【摘要】 目的 探讨比较全肠内营养支持和全肠外营养支持对急性重症胰腺炎（severe acute pamcreattis，SAP）预后的影响。 方法 将2003年1月-2008年12月收治的54例SAP患者于入院后第1周内随机分为两组:全肠内营养（A）组27例；全肠外营养（B）组27例。两组患者均静脉给予广谱抗生素预防感染。入院时CT扫描及C反应蛋白水平显示两组患者具有可比性。 结果 B组22例患者发生器官衰竭，明显高于A组（5例）。B组22例患者接受了手术治疗，A组手术患者6例（Plt;0.05）。A组患者胰腺坏死后感染发生率明显低于B组（Plt;0.05）。B组患者死亡率高于A组（Plt;0.05）。 结论 全肠内营养支持，不仅可以促进肠道功能的恢复和营养状况的维持，还可减少肠源性感染的发生率，对减少SAP的感染性并发症和病死率具有积极作用。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effects of total enteral nutrition and total parenteral nutrition on the prognosis on severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods A total of 54 patients hospitalized from January 2003 to December 2008 were enrolled. In the first week of hospitalization, the patients were randomly divided into two groups: 27 patients in total parenteral nutrition group (group A) and 27 patients in total enteral nutrition group (group B). All patients were administered with sufficient prophylactic antibiotics. The results of CT scan and C-reactive protein levels were comparable between the two groups. Results Twenty-two patients had organ failure in group B, which was much higher than that in group A (five patieuts). The numbers of the patients undertwent surgical intervention in group A and B were 22 and 6 (Plt;0.05). The incidence of infection after pancreatic septic necroses in group A was obviously lower than that in group B (Plt;0.05). The mortality in group B was apparently higher than that in group A (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Total enteral nutrition support can not only promote the functional recovery of intestinal tract and sustain the nutrition of human body,but also decrease the incidence of enterogenic infection.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
Methods Sixty-six postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes were divided into 3 groups according to the balanced principle. In the frist group (FD group), FD was the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the second group (fresubin group), fresubin and the ordinary insulin injection were the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the third group (TPN group), the nutrition preparation came from TPN and the ordinary insulin injection for 24 patients. FD, fresubin or TPN were given at 24 h after operation, the levels of blood glucose for empty stomach, after meal (enteral nutrition or TPN) and the common complications compared among 3 groups of postoperative patients. Results ① In FD group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition were stable with little fluctuation and no insulin was needed with 1 case of hyperglycemia (4.8%). In fresubin group and TPN group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition or TPN were unstable with big fluctuation, with 6 cases (28.6%) and 8 cases (33.3%) of hyperglycemia, 5 cases (23.8%) and 6 cases (25.0%) of hypoglycemia in fresubin group and TPN group, respectively. Compared with fresubin group and TPN group, the rate of pathoglycemia was lower in FD group, the difference had statistical significance separately (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between fresubin group and TPN group (Pgt;0.05). ② The rates of infection of incisional wound in FD group (4.8%) and fresubin group (23.8%) were lower than that of TPN group (33.3%), there was significant difference among 3 groups (Plt;0.05); The time of passage of gas by anus in FD group and fresubin group were shorter than that in TPN group (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between FD group and fresubin group (Pgt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the rates of abdominal distension or diarrhea among 3 groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Regarding postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes, in the early time field test group of the nutrition preparation, FD is better than fresubin or TPN, which does not increase the risk of the blood glucose change and have few complications.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of total parenteral nutrition in neonatal patients and study the nursing methods for these neonates. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 70 neonatal patients who accepted total parenteral nutrition in our hospital from October 2010 to October 2011. Physiological indexes were compared before and after total parenteral nutrition. ResultsSignificant improvements in the nutritional status of all children were observed. All patients achieved good efficacy and effective care. ConclusionTotal parenteral nutrition support for critically ill newborns is of great significance, and good caring also plays an important role.