Objective To analyze published literature about the clinical studies on elective single versus double embryo transfer using meta-analysis, so as to provide more convincing evidence for the clinical application of elective single embryo transfer. Methods We electronically searched foreign and domestic biomedical databases including PubMed, Ovid, EMbase, MEDLINE and CENTRAL, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on elective single versus double embryo transfer. According to Cochrane systematic review method, two reviewers independently screened studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 RCTs involving 2 784 cases were included, of which, 1 452 were in the trial group while the other 1 332 were in the control group. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, compared with elective double embryo transfer, during each transfer period elective single embryo transfer reduced the live birth rate (RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.59 to 0.73, Plt;0.000 01), multiple pregnancy rate (RR=0.05 95%CI 0.02 to 0.11, Plt;0.000 01), preterm birth rate (RR=0.39, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.60, Plt;0.000 1), and low birth weight rate (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.44, Plt;0.000 01). However, it had no effect on the ectopic pregnancy rate (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.11 to 2.77, P=0.47), miscarriage rate (RR=1.33, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.91, P=0.13), and neonatal mortality rate (RR=0.31, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.76, P=0.29). Conclusion Compared with elective double embryo transfer, during each transfer period elective single embryo transfer reduces the live birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate, and low birth weight rate. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the other indicators.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness of letrozole combined with GnRH antagonist for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in poor responders. Methods Such databases as VIP, CNKI, PubMed, EMbase and FMJS were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs on the effectiveness of letrozole combined with GnRH antagonist for IVF-ET. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Six studies involving 977 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, for IVF-ET poor responders, compared with the control group, the letrozole combined with GnRH antagonist group had less dosage of Gn (MD=–8.05, 95%CI –13.67 to –2.43, P=0.005), and lower serum E2 value on the day of HCG administration (MD= –1 026.41, 95%CI –1 949.61 to –103.20, P=0.03). However, no significant difference was found in the number of ocytes obtained (MD= –0.61, 95%CI –2.41 to –1.19, P=0.51) and clinical pregnancy rates (OR=1.03, 95%CI 0.53 to 2.02, P=0.92) between the two groups. Conclusion As for the effectiveness of impelling-ovulation treatment for IVF-ET in poor responders, letrozole combined with GnRH antagonist is similar to the control scheme in clinical outcomes, but it reduces the dosage of Gn and treatment costs of IVF-ET, which provides another clinical option for poor responders. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies as well as the difference in methodology, we suggest this above conclusion could be taken as a reference for clinical analysis which needs to be further evaluated in its effects.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist on vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Methods We searched CBMdisc (1979 to 2010), Wanfang (1994 to 2010), CNKI (1994 to 2010), VIP (1989 to 2010), PubMed (1997 to 2010), PML (1997 to 2010), FMJS (2000-2010), and 9 related journals to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparison between GnRH antagonist (GnRHA) and GnRH agonist (GnRHa). The quality of included trials was critically appraised. RevMan 4.2.7 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Six published RCTs involving 1 208 participants were included. Compared with the GnRHa group, stimulation duration in the GnRHA group was lower (WMD= –1.07, 95%CI –1.38 to –0.76), dose of gonadotrophins (Gns) in the GnRHA group was slightly lower (WMD= –0.49, 95%CI –1.63 to 0.66), endometrial thickness at the time of HCG administration was no significant difference in the two groups (WMD= –0.09, 95%CI –0.42 to 0.24), number of oocytes retrieved in the GnRHA group was lower (WMD= –1.80, 95%CI –2.48 to –1.12), OHSS rate in the GnRHA group was slightly lower (Peto OR= 0.77, 95%CI 0.35 to 1.72), pregnancy rate in the GnRHA group was slightly lower (Peto OR= 0.83, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.05), miscarraige rate as no significant difference in the two groups (Peto OR= 1.49, 95%CI 0.79 to 2.82). Conclusions Compared with GnRHa, GnRHA requires shorter stimulation duration and less Gn, less affected the pregnancy rate, and reduces the incidence of OHSS. The use of GnRHA in clinical practice is relatively flexible with good acceptability. GnRHA for the superovulation IVF-ET offers an alternative treatment. The above conclusion still needs more well-designed, multi-center, and large-scale RCTs to confirm and update.
目的 探讨3种不同助孕方案在≥40岁妇女体外受精-胚胎移植（IVF-ET）周期中的临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析2010年8月－2012年2月期间，于四川大学华西第二医院生殖中心行IVF-ET助孕、年龄≥40岁妇女共245个周期的临床资料，排除一侧卵巢缺如患者3例，余242个周期根据助孕方案不同分为3组：拮抗剂组（GnRH-A方案组）44个周期、长方案组109个周期及短方案组89个周期，比较3种方式助孕的临床效果。 结果 3组均无早发黄体生成素峰；长方案组应用促性腺激素（Gn）的时间最长，应用Gn数量最多，获得最高的获卵数及获胚数（P＜0.05）；3组的受精率、优胚率、冷冻胚胎数、周期取消率、卵巢过度刺激综合征发生率、早期流产率均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），短方案组的种植率及临床妊娠率最低（P＜0.05）。 结论 GnRH-a长方案在≥40岁妇女的IVF-ET周期中具有较好的临床结局，在≥40岁妇女IVF-ET周期中具有与长方案相似的结局，并且可以减少Gn使用量，提高卵泡及胚胎质量，短方案组对≥40岁妇女临床效果较差。
Objective To assess the necessity and effectiveness of salpingectomy before IVF-ET for hydrosalpinx among Chinese infertile patients. Methods The relevant papers published from 2000 to December of 2010 in China were electronically searched in CBM, VIP and CNKI to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving Chinese hydrosalpinx women with or without salpingectomy before IVF-ET. The quality of the included trials was independently assessed by two reviewers, and the data were extracted and analyzed by RevMan 5.0 software. Results Nine RCTs involving 687 patients and 730 IVF-ET cycles were identified. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) There were significant differences between the two groups in Gn dosage (WMD=1.23, 95%CI 0.17 to 2.30, P=0.02), fertilization rate (RR=1.07, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.13, P=0.006), cleavage rate (RR=1.05, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.09, P=0.03), clinical pregnancy rate (RR=1.92, 95%CI 1.41 to 2.61, Plt;0.000 1), and abortion rate (RR=0.34, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.86, P=0.002); and b) There were no significant differences between the two groups in days of Gn (WMD= –0.27, 95%CI –0.59 to 0.06, P=0.11), E2 in HCG day (WMD=59.15, 95%CI –9.61 to 127.91, P=0.09), number of eggs (WMD= –0.27, 95%CI –0.44 to 0.99, P=0.46), quality embryonic rate (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.14, P=0.79), and ectopic pregnancy rate (RR=0.22, 95%CI 0.03 to 1.82, P=0.16). Conclusion The current evidence shows that salpingectomy before IVF-ET for hydrosalpinx Chinese hydrosalpinx patients is necessary and effective. For the low quality of methodology of the included studies, more reasonably-designed and double-blind RCTs with large sample are required to provide more high-quality proof.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients.Methods Such databases as PubMed (1997 to 2010), PML (1997 to 2010), FMJS (2000 to 2010), CBMdisc (1979 to 2010), CNKI (1994 to 2010), VIP (1989 to 2010), WanFang (1994 to 2010), and duxiu scholar searcher (www.duxiu.com), and nine relevant Chinese journals were searched for retrieving the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) on the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist for IVF-ET in PCOS Patients. The studies were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria by two reviewers independently, the data was abstracted and the quality was evaluated. The RevMan 4.2.7 software was used for Meta-analyses. Results Six grade-B studies involving 699 participants were included. The results of Meta-analyses showed that, compared with the GnRH agonist, there was no significant difference in the GnRH antagonist group about the stimulation duration (WMD= –1.23, 95%CI –2.76 to –0.31), dose of gonadotrophins (Gns) (WMD= –4.87, 95%CI –14.20 to 4.46), serum E2 value on the day of HCG administration (WMD= 31.37, 95%CI –263.40 to 326), number of oocytes retrieved (WMD= 1.34, 95%CI –1.02 to 4.70), clinical pregnancy rate (OR= 1.27, 95%CI 0.77 to2.10), and miscarraige rate (Peto OR= 0.67, 95%CI 0.38 to1.18). But the OHSS rate in the GnRH antagonist group was lower with a significant difference (Peto OR= 0.35, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.50). Conclusions Compared with the GnRH agonist protocol, the GnRH antagonist protocol can obviously reduce the incidence of OHSS, but has the same effect in Gn dose, retrieving oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate. Because the GnRH antagonist can decrease the treatment duration and cost, and has better safety, so it may be an ideal choice for PCOS patients to have IVF-ET therapy. For the quality and quantity limitation, and the methodology difference of the included studies, it is suggested that the conclusion from this study should be only served as a reference of clinical analyses, and should be revaluated and updated unceasingly.
【摘要】 目的 观察提前去除卵丘细胞对胚胎质量的影响，进一步探讨其临床应用价值。 方法 将2009年7-9月行体外受精-胚胎移植治疗的患者随机分为两组，试验组共137个周期，于授精后5 h去除卵丘细胞；对照组共146个周期，于授精后16～18 h去除卵丘细胞。两组均于授精后16～18 h观察受精情况，72 h对胚胎进行评分，选择1～3枚优质胚胎进行胚胎移植。分别比较两组的年龄、不育年限、获卵数、受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、胚胎种植率和临床妊娠率。 结果 两组的优质胚胎率差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.01）；但年龄、不育年限、获卵数、受精率、卵裂率、胚胎种植率和临床妊娠率比较，差异均无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。 结论 体外受精中提前去除卵丘细胞优质胚胎增加，有助于提高临床累积妊娠率。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effect of denuding the oocyte granulose cells soon after fertilization in vitro (IVF). Methods A total of 283 IVF cycles in patients from July to September 2009 were divided into a trial group and a control group randomly. The trial group contained 137 cycles, being denuded the oocyte granulose cells only 5 hours after IVF. The controlled group contained 146 cycles, being denuded the oocyte granulose cell and observed the pronuclear 18 hours after IVF. The outcomes of female age, infertile duration, the number of oocyte, fertilization rate,abnormal fertilization rate, good quality embryo rate, and clinical pregnancy rate were measured. Results There was no difference in any of the outcomes between the two groups except for the high quality embryo rate (Plt;0.01). The clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the trial group without significant differences (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions Denuding the oocyte granulose cells soon after IVF helps to improve the embryo quality and the clinical accumulated pregnancy rate.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of different pituitary down regulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment. MethodsThe clinical data of 358 IVF cycles in women at 40 years old or younger from November 2012 to January 2013 in the West China Second University Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. All the 358 cycles were divided into two groups, according to whether the leading follicle diameter was <14 mm (group A, 158 cycles) or ≥14 mm (group B, 200 cycles) after discontinuing the GnRH-a. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsCompared with group B, the amount of gonadotropins used was significantly more, and the time of gonadotropin use was also significantly longer in group A (P<0.05). However, the serum level of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P) and Luteinizing hormone (LH), incidence of premature P rise, retrieved ovum number, the rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth did not significantly differ between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionDiscontinuing the use of GnRH-a in early stage of controlled ovarian stimulation can keep effective pituitary down regulation and it has the same optimal clinical outcomes in patients undergoing IVF-ET.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical effects of short-term and conventional fertilization for vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the clinical effects of short-term fertilization versus conventional fertilization for IVF-ET were searched in PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2014), CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to August 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of six RCTs involving 1 373 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that:short-term fertilization was superior to conventional fertilization in increasing high quality embryo rates (OR=1.42, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.70, P=0.000 2) as well as clinical pregnancy rates (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.33 to 2.09, P < 0.000 01). However, the two groups were alike in fertilization rates, polyspermy rates, and miscarriage rates. ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that short-term fertilization is superior to conventional fertilization in increasing high quality embryo rates as well as clinical pregnancy rates. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion should be verified by conducting more large-scale, high quality RCTs with long-term follow-up.