west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "以问题为基础的教学模式" 2 results
  • 以问题为基础的教学模式下精细化教学方案在临床教学中的应用

    目的 探讨以问题为基础(problem-based learning,PBL)的教学模式下精细化教学方案在消化内科临床护理教学中的应用效果。 方法 选取 2013 年 7 月—2015 年 7 月在成都上锦南府医院消化内科实习的护理学生 136 名,采用随机数字表法将护生分为试验组(71 例)和对照组(65 例),试验组在 PBL 教学模式下精细化教学目标开展临床教学工作,对照组采用传统的方法带教,比较两种教学方式对临床教学质量的影响。 结果 试验组在理论成绩、操作技能方面 [(92.52±3.83)、(95.48±2.67)分] 优于对照组 [(88.72±2.66)、(91.45±2.95)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。且 PBL 教学模式下精细化教学目标的教学方法能培养学生的临床思维能力及学习主动性,提高护生的语言表达能力及解决实际问题的能力。 结论 PBL 教学模式下精细化教学方案,能有效提高护理教学质量。

    Release date:2017-08-22 11:25 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of problem-based learning combined with team-based learning methods in clinical probation teaching of bone tumor

    ObjectivesTo compare the role of problem-based learning (PBL) combined with team-based learning (TBL) methods with traditional lecture-based learning in the clinical probation teaching of bone tumor and explore which teaching method is more suitable for clinical probation teaching of bone tumor.MethodsThe 60 students of the 2013 grade five-year program medical students in West China Clinical College of Sichuan University who were undergoing clinical probation teaching in the orthopedic bone tumor subspecialty of West China Hospital of Sichuan University in April 2017 were randomly divided into 2 groups. The trial group adopted PBL combined with TBL teaching method, the control group adopted traditional teaching method. The general situation of the two groups of students were compared. After the end of the probation, the two groups of students’ knowledge mastery, comprehensive ability and satisfaction were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the gender composition and the assessment scores of the last semester diagnostics course of the two groups of students (P>0.05). After the probation, in terms of knowledge mastery, the trial group’s theoretical test scores (89.13±3.47 vs. 87.03±2.99; t=2.511, P=0.015), teacher evaluation (88.33±4.48 vs. 85.90±3.96; t=2.231, P=0.030) and student evaluation (89.83±2.97 vs. 87.47±2.91; t=3.117, P=0.003) were better than those of the control group. In terms of comprehensive ability, the trial group’s ability in reasoning and induction, information management, goal completion, and communication (17.90±1.09, 18.00±0.91, 18.00±1.02, 17.90±1.13) were better than those of the control group (17.20±1.13, 17.13±1.20, 17.10±1.24, 16.83±1.29), the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction between the two groups of students (P>0.05).ConclusionsPBL combined with TBL methods can improve the effect of clinical probation of bone tumors, deepen mastery of professional knowledge, improve comprehensive ability, and improve teaching quality.

    Release date:2020-11-25 07:18 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content