【摘要】 目的 观察胎羊宫内心脏介入手术胎羊血气及血浆炎性细胞因子的变化。方法 8只怀孕双胎山羊,双胎之一为实验组,在相同麻醉条件下,实验组进行胎羊心脏介入治疗,并抽取血样标本。监测胎羊的心率、血气、乳酸值,运用ELISA法检测治疗组及对照组胎羊白介素(IL)1、IL6、IL8及肿瘤坏死因子(TNFα)。结果 2只胎羊因手术中发生心包填塞死亡,存活的6只胎羊手术前pH值较手术后有明显下降(Plt;005),手术前后乳酸浓度上升(Plt;005),PCO2、PO2差异无统计学意义(Pgt;005),手术前血浆IL1、IL6、IL8的浓度较手术后高(Plt;005),手术前后TNFα的浓度变化无统计学意义(Pgt;005)。结论 胎羊宫内心脏介入手术可引起胎羊血浆pH值下降,乳酸浓度上升,及细胞因子IL1、IL6、IL8浓度上升。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the change of blood gas and inflammatory cytokines during intrauterine cardiac intervention surgery on the fetal lambs. Methods Eight pregnant goats with two fetal in each goat were included. With the same anesthesia condition, one of the twin fetus was chose to perform the intrauterine cardiac intervention surgery. The fetal heart beating rate was monitored, and blood samples of the fetus were taken to do the blood gas analysis and to detect the concentration of inflammatory cytokines (IL1, IL6, IL8, and TNFα). Results Two of the eight fetal lambs which was died in the operation because of pericardial tapenade. In the other six survived fetus, the PH was lower than after the surgery, and the concentrations of lactic acid, IL1, IL6, and IL8 are higher than after the surgery. There was no significant difference of PCO2,PO2 and TNFα between before and after the surgery. Conclusion The intrauterine cardiac intervention surgery can make the PH of fetal plasma lower and the concentrations of lactic acid and IL1, IL6, IL8 higher.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of four antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stents by network meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the comparison of different antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stenting from inception to December 31st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Gemtc14.3 software, Stata16.0 software and RevMan5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs involving 45 837 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: in terms of prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) recurrence, the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was inferior to the triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=2.13, 95%CI 1.08 to 4.03). In terms of reducing the incidence of ischemic compound events, the triple antiplatelet therapy was superior to the standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.72), the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69) and the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.73). There was no statistically significant difference among the four interventions in reducing the rate of in-stent thrombosis and all-cause mortality (P>0.05). In terms of safety, the bleeding rate of aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.70, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.86) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.90), and the bleeding rate of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was also lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.65) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.67). The probability ranking diagram showed that: in terms of the recurrence rate of MI, the rate of in-stent thrombosis and the incidence of ischemic compound events, triple antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the highest. However, in terms of all-cause mortality and bleeding rate, aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and triple antiplatelet therapy was the highest.ConclusionsThe available evidence suggests that when the risk of ischemia is low, we should choose aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy, and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may have a lower risk of ischemia and bleeding. When the risk of ischemia is high and bleeding is low, the triple or standard dual antiplatelet therapy should be selected, and the efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy is superior, while the safety may be inferior.
ObjectiveTo investigate the morbidity of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients after transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). MethodsA prospective cohort study enrolled 19 patients who were diagnosed with severe or greater tricuspid regurgitation in West China Hospital from October 11, 2020 to March 1, 2021, and would receive TTVR using LuX-valve for valve replacement. The patients were divided into a PPCs group and a non-PPCs group according to the presence of PPCs. The incidence of PPCs after tricuspid valve intervention between the two groups was compared. ResultsOf 19 patients diagnosed with severe or greater tricuspid regurgitation registered in the database, 17 met the inclusion criteria, including 15 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 68.4±8.0 years. PPCs occurred in 9 of 17 (52.9%) patients. At discharge, compared with the non-PPCs group, the PPCs group had a longer postoperative hospital stay [11.0 (10.0, 17.0) d vs. 7.5 (7.0, 8.0) d, P=0.01], longer ICU stay [72.0 (45.5, 95.0) h vs. 20.5 (16.0, 22.8) h, P<0.01], and more hospital cost [74.3 (65.9, 98.3) thousand yuan vs. 52.6 (44.2, 57.4) thousand yuan, P<0.01]. At 30 days of follow-up, the PPCs group was found that the rate of New York Heart Association cardiac function≥class Ⅲ (66.7% vs. 12.5%, P<0.01) was higher, the six-minute walk distance (170.2±169.3 m vs. 377.9±80.5 m, P<0.01) was shorter and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire heart failure score (40.9±31.2 vs. 80.4±5.8, P<0.01) was less than those of the non-PPCs group. ConclusionPPCs are common in the patients undergoing TTVR and severely affect patients' cardiac function, exercise function and quality-of-life recovery. Proactive preoperative intervention as well as early postoperative rehabilitation management should be provided to those at high risk of PPCs.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with single-vessel disease of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Methods Databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2015), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were searched electronically from inception to Oct. 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about MIDCAB versus PCI for single-vessel disease of the LAD. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 10 RCTs including 1 489 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the PCI group, the MIDCAB group could significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative target vessel revascularization (OR=0.20，95%CI 0.13 to 2.29，P < 0.000 01), and the incidence of main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (OR=0.44, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.58, P < 0.000 01). No significant differences were found between the two groups in total case mortality (OR=1.23, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.83, P=0.31), cardiogenic death (OR=1.12, 95%CI 0.59 to 2.12, P=0.73), and the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction (OR=2.16, 95%CI 0.83 to 5.59, P=0.11). Conclusion In reducing the incidences of postoperative target vessels again revascularization and MACCE of patients with single-vessel disease of the LAD, MIDCAB is superior to PCI. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion still needs to be verified by carrying out more high-quality RCTs.
ObjectiveTo investigate the influencing factors of serum NT-proBNP level in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after PCI, and to analyze its predictive value for the short-term prognosis of patients. MethodsA total of 98 elderly patients with AMI in Zhengzhou central hospital from May 2020 to August 2022 were selected, all of whom underwent PCI. The level of serum NT-proBNP before and after PCI was detected. The level of serum NT-probNP after PCI was ≥125 pg/mL, and the level of serum NT-probNP after PCI was normal. Univariate analysis of the general data of the elevated NT-proBNP group and the normal group, Lasso regression model was used to screen the screening variables, and Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of serum NT-proBNP level in elderly AMI patients after PCI. The prognosis recovery of patients with different NT-proBNP and the level of NT-proBNP in patients with different prognosis were compared and analyzed. ROC curve was drawn to analyze the predictive value of NT-proBNP level in patients with short-term prognosis after PCI. ResultsLogistic regression analysis showed that the time from onset to PCI, age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke, number of stents implanted, no recirculation and stent diameter were the influencing factors of serum NT-proBNP level in elderly AMI patients after PCI. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was 21.43% (21/98) in 98 patients followed up 6 months after surgery, and the incidence of NT-proBNP increased group was 68.00% (17/25), which was significantly higher than that of normal group (5.48% (4/73) (P<0.05). The level of NT-proBNP in the group with MACE was significantly higher than that in the group without MACE (P<0.05). ROC curve showed that AUC was 0.813 (95%CI 0.721 to0.884), sensitivity and specificity were 80.95% and 79.22%, respectively, suggesting that serum NT-proBNP level after PCI had certain predictive value for short-term prognosis of patients. ConclusionSerum NT-proBNP level in elderly AMI patients after PCI has a good ability to predict the short-term prognosis of patients. Comprehensive consideration of the number of stents inserted, the presence of stroke, the presence of reflow and age and other factors to strengthen the monitoring of NT-proBNP level is helpful to prevent and control the occurrence of MACE, so as to improve the prognosis of patients.
Objective To formulate an individualized evidence-based treatment for a first-diagnosed patient with coronary artery-pulmonary artery fistula. Methods Aiming at the issue of whether interventional operation was necessary for first-diagnosed coronary artery-pulmonary artery fistula or not, the computer retrieval was conducted in the US National Guideline Clearinghouse, The Cochrane Library, PubMed and MEDLINE from 1990 to 2011, to collect and assess the best evidence of relevant systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and treatment guidelines, in order to be applied in clinical treatment. Results There were 1 clinical guideline for treating coronary artery fistula and 3 different high-quality evidence studies were retrieved. The results showed percutaneous coronary intervention was the best treatment currently. According to the obtained evidence and patient’s willingness, the relevant examinations were taken, and the preoperative preparation for percutaneous coronary intervention was done actively after the patient was admitted. Three days after hospitalization, the selective coronary angiography showed right coronary artery-pulmonary artery fistula and left coronary circumflexus artery-left atrial multiple fistulae, then the percutaneous coronary intervention spring coil embolization was successfully conducted for right coronary artery-pulmonary artery fistula. After operation, bayasprin enteric-coated tablets 0.1 g/d was taken for anti-platelet aggregation and preventing thrombotic diseases. The observation during operation and postoperative 5-day hospitalization showed no relevant complications. Conclusion Percutaneous coronary intervention is safe and effective for the symptomatic patients with coronary artery-pulmonary artery fistula.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary heart disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Methods A computer-based search in PubMed, The Cochrane Library and EMbase up to October 2017, together with reference screening, was performed to identify eligible clinical trials, cohort studies and case-control studies. The outcomes of this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization and stroke, and the effect sizes for them were presented as relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Fifteen cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials were finally included with a total of 11 985 patients, of whom 6 322 were in the CABG group and 5 663 in the PCI group. The result of meta-analysis showed that all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the CABG group than that in the PCI group (18.6% vs. 23.0%, RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.94, P<0.001). In addition, CABG was associated with a remarkably reduced risk of revascularization (RR=0.28, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.42, P<0.001) compared with PCI, with no significant difference in incidence of myocardial infarction (RR=0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.32, P=0.36) and stroke (RR=1.28, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.86, P=0.18). Conclusion CABG is superior to PCI in the treatment for patients with coronary heart disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Owing to the limited quality of included studies, additional large, randomized controlled trails are still required to confirm this finding.