Objective To explore the optimal technique for digestive tract reconstruction of proximal gastrectomy. Methods Fifty-nine patients who underwent proximal subtotal gastrectomy during June 2004 and January 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the styles of reconstruction: one group with gastroesophagostomy (GE group) and the other with accommodation double tract digestive reconstruction of jejunal interposition (GIE group). The reconstruction of GIE group was to interposite a continuous 35 cm jejunum between the gastric stump and the oesophagus, which detail had been reported in our previous literature. The quality of life in 2 groups were evaluated and compared. Results No patient died and there was no anastomotic leakage, dumping syndrome and moderate or severe anemia occurred during perioperative period. There was no significant difference of the following indexes of nutrition between 2 groups 1 month and 6 months after operation: the value of weight, RBC, Hb, Alb, PNI and the indexes versus the preoperative ones (Pgt;0.05), for the exception of the indexes of RBC (P=0.006), Hb (P=0.001) in 1 month after operation versus the preoperative ones. The abdominal and the reflux esophagitis symptoms in GIE group were milder than those in GE group (Plt;0.001). The Visick scoring: most of the GIE group were gradeⅡ (74.2%), and grade Ⅲ (64.3%) in the GE group. There was no delay of the first time of adjuvant chemotherapy in GIE group (Pgt;0.05), and the surgical time was (0.35±0.13) h more than that of GE group (P=0.01). Conclusion The accommodation double tract digestive reconstruction of jejunal interposition for proximal subtotal gastrectomy may be safe and feasible by decreasing residual cancer cells and improving the quality of life of patients with proximal gastric carcinoma who underwent such surgical procedure.
ObjectiveTo explore feasibility and safety of π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG).MethodThe clinical data of 20 patients who underwent TLTG, admitted in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsTLTG with π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis was successfully carried out in all 20 patients. The operative time was (236.0±55.5) min, the π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis time was (25.7±4.8) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (192.0±148.9) mL, the operative incision length was (3.7±0.8) cm. The postoperative pain score was 2.4±1.1, the first flatus time was (3.1±0.9) d, the first postoperative ambulation time was (1.8±0.7) d, the removal time of nasoenteral nutrution tube was (7.4±2.4) d, the liquid diet time was (6.2±1.4) d, the removal time of intraoabdominal drainage tube was (7.8±2.8) d, the postoperative hospital stay was (10.8±3.0) d. There was no death related to the anastomosis in all patients. Two patients developed a little pleural effusion and 1 patient developed lymphatic leakage were cured with conservative treatment. One patient with intraabdominal encapsulated effusion was cured by puncture and drainage treating. There was no postive incisal margin. The length of upper segment of resection form gastric cancer was (2.3±1.7) cm, the maximum tumor diameter was (4.9±2.8) cm, the number of dissected lymph nodes was 27.9±5.6. All patients were followed up 3–15 months. Eight patients underwent endoscopic examination had no obvious anastomosis stenosis and esophageal reflux. Two patients died of tumor recurrence and metastasis witnin one year after operation, and the rest had disease-free survival until the end of follow-up.ConclusionFrom preliminary results of limited cases in this study, π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in TLTG is a technically safe and feasible surgical procedure in treatment of gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of three methods about digestive tract reconstruction in radical resection for proximal gastric cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cases of 130 proximal gastric cancer patients who underwent double tract reconstruction (TD, 35 cases), total gastrectomy (TG, 50 cases) and esophagogastrostomy (EG, 45 cases) from Jan. 2016 to Oct. 2018 in Gastrointestinal Surgery Department in our Hospital.ResultsThere were no significant differences in basic data of patients, preoperative nutritional status, hemoglobin content, postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospitalization time and early postoperative complications among the three groups (P>0.05). But the operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative status of total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, late complications, reflux symptoms, gastro-intestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) between the three groups had statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The operative time of EG was (161.80±30.77) min, which was the shortest. The intraoperative bleeding volume of TG was (107.20±10.70) mL, which was the most. At 6 months after TG, the total protein, albumin and hemoglobin were (62.15±6.72) g/L, (36.14±6.57) g/L and (112.68±16.97) g/L, respectively, which were the lowest level among the three groups. There late complications of the EG were the most serious, in which the Visick score was 46 and the GIQLI index was 103.56±22.01. The above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsDT performs better in anti-reflux, maintenance of postoperative nutrition, and anti-anemia, but the occurrence of remnant gastric cancer is a potential risk. TG has a lot of bleeding, as well as the performance of postoperative nutrition and anti-anemia is not good, but it can avoid the occurrence of remnant gastric cancer. The operative time of EG is short, but reflux symptoms are more likely to occur after surgery, and the quality of life is bad.
Motor function was investigated by constant perfusion manometry in the Roux limb of ten patients who had undergone total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Results showed that in the fasting state, the migrating motor complex (MMC) was comletely absent, retrograde in direction or bursts of nonphasic pressure activity. Reduced motor activity patterns occurred after the meal in some patients. Four patients failed to convert fasting state into the feeding state. Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomoses provakes a relatively severe distubance in motor function, which could contribute to postoperative upper abdominal distress.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of proximal gastrectomy (PG) versus total gastrectomy (TG) for the treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for literature comparing the efficacy and safety of PG and TG for the treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ AEG. The search period was from database inception to March 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 23 articles were included, including 16 retrospective cohort studies, 5 prospective cohort studies, and 2 randomized controlled trials. The total sample size was 2 826 patients, with 1 389 patients undergoing PG and 1 437 patients undergoing TG. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with TG, PG had less intraoperative blood loss [MD=−19.85, 95%CI (−37.20, −2.51), P=0.02] and shorter postoperative hospital stay [MD=−1.23, 95%CI (−2.38, −0.08), P=0.04]. TG had a greater number of lymph nodes dissected [MD=−6.20, 95%CI (−7.68, −4.71), P<0.001] and a lower incidence of reflux esophagitis [MD=3.02, 95%CI (1.24, 7.34), P=0.01]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two surgical approaches in terms of operative time, postoperative survival rate (1-year, 3-year, 5-year), and postoperative overall complications (P>0.05). ConclusionPG has advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, while TG has advantages in terms of the number of lymph nodes dissected and the incidence of reflux esophagitis. There is no significant difference in long-term survival between the two surgical approaches.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of glutamineenhanced enteral nutritional support on elder patients after total gastrectomy. MethodsA total of eightyfour cases of elder patients receiving total gastrectomy were included in this study from February 2008 to August 2010. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: glutamineenhanced enteral nutrition (Gln) group, enteral nutrition (EN) group and parenteral nutrition (PN) group. The complications and hospital stay after operation were compared, and the levels of serum total protein, albumin, proalbumin， and transferrin of patients were measured before operation, on 2 d and 10 d after operation, respectively. Furthermore, the percentage of CD4 and CD8 T cells, CD4/CD8 ratio， and the levels of serum IgM and IgG of patients in peripheral blood before and after operation were detected. ResultsNutritional therapy was successfully performed in patients of three groups. The anal exhaust time and hospital stay after operation of patients in Gln group and EN group were significantly lower than those in PN group (Plt;0.05). The difference of postoperative complications and digestive tract symptoms of patients in three groups was not obvious (Plt;0.05). Anastomotic fistula occurred in one patient of PN group on 6 d after operation and was cured by conservative treatment for 54 d. The difference of total protein, albumin, proalbumin, and transferrin levels of patients in three groups before operation was not significant (Pgt;0.05), and these indexes fell dramatically on 2 d after operation and lower than before operation (Plt;0.05), although the intergroup difference was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). On 10 d after operation, all indexes recovered in different extent, while those data in Gln group and EN group were significantly higher than those on 2 d after operation (Plt;0.05). The levels of total protein, albumin, and proalbumin of patients in Gln group and EN group were markedly higher than those in PN group (Plt;0.05), although there was no difference between the former groups (Pgt;0.05). The difference of several immunological parameters of patients in three groups before operation was not significant (Pgt;0.05). On 10 d after operation, the percentage of CD4 and CD8 T cells, CD4/CD8 ratio, and the levels of serum IgM and IgG of patients in Gln group returned and even exceeded the preoperative results, which were significantly higher than those in EN group and PN group other than IgM (Plt;0.05). The postoperative results of all parameters except IgG in EN group were significantly lower than preoperative results in patients of EN group and PN group (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsIt is safe and feasible to elder patients who had received total gastrectomy and perioperative glutamine-enhanced nutritional support, which can improve nutrition and immune status, promote the recovery and reduce the duration of hospital stay, and nutritiional support after total gastrectomy is one of the optimal choices for these patients.