2017 in the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu were collected according to the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, further, based on a propensity score-matching model, a total of 94 patients were evenly assigned to OOP group (April 2015 later) and non-OOP group (before April 2015). The CESM with or without OOP was performed in the OOP group or the non-OOP group, respectively. The operative time, postoperative length of stay, treatment expenses, and favorable cosmetic effect were compared in these two groups. Results The differences in the general clinical data in both groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The operative time (min) was shorter (139.90±37.18versus 175.20±46.99, P=0.002), the postoperative length of stay (d) was shorter too (7.13±1.46 versus 8.47±2.71, P=0.021), and the treatment expenses (yuan) were more less (11 426.80±1 861.19 versus 12 315.75±1 306.64, P=0.036) in the OOP group as compared with the non-OOP group. Meanwhile the favorable cosmetic effect of the self-evaluation score in the OOP group was significantly higher than that in the non-OOP group (7.33±1.16 versus 5.97±1.16, P<0.05). Conclusion This study demonstrates that using optimizing standard CESM could shorten operative time, reduce treatment expenses, and improve satisfaction of patients.