Abstract:Objective To investigate clinical characteristics of patients with aortic valve disease and coronary artery disease （CAD）， and improve the pertinence of clinical management. Methods Clinical data of 78 patients who were older than 50 years and underwent isolated aortic valve replacement （AVR） in General Hospital of Shenyang Command from January to October 2010. All the patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had CAD：20 patients with CAD in the CAD group， including 19 males and 1 female with their average age of 64.6±8.3 years， and 58 patients without CAD in the control group， including 28 males and 30 females with their average age of 58.7±6.2 years. Clinical characteristics of AVR patients with CAD were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and multiple factor analysis. Results One-way analysis showed that the incidence of old age （P=0.000）， male patients （P=0.004）， diabetes （P=0.004）， aortic regurgitation （P=0.034）， valvular lesion （P=0.028）， and postoperative mechanical ventilation time （P=0.008）of CAD group patients were significantly higher or longer than those of control group patients. Multiple factor analysis showed that independent clinical characteristics of AVR patients with CAD included male patients， old age， prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation time， significantly decreased pulmonary arterial systolic pressure （PASP） at 6th postoperative month， and significant preoperative right ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Conclusion The screening age for possible CAD should be reasonably lowered if male patients with aortic valve disease have concomitant preoperative right ventricular diastolic dysfunction and/or tricuspid aortic valve degeneration. Patients undergoing isolated AVR need to take medications to reverse left ventricular remodeling for a long time to avoid severe arrhythmia.
ObjectiveTo investigate the restoration of left atrial function and its relationship with atrial fibrosis of patients after mitral valve replacement (MVR)and concomitant radiofrequency ablation (RFA)for atrial fibrillation (AF). MethodsClinical data of 32 patients with mitral valve disease and chronic AF who underwent surgical treatment in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command from January to August 2010 were retrospectively analyzed in this cohort study. There were 11 male and 21 female patients with their age of 49.8±8.7 years. There were 14 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS), 8 patients with rheumatic MS and mitral regurgitation, and 10 patients with mitral valve prolapse. Preoperative AF duration was 3.6±4.6 years. All the patients received MVR and concomitant RFA for AF. According to the cutting off extent of left atrial fibrosis (10.9%), all the 32 patients were divided into 2 groups. There were 19 patients with more severe left atrial fibrosis ( > 10.9%)in group A and 13 patients with milder left atrial fibrosis ( < 10.9%)in group B. Immunohistochemistry was performed to examined left atrial fibrosis, and echocardiography was performed to examined the structure and function of left atrium. ResultsThere was no perioperative death. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 84.6±22.6 minutes, aortic cross-clamping time was 47.6±15.6 minutes, and ICU stay was 3.2±1.5 days. All the 32 patients were followed up for longer than 6 months (1.3±0.6 years). The extent of left atrial fibrosis of the 32 patients was 4.8%-18.3% (10.7%±4.2%). There was no statistical difference in left atrial diameter (LAD), left atrial fractional area change (LAFAC)or mitral annular motion between group A and group B preoperatively and 3 months after surgery respectively (P > 0.05). At 6 month after surgery, LAD of group B was significantly smaller than that of group A (P < 0.05), late diastolic mitral annular velocity (Am)of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P < 0.05), and there was also some improvement in LAFAC of group B compared with group A (P=0.067). Among the 32 patients, 28 patients (87.5%)restored sinus rhythm (SR)3 months after surgery, and 21 patients (65.6%)maintained SR longer than 6 months after surgery. Patients in group B were more likely to maintain SR than patients in group A (P=0.010). ConclusionImprovement of left atrial function can be observed 6 month after MVR and concomitant RFA for AF, which is related to the extent of left atrial fibrosis.
Objective We probed how to predict left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients would be improved apparently after revascularization. Methods Between July 2010 and December 2015, 245 ICM patients (30%≤LVEF≤40%) with coronary bypass grafting (CABG) were retrospectively observed. Among them, 146 patients were accompanied by ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) (146/245, 59.6%), and 41 patients underwent mitral valvuloplasty or replacement because of more than moderate IMR. There were 13 patients early death, and other 232 patients who were followed up over 6 months were divided into two groups based on whether or not post-operative LVEF increased by 10%: a LVEF recovered group (group A, 124 patients) and a non-recovered group (group B, 108 patients). Results Preoperative NT-proBNP in the group A was significantly higher than that in the group B (P=0.036). There were less patients with myocardial infarction in the group A than that in the group B (P=0.047), and more with angina pectoris in the group A than that in the group B (P=0.024). There was no significant difference in the extent of mitral regurgitation or mitral surgery between the groups A and B (P>0.05). There were lower left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) in the group A than those in the group B (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative LVEDD dilated apparently and no angina pectoris existed before surgery were independent risk factors for LVEF with no recovery in the ICM patients (30%≤LVEF≤40%) after revascularization. The LVEDD of 245 patients (including 13 early deaths) was 41-71 mm. We found that the ICM patients with LVEDD ≥60 mm were more likely to signify the unfavourable prognosis (χ2=8.63, P=0.003, OR=2.21, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 3.91). Conclusion Preoperative LVEDD dilated and no angina pectoris before surgery are independent risk factors for LVEF with no recovery in the ICM patients (30%≤LVEF≤40%) after revascularization. LVEDD≥60 mm can be regarded as the preoperative forecasting factors for the unfavourable prognosis in the ICM patients (30%≤LVEF≤40%) after revascularization.
ObjectiveTo analyze factors affecting the recovery of postoperative left ventricular function in patients with valvular disease combined with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<40%].MethodsThe clinical data of 98 patients with valvular disease combined with HFrEF who underwent surgeries in our hospital from January 2011 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 75 males and 23 females aged 9-78 (55.3±11.9) years.ResultsA total of 15 patients were dead after the operation, including 4 deaths within 3 months and 11 mid-long-term deaths after the operation. Ninety-one patients were followed up for more than 6 months (10 months to 8.6 years). The postoperative cardiac function (NYHA) of 91 patients was classⅠ-Ⅱ, the LVEF of 18 (19.8%) patients increased more than 10%, that of 47 (51.6%) patients maintained at the preoperative level, and that of 26 (28.6%) patients decreased. Postoperative LVEF was more prone to recover in HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm before operation (P=0.038), valvular disease mainly in aortic valve (P=0.026), obvious reduction of left ventricular end diastolic diameter in early postoperative period (P=0.017), and higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) before operation (P=0.018). The risk factors for postoperative LVEF deterioration included large left atrium before operation (P=0.014), smaller left ventricle end systolic diameter before operation (P=0.003), and fast heart rate after operation (P=0.019). ConclusionMitral valve prolapse patients with obviously increased left ventricular diameter should receive operation as soon as possible. HFrEF patients with aortic valve disease should receive operation positively. The operation efficacy is satisfactory in the HFrEF patients with high SPAP.