ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and short-term outcome of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for the middle-lower rectal cancer in municipal hospital.MethodsThe pathological data of 94 patients with middle-lower rectal cancer (49 cases underwent laparoscopic TME, while 45 cases received open TME), who treated in The First People’s Hospital of Ziyang from Jan. 2015 to Jun. 2017, were retrospectively collected and analyzed.ResultsTwo patients (4.1%) in laparoscopy group were converted to open surgery. Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had significantly less volume of intraoperative bleeding, shorter abdominal incision, earlier time to the first flatus and liquid diet, and lower rate of 30-day postoperative complication (P<0.05), but had longer operative time (P=0.033). While there were no significant difference on postoperative stay, the specimen length, distal margin, and number of harvested lymph nodes between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic TME is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive technique for middle-lower rectal cancer, and produce more favourable short-term outcome than open surgery in municipal hospital.
Objective To prospectively evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) with anal sphincter preservation (ASP) for low rectal cancers. Methods From June 2001 to March 2004, 125 patients undergoing LTME and 103 patients undergoing OTME were included in this study. The international standard questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38) were used to evaluate the conditions of patients at 3 periods after surgery respetively: 3-6 months, 12-18 months, gt;24 months. Results In contrast to OTME patients, the LTME ones showed significantly better physical function during 3-6 months after surgery, less micturition problems within 12-18 months, less male sexual problems and better sexual function during 12-18 months after surgery, with better sexual enjoyment after postoperative 24 months. Both groups showed significant improvement in most subscales from the first to the second assessment, and improvement in sexual enjoyment from the second to the third assessment. The sexual function, micturition problems and male sexual problems in LTME group significantly improved from the first to the second assessment, whereas the sexual function in OTME group improved from the second to the third assessment.Conclusion Patients undergoing LTME for low rectal cancers have bette postoperative HRQOL than patients undergoing OTME, with better physical function, micturition function, overall sexual and male sexual functions in short term, and better sexual enjoyment in the long term. The HRQOL of both LTME and OTME patients may be expected to improve over time, particularly in the first postoperative year.
After more than 10 years of development, transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) has played an important role in anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer. Existing studies have shown that taTME is not significantly different from traditional laparoscopy in the short-term and long-term efficacy of the treatment of low rectal cancer, and that taTME has potential advantages in postoperative functional recovery. With the maturity of taTME technology, transanal endoscopic approach has gradually been clinically applied to other rectal tumors, anastomotic stenosis, lateral lymph node dissection and other scenarios. Clinical practice shows that the transanal endoscopic approach can dissect pelvic tissues more accurately, greatly reduce the difficulty of surgery for complex pelvic diseases, improve the safety of surgery, and provide new ideas for clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo summarize the functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).MethodThe literatures about functional outcomes and existing problems secondary to TaTME in China and abroad were collected to make a review.ResultsNeither the TaTME or the laparoscopic TME (LTME) had few serious impact on the quality of life of patients. At present, only a few studies were involved in the postoperative sexual function, and no definite conclusion could be drawn. From the current data only, the TaTME had few serious impact on the sexual function and it didn’t show some advantages as compared with the LTME. The urinary and defecation functions showed no obvious differences between the TaTME and the LTME, which of the patients after the TaTME might be impaired to some extent. The defecation disorders mainly occurred in 1—6 months after the TaTME, but it would recover to a certain extent as time went on.ConclusionsAlthough TaTME has more advantages in protecting pelvic autonomic nerves, there is no obvious difference in postoperative organ function as compared with LTME surgery at present. Multi-center, large sample size, and long-term follow-up studies are still needed to validate long-term results.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for mid-to-lower rectal cancer and provide evidence for clinical decision-making. MethodsThe relevant literature from domestic and international databases in recent years was reviewed to systematically assess the current application of TaTME in the treatment of mid-to-low rectal cancer. A comparative analysis was conducted between the TaTME and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME), focusing on intraoperative outcomes, short-term postoperative recovery, intraoperative and postoperative complications, oncological prognosis, and the learning curve. ResultsConventional LapTME presented significant challenges in performing precise maneuvers within the pelvis and around the rectum, particularly in patients with “difficult pelvis” characteristics such as obesity, narrow pelvis, or male anatomy. In contrast, TaTME demonstrated certain advantages, including improved visualization of anatomical planes, reduced intraoperative bleeding, lower conversion rate to open surgery, faster short-term postoperative recovery, and enhanced specimen quality. ConclusionTaTME is a safe procedure with short-term outcomes, which is superior or comparable to those of laparoscopic surgery, offering a new surgical option for the treatment of mid-to-lower rectal cancer.
Objective To summarize the research progress of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. Methods The literatures about current status, limitations, and prospects of TaTME in China and abroad were collected to make an reviewe. Results TaTME is conformed to the principle of total mesorectal excision (TME), by using the ‘bottom-up’ approach and assisting in the laparoscopic technique platform, to ensure an adequate oncological distal margin, and it could improve the quality of the mesorectum specimens, reduce the circumferential margin involvement rate, afford more precise autonomic nerve preservation rate, and increase sphincter preservation rate. But it is also facing new complications, oncological and functional outcomes problems. Conclusions Although the experience with TaTME remains limited, the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes are acceptable. Nevertheless, there is a need for multicenter, large sample size, and long-term follow-up clinical studies focusing on the long-term outcomes to further improve the oncological safety of TaTME, before widespread application can be recommended.
Objective To assess the feasibility and adequacy of Harmonic Scalpel in a totally laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) and low,ultralow,colo-anal anastomoses for rectal cancer. Methods Excision of the mesorectum and low，ultralow site anastomoses were performed laparoscopically on 30 patients with low rectal cancer based on the concept of TME. Results All 30 TME were successfully completed by laparoscopic approach, and no one was converted to open procedures. A cholecystectomy and/or an ovariotomy were meanwhile performed laparoscopically for 3 patients with rectal cancer,and 1 patient with chronic cholesyctitis, gallstone,ovarian cyst and torsion of the ovary. The operation time was 155 min (115-320 min). Operative blood loss was 20 ml (5-80 ml).The time of bowel function returned and the time to resume postoperative diet was 1-2 days after the operation. Fourteen patients had postoperative analgesic requirement. Average hospital stay was 8 days (5-14 days) and there were no intraoperative and postoperative complications in all 30 patients.Conclusion Laparoscopic excision of the mesorectum and low,ultralow,coloanal anastomoses with Harmonic Scalpel for low rectal cancer is a perspective minimally invasive technique, which is feasible, safe, effective and has dramatic high rates of sphincter preservation with decreased postoperative pain, rapid recovery.
目的 探讨全直肠系膜切除术（total mesorectal excision,TME）在治疗中低位直肠癌中的技术操作与效果。方法 对47例应用TME技术治疗的中低位直肠癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 27例行低位前切除术，20例行腹会阴联合切除术（Miles术），全部病例均顺利完成手术并出院，平均出血量250 ml； 术后发生吻合口漏2例； 术后随访0.5～3年，局部复发5例，因肝转移死亡2例。结论 应用TME技术治疗中低位直肠癌有其适应证，术中须遵循其操作规范，同时应注意采取适当的措施预防吻合口漏。
ObjectiveTo analyze whether transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) can achieve high-quality TME, explore the non-patient factors affecting the quality of taTME, improve the quality of taTME.MethodsThe clinical data of 76 patients undergoing taTME from January 2015 to September 2018 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Nanchong Central Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The operative time, intra-operative bleeding volume, positive rate of circumferential margin, integrity of mesorectum, positive rate of margin and complications were taken as the observation indexes of operative quality. The improvement of surgical equipment, structured training, and the accumulation of surgical cases (No. 1–25 cases was early group, No. 26–50 cases was mid-term group, No. 51–76 cases was later stage group) were compared as grouping conditions, and various factors affecting the quality of taTME were analyzed.Results① Pre- and post-the improvement of surgical equipment: compared to the pre-improvement of surgical equipment group, the distance between tumors and anal margin of patients in the post-improvement of surgical equipment was closer ［(4.9±1.3) cm vs. (5.9±2.7) cm, P=0.040］ and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter ［(10.6±3.9) d vs. (12.4±2.7) d, P=0.023］, while there were no significant difference in the amount of bleeding, the positive rate of circumferential margin, the integrity of mesorectum, the positive rate of margin and the complications in the two groups (P>0.05). ② Pre- and post-training for surgeon: compared to the pre-training group, the operative time in the post-training group was shortened ［(224.6±70.2) min vs. (275±77.0) min, P=0.020］, while there were no statistical differences in the amount of bleeding, the integrity of mesorectum, the difference of the positive rate of circumferential margin, the positive rate of distal margin, postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05). ③ The cumulative grouping of cases: compared to the later stage group ［（218.8±69.5）min］, the operative time in the early group ［(275.2±82.6) min］ and the mid-term group ［(278.8±37.5) min］ were shortened with statistical difference (P=0.022, P=0.003). Moreover, compared to the early group ［(12.9±2.4) d］, the postoperative hospital stay in the mid-term group ［(10.8±4.0) d］ and the later stage group ［(10.2±3.6) d］ were shortened with statistical significance (P=0.032, P=0.007). However, there were no significant difference in the volume of bleeding, the positive rate of circumferential margin, the positive rate of incisal margin and the degree of mesangial integrity among the three groups (P>0.05).ConclusionstaTME can achieve high-quality TME. With the improvement of equipment, the participation of structured training and the accumulation of surgical cases, taTME achieved consistent quality in about 50 cases. The improvement of surgical equipment is the guarantee of the quality of taTME. Structured training is the key to improve the surgical quality of taTME.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current commonly used anal function assessment methods after anorectal preservation surgery, and to discuss the current status of research and existing problems of anal function in patients after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) surgery.MethodBy searching the relevant literatures in domestic and international databases, the studies on anal function of patients after taTME and the studies on anal function assessment tools after anorectal preservation surgery were included to make an review.ResultsThere was little literatures on the recovery of anal function after taTME, especially the long-term recovery of anal function after taTME was still unclear. The anal function in the early stage after traditional anal preserving operation for rectal cancer may be superior to taTME, but the recovery of anal function in the middle and long term after operation was similar. In terms of research tools, most of the current studies tend to use scale assessment method to describe the recovery of anal function after taTME, while the objective quantitative index, such as anorectal manometry and anal ultrasound were rarely used.ConclusionAt present, there is a single and inconsistent research tool for the study of postoperative anal function after taTME, so further research is still needed to provide data reference for the postoperative anal function recovery curve of rectal cancer patients.