Objective To testify the efficacy of revised trauma score （RTS） in evaluating the severity of trunk injury，analyze its inadequacy and make modifications to improve its specificity and accuracy in evaluating trunk injury. Methods Medical records of 278 patients undergoing emergency surgery for the treatment of trunk injury in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2006 and June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 231 males and 47 females in the age of 1-75 （33.7±14.1） years. RTS was calculated for each patient. Hemoglobin （Hb） concentrations in these patients acquired at the emergency room were included to reflect the severity of blood loss. The correlations between RTS and patient response to treatment as well as RTS and prognosis were analyzed. Patient response to treatment and prognosis were compared between the normal RTS group and the abnormal RTS group. Univariate analysis was performed followed by multivariate analysis for the variables which may impact prognosis. Modified RTS was established by regression analysis. Results RTS was significantly correlated with patient response to treatment as well as prognosis. RTS was significantly correlated with the time duration between the onset of injury and the beginning of operation （r =0.249，P＜0.001）， thoracic and abdominal blood loss volume （r = -0.255，P＜0.001），fluid resuscitation volume （r = -0.244，P＜0.001） as well as length of ICU stay （r = -0.202，P=0.001）. Mortalities in patients with different RTS were statistically different （P=0.004）. In the patient group with normal RTS the mortality was 5.1%，which indicates the inadequacy of RTS in evaluating trunk injury. Univariate analysis revealed that both emergency room Hb and RTS were correlated with patients’ prognosis. After putting these two factors into the regression analysis，a new formula to calculate modified RTS is established：Logit （P death）=6.450-0.769×RTS-0.029×Emergency room Hb. Conclusion Modified RTS is more specific in evaluating trunk injury and maintains the advantages of simplicity and rapidness.
目的 探讨修正创伤评分（RTS）、CRAMS评分及院前伤情评分（PHI）对于群体伤患者死亡的评估作用。 方法 回顾性分析2011年8月－2012年8月就诊且记录完整的45例群体伤患者的病历资料，根据病历记录计算RTS、CRAMS及PHI评分，并记录患者是否死亡。绘制受试者工作特征曲线并计算出曲线下面积；根据约登指数筛选出各个评分适宜的截断值，据此计算3种创伤评分的灵敏度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、阳性预测值、阴性预测值并进行比较。将患者按照性别、年龄分为亚组进行对比分析。 结果 RTS曲线下面积最大，且与参考线下面积对比差异有统计学意义（P=0.016），与另外两种评分比较其差异有统计学意义。 结论 RTS较CRAMS及PHI评分对于群体伤患者死亡预测具有更高的价值。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of using hemoglobin-revised trauma score (HB-RTS) on predicting mortality risk in trunk injury patients. MethodsAccording to case control study rules, medical records of patients with trunk injury who were treated between July 2011 and October 2013, were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to their survival prognosis within 28 days. The HB-RTS, revised trauma score (RTS), and injury severity score (ISS) of the two groups were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) and Youden's index were calculated. And then, we selected the optimal cutoff value using HB-RTS and RTS to predict the trunk injury patients' mortality and calculated their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In the end, the correlation of ISS with HB-RTS and RTS using linear correlation analysis method was analyzed. ResultsBesides RTS, HB-RTS and ISS in the death group were statistically significant higher than that in the survival group. The AUC of HB-RTS and RTS of the two groups were 0.922 and 0.888, respectively. The sensitivity of HB-RTS and RTS were 91.5% and 83%; and the specificity of HB-RTS and RTS were 95.7% and 76.6%, respectively. The correlation of HB-RTS and ISS was -0.592, while the correlation of RTS and ISS was 0.585. ConclusionCompared to RTS, ROC of HB-RTS is enlarged, the specificity is increased, and the sensitivity is decreased. HB-RTS has stronger correlation with ISS than with RTS. The predictive effect of HB-RTS is higher than RTS in predicting mortality of trunk injury patients.