west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "低位直肠癌" 43 results
  • Present Status and Progress of Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Risk factors of liver metastasis after preoperative total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage

    Objective To investigate the risk factors of liver metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage after preoperative short course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. MethodsThe clinical data of 89 patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage admitted to the Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy before operation. The risk factors of postoperative liver metastasis were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. ResultsThe 89 patients were followed up for 7–53 months, with a median follow-up time of 33 months. During the follow-up period, 25 patients developed liver metastasis, the onset time was 7–35 months, and the median time of liver metastasis was 17 months. Among them, 5 patients (5.6%) developed liver metastasis in the first year after surgery, 15 patients (16.8%) developed liver metastasis at the second year after surgery, 5 patients (5.6%) developed liver metastasis at the 3rd year after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression results showed that lymph node metastasis [OR=3.550, 95%CI (1.425, 8.953), P=0.041], vascular invasion [OR=3.335, 95%CI (1.011, 11.001), P=0.048], maximum tumor diameter ≥5 cm [OR=4.477, 95%CI (1.273, 15.743), P=0.019], and peri-tumor diameter ≥1/2 [OR=4.633, 95%CI (1.387, 15.475), P=0.013] were risk factors for liver metastasis. ConclusionsLymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, maximum tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and circumferential tumor diameter ≥1/2 are risk factors for liver metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage after preoperative short course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

    Release date:2024-08-30 06:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Laparoscopic Ultra-Low Anterior Rectal Resection Combined with Per Anus Intersphincteric Rectal Dissection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer

    Objective To approach the curative effect of laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer. Methods Thirteen patients were prospectively studied from June 2005 to December 2007. There were 8 male and 5 female patients, with a mean age of 53 (range, 41-69) years. All the tumors located less than 5 cm above the anal verge. All the patients were treated with general anaesthesia and then went through the following procedures: lied the reverse Trendelenburg reforming lithotomy position, the laparoscope went inside the abdomen through two apertures, the hylus aperture (observing aperture) and the McBurney point aperture (main performing aperture). After the resection through the laparoscope, the operation was translocated to the perineal region, the anus was enlarged to expose the operation area. Results The operation on all cases succeeded, there was no operative mortality, and no stomal leak in all patients. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 30 months (mean 17 months). Up to now, one patient developed recurrence in pelvic cavity, and one suffered hepatic metastasis, there was no port-site implantation metastasis, 9 patients had satisfactory functional recovery of anus in the sixth month after operation. Conclusion The therapy laparoscopic rectum resection combined with per anus intersphincteric rectal dissection and colo-anal anastomosis for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer is a safe, minimally invasive, anal-preserving technique with reliablity in curative effect and satisfaction in anal sphincter function.

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Risk Factors Analysis of Anastomotic Fistula after Total Mesorectum Excision in Middle and Low Rectal Cancer

    ObjectiveTo investigate risk factors of anastomotic fistula after total mesorectum excision (TME) in middle and low rectal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 446 patients with middle and low rectal cancer received TME surgery from June 2004 to June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.Single-factor analysis of risk factors was used by χ2 test,multiple-factor analysis was used by logistic regression analysis. ResultsThere were 36 patients with anastomotic fistula in these 446 patients,which of 22 patients were recovered after conservative treatment,of 14 patients were recovered after colostomy.The results of single-factor analysis showed that the age>60 years,preoperative hemoglobin<110 g/L,preoperative albumin<35 g/L,accompanied with diabetes mellitus,neoadjuvant chemoradiation,distance from anasto-mosis to anus<5 cm,non-strengthen suture by hand were the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after TME in the middle and low rectal cancer (P<0.05).The results of multiple-factor analysis showed that the preoperative hemoglobin<110 g/L,preoperative albumin<35 g/L,accompanied with diabetes mellitus,neoadjuvant chemoradiation,and distance from anastomosis to anus<5 cm were the independent risk factors of anastomotic fistula after TME in the middle and low rectal cancer (P<0.05). ConclusionsRisk of anastomotic fistula after TME in middle and low rectal cancer is higher.Basic complications of patient and local conditions of anastomosis,and intraoperative factors could affect incidence of anastomotic fistula,it should be paid enough attention.In general,most of anastomotic fistula could be cured with conservative treatment,in case of conservative treatment is invalid,colostomy is feasible.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 凯途双吻合器在低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用

    目的 探讨凯途(CONTOUR)双吻合器在低位直肠癌前切除术中的应用价值。方法 对我院2007年3月至2012年2月期间46例低位直肠癌患者应用凯途双吻合器保肛的治疗经过进行回顾性分析。结果 本组46例患者均一次吻合成功,平均手术时间180min,术中平均出血315mL,吻合口距齿状线距离平均为2.5cm。术后发生吻合口出血1例(2.17%),吻合口漏2例(4.35%),术后直肠阴道瘘1例(2.17%),均经相应治疗而治愈。无吻合口狭窄及死亡病例。术后平均住院时间17.7d。术后平均随访1年均无局部复发及吻合口狭窄,无死亡病例。结论 凯途弧形切割缝合器在低位直肠癌保肛手术中有着较大的优势。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Experience of cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

    目的总结低位直肠癌采用柱状经腹会阴切除术(APR)的应用体会。 方法徐州医学院附属医院普通外科于2010年1月至2013年7月期间采用柱状APR治疗22例低位直肠癌患者(柱状APR组),并与同期行传统APR治疗的35例患者(传统APR组)进行对比,分析术中、术后和随访的各项指标。 结果与传统APR组比较,柱状APR组的环周切缘阳性率及术中穿孔率明显降低〔4.55%(1/22)比34.29%(12/35)和4.55%(1/22)比31.43%(11/35)〕,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访3~30个月(平均21个月),柱状APR组无肿瘤复发及远处转移患者,未见死亡病例;传统APR组出现盆底局部复发4例,远处转移3例,死亡2例。2组局部复发、远处转移及死亡率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论柱状APR可以切除更多的肿瘤周围组织,降低环周切缘阳性率,减少术中肠穿孔的发生,降低局部复发。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Cause analysis of colo-anal anastomosis stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy

    ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.

    Release date:2024-12-27 11:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Treatment for Male Patients with Low Rectal Cancer by Means of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision and Per Anum Rectal Pull-Type of Anastomosis

    Objective To study the effect of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and per anum rectal pull-type of anastomosis on male patients with low rectal cancer. Methods The successful experiences of anus saving operation on 23 male patients with low rectal cancer were summarized. Results A laparoscopic total mesorectal excision technique was used, with the full separation of the rectum at the bottom. After pulling out the distal rectum together with the cancer from the anus, the transection of the proximal tumor was performed. The end-to-end anastomosis of rectum and descending colon was performed by tubular stapler. Anus was reserved successfully in the 23 cases. There was no left-tumor stump after surgery detected by postoperative pathological examinations, no anastomotic leakage, and no operative death. Conclusions To the relatively narrow male pelvis, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and per anum rectal pull-through resection and anastomosis is safe and reliable for anus saving in low rectal cancer. It can simplify the operation, and raise the success rate of sphincter preserving in surgery of low rectal cancer.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Laparoscopic Assisted Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer (Report of 58Cases)

    目的 探讨腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛手术的可行性。方法 回顾性总结2004年9月至2007年10月期间行腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛手术58例患者的临床资料。结果 54例在腹腔镜下顺利完成手术,中转开腹4例,无手术死亡病例。平均手术时间187 min,术中平均失血110 ml,术后肛门排气时间平均为2.3 d。手术切除淋巴结平均为18.5个; 随访6~42个月(平均17.6个月)未见切口种植及吻合口复发。结论 腹腔镜超低位直肠癌保肛手术具有创伤小、术后恢复快等优点,可以取得比开腹手术更好的根治效果。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison of short-term effect between laparoscopic and open Miles operations for lower rectal carcinoma

    Objective To evaluate short-term effect of laparoscopic and open Miles operations for lower rectal carcinoma. Methods A total of 119 patients with lower rectal carcinoma were retrospectively collected from March 2012 to March 2017 in this hospital, among which 65 were in the laparoscopic operation group and 54 in the open operation group. The perioperative data, pathological results, recovery courses, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the open operation group, the laparoscopic group showed a longer operation time (t=6.035, P=0.002), quicker bowel function recovery (t=4.919, P<0.001), faster off-bed activity (t=2.221, P<0.001), and shorter hospital stay time (t=3.795, P=0.025). The intraoperative blood loss (t=0.154, P=0.698) and the number of harvested lymph nodes (t=0.532, P=0.595) were similar between the two groups. The laparoscopic operation group showed a significant lower total complication rate (χ2=7.174, P=0.009) as compared with the open operation group, but the incision infection, urinary tract injury, lung infection, thrombosis of lower extremities, etc. had no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.050). Conclusion Laparoscopic Miles operation improves postoperative recovery and reduces postoperative complications as compared with open approach in treatment of lower rectal cancer, with similar oncological and short-term results.

    Release date:2018-07-18 01:46 Export PDF Favorites Scan
5 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

Format

Content