ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between graft maturity and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.MethodsA total of 50 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with autologous tendons between August 2016 and August 2018 were included in the study. There were 28 males and 22 females, with an average age of 31.0 years (range, 18-50 years). At 6 months and 2 years after operation, the signal to noise quotient (SNQ) values of tibial and femoral ends of graft were measured by MRI, and the mean value was taken as the SNQ value of graft. The function of knee joint was evaluated by Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. The differences in SNQ values between tibial and femoral ends were analyzed at 6 months and 2 years after operation. The correlation between SNQ value at 6 months after operation and knee function score at 2 years after operation was analyzed. According to SNQ value at 6 months after operation, the patients were divided into group A (SNQ value≥12) and group B (SNQ value<12) and the correlation between SNQ value and knee function score was further analyzed.ResultsAll incisions healed primarily without infection or injury of blood vessels and nerves. All patients were followed up 24-28 months (mean, 26.6 months). The IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores at 6 months and 2 years after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05), and all scores at 2 years after operation were also significantly higher than those at 6 months (P<0.05). The SNQ values at 6 months and 2 years after operation were 12.517±6.272 and 10.900±6.012, respectively, and the difference was significant (t=1.838, P=0.007). The SNQ values of graft at 6 months after operation were significantly different from those at 2 years after operation (P<0.05), and the SNQ values of tibial and femoral ends of graft at the same time point were significantly different (P<0.05). The SNQ value of 50 patients at 6 months after operation was negatively correlated with Lysholm, IKDC, and Tegner scores at 2 years after operation (r=–0.965, P=0.000; r=–0.896, P=0.000; r=–0.475, P=0.003). The patients were divided into groups A and B according to the SNQ value, each with 25 cases; the SNQ values of the two groups at 6 months after operation were negatively correlated with Lysholm, IKDC, and Tegner scores at 2 years after operation (P<0.05).ConclusionAfter ACL reconstruction, the knee function scores and graft maturity of patients gradually improved. The lower the SNQ value in the early stage, the higher the knee function score in the later stage. The SNQ value of MRI in the early stage after ACL reconstruction can predict the knee function in the later stage.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior malleolus fixation on the function of ankle in patients with ankle fracture. Methods Between June 2007 and June 2009, 110 patients with ankle fracture were treated with posteriormalleolus fixation in 59 patients (fixation group) or without fixation in 51 patients (non-fixation group). In fixation group, there were 31 males and 28 females with an average age of 62.6 years (range, 19-75 years); the causes of injury included traffic accident (20 cases), falling (18 cases), and sprain (21 cases) with a disease duration of 1-3 days (2.2 days on average); and the locations were left ankle in 32 cases and right ankle in 27 cases, including 6 cases of type I, 23 of type II, 19 of type III, and 11 of type IV according to the ankle fracture clssification. In non-fixation group, there were 38 males and 13 females with an average age of 64.5 years (range, 16-70 years); the causes of injury included traffic accident (15 cases), falling (12 cases), and sprain (24 cases) with a disease duration of 1-3 days (2.5 days on average); and the locations were left ankle in 22 cases and right ankle in 29 cases, including 8 cases of type I, 16 of type II, 19 of type III, and 8 of type IV according to the ankle fracture clssification. There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All patients of 2 groups achieved wound heal ing by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-18 months (16 months on average). X-ray films showed that fractures healed at 8-12 weeks (10 weeks on average) in fixation group and at 10-14 weeks (12 weeks on average) in non-fixation group. There were significant differences in the cl inical score (89.28 ± 8.62 vs. 86.88 ± 9.47, P lt; 0.05), postoperative reposition score (33.34 ± 2.15 vs. 31.24 ± 2.89, P lt; 0.05), and osteoarthritis score (13.22 ± 1.66 vs. 12.46 ± 2.03, P lt; 0.05) according to Phill i ps ankle scoring system between 2 groups at last follow-up. There was no significant difference in cl inical score of type I and II patients between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but significant differences were found in cl inical score and osteoarthritis score of type III and IV patients between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences in the postoperative reposition score between 2 groups in all types of fractures (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The posterior malleolus fixation may provide satisfactory cl inical functional outcomes for ankle fracture. Proper fracture classification and correct method of internal fixation are important for achieving good reduction and improving the long-term results.
Objective To explore the feasibility and short-term effectiveness of the modified radical resection and reconstruction in the treatment of malignant proximal humerus tumor. Methods The relevant anatomic data from 30 normal adult shoulder joint MRI were measured to analyze the feasibility of modified radical resection and reconstruction surgery in the treatment of malignant proximal humerus tumor. Five patients with malignant proximal humerus tumor were treated by using the modified radical resection and reconstruction surgery between March 2012 and January 2016. There were 1 male and 4 females, aged from 9 to 69 years (median, 46 years). There were 4 cases of osteosarcoma (Enneking IIA in 2 cases and Enneking IIB in 2 cases) and 1 case of metastatic carcinoma (moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma). The disease duration was 7 to 12 months (mean, 9 months). Recurrence of tumor was observed after operation, and the shoulder function was assessed according to Enneking skeletal muscle tumor function scoring system. Results Radiographic results showed that modified radical resection and reconstruction surgery was feasible, which was in allowable range of the maximum longitudinal diameter ( < 29.8 mm) and depth ( < 4 mm). The operation was successfully completed in all 5 cases, and pathological examination suggested that purposes of radical resection had achieved. All patients were followed up 3 to 49 months (mean, 15.6 months). One patient had local recurrence at 12 months after operation, and a shoulder joint amputation was performed; the other 4 patients had good prosthesis survival. At last follow-up, the function of the shoulder joint was obviously recovered when compared with preoperative function; Enneking's skeletal muscle tumor function score was 25.8 points (range, 24 to 27 points). Conclusion Modified radical resection and reconstruction surgery is feasible for the treatment of proximal humerus tumor, and it can maintain a good early shoulder function.
Objective To investigate the influencing factors of the hi p functional recovery after Pi pkin fracture surgery. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analysed, from 37 patients with Pi pkin fracture between May 2002 and February 2009. There were 32 males and 5 females, aged 26 to 98 years (median, 43 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 31 cases, a fall ing in 4 cases, and fall ing from height in 2 cases. The time from injury to operation was 1-28 days (mean, 8.6 days). According to the Pi pkin classification criteria, there were 23 cases of type II, 8 cases of type III, and 6 cases of type IV. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were performed in 27 cases, total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 10 cases.The relationships between gender, age, time from injury to surgery, type of fracture, treatment way and the hip functionalrecovery were analysed statistically. Results All patients achieved heal ing of incision by first intention, no infection anddeep venous thrombosis occurred. All patients were followed up 10 to 94 months with an average of 40.5 months. Bonefusion was observed at 5-11 months (mean, 8.9 months) in patients undergoing ORIF by X-ray examination; no prostheticloosening or subsidence occurred in patients undergoing THA. At last follow-up, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 16-58 points(mean, 37.2 points); the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 13 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 10 cases. The univarible analysis showed that the type of fracture and treatment way significantly affected the hip functional recovery (P lt; 0.05). The multivarible analysis showed that the type of fracture and treatment way had no significant effect on the hip functional recovery (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Type and treatment way of Pi pkin fracture may affect postoperative hi p function recovery, so appropriate treatment should be selected based on fracture type to ensure the restoration of joint function.
Objective To compare the early analgesic effects and the impact on knee joint function recovery after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) between single adductor canal block (SACB) and continuous adductor canal block (CACB) combined with local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) using a prospective study. Methods The patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted between April 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled as a subject. Among them, 60 patients met the selection criteria and were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to the SACB group or CACB group in a ratio of 1:1 using a random number table method. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in terms of age, gender, height, body mass, body mass index, affected side, and preoperative resting visual analogue scale (VAS) score and active VAS score, Oxford knee score (OKS), and American Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) score. All patients received multimodal analgesia management using LIA combined with SACB or CACB. The operation time, pain related indicators (resting and activity VAS scores, number and timing of breakthrough pain, opioid consumption), joint function related indicators (quadriceps muscle strength, knee range of motion, OKS score, and HSS score), as well as postoperative block complications and adverse events were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (P<0.05). All patients in the two groups were followed up with a follow-up time of (9.70±4.93) months in the SACB group and (12.23±5.05) months in the CACB group, and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The CACB group had a significant lower resting VAS score at 24 hours after operation compared to the SACB group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in resting and active VAS scores between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). The CACB group had a significantly lower incidence of breakthrough pain compared to the SACB group [9 cases (30.00%) vs. 17 cases (56.67%); P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the timing of breakthrough pain occurrence and opioid consumption between the two groups (P>0.05). Four cases in the SACB group and 7 cases in the CACB group experienced adverse events, with no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05). The CACB group had significantly better knee joint mobility than the SACB group at 1 and 2 days after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in knee joint mobility on 0 day after operation and quadriceps muscle strength and OKS and HSS scores at different time points (P>0.05). Conclusion In UKA, the analgesic effects and knee joint function recovery are similar when compared between LIA combined with SACB and LIA combined with CACB. However, SACB is simpler to perform and can avoid adverse events such as catheter displacement and dislocation. Therefore, SACB may be a better choice.
ObjectiveTo compare the patient-reported outcomes regarding function, joint amnesia, and the quality of life after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods The clinical data of patients who received UKA or TKA between September 2017 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. After propensity score matching, 40 patients (40 knees) each in TKA group and UKA group were finally included in the study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, surgical side, preoperative knee range of motion, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, clinical and function scores of knee society score (KSS) (P>0.05). At 2 years after operation, WOMAC score, KSS clinical and function scores were performed on the two groups of patients, and compared with preoperative ones; knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short form (KOOS-PS), short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36 scale), and forgotten joint score (FJS) were also performed. Results At 2 years after operation, the total score of WOMAC, the clinical and function scores of KSS in the two groups significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the total score of WOMAC, the individual score of WOMAC, the clinical and function scores of KSS between the two groups (P>0.05). The total KOOS-PS score in the UKA group was significantly lower than that in the TKA group (t=4.243, P=0.000), and the scores of writhing/knee rotation, kneeling, and squatting in the UKA group were significantly lower than those in the TKA group (P<0.05). The total FJS score in the UKA group was significantly higher than that in the TKA group (t=−6.334, P=0.000). In the UKA group, the scores of 7 items were significantly lower than those of the TKA group (P<0.05) including when walking over 15 minutes, when climbing stairs, when walking on uneven ground, when standing for long periods, when doing housework or gardening, when taking a walk or hiking, and when doing your favorite sport. The SF-36 scales of physiological function, energy, social function, emotional function, and mental health in the UKA group were significantly higher than those in the TKA group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with TKA, patients treated with UKA may have better knee function recovery, joint amnesia, and higher quality of life.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the AO anatomical locking compression plate in treating type C distal humeral fracture. Methods Between July 2008 and April 2009, 13 cases of type C distal humeral fracture were treated with the AO anatomical locking compression plates. There were 5 males and 8 females with an average age of 52.1 years (range, 24-80 years). Fractures were caused by tumbl ing in 7 cases, by traffic accident in 4 cases, and by fall ing from height in2 cases. According to Association for Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, there were 3 cases of type C1, 6 cases of type C2, and 4 cases of type C3. Two cases compl icated by ulnar nerve injuries, 1 by radial nerve injury, 2 by fractures of ulnar olecranon, 3 by fractures of other parts of extremities, and 6 by osteoporosis. The time from injury to hospital ization ranged from 3 hours to 4 days (0.9 day on average). Results All the incisions achieved heal ing by first intention. Thirteen cases were followed up 12 to 21 months with an average of 15.9 months. According to the X-ray films, unions were achieved both at fracture site and the olecranon osteotomy site with a heal ing time of 8 to 13 weeks (10 weeks on average). The function of elbows recovered from 3 to 32 weeks (10 weeks on average). No fixation failure, myositis ossifican, delayed union, or malunion occurred during the follow-up. The Mayo Elbow Performance score ranged from 75 to 100 with an average score of 95.8; the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 92.3%. Conclusion The AO anatomical locking compression plate has a good fixation in treating type C distal humeral fracture. Through the approach of olecranon osteotomy, it is easy to get anatomical reduction, stable fixation, and early exercise.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of selective exercise training technique combined with ultrasound therapy on patellofemoral pain syndrome. MethodsPatients who met the research criteria were assigned into treatment group and control group randomly between July 2011 and August 2012. Each group had 28 patients. There were no significant differences in gender, age and body mass index between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in the treatment group received selective exercise therapy and ultrasound therapy, while patients in the control group received normal exercise treatment and ultrasound therapy. Knee numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and knee functional obstruction assessment were performed on all the patients before treatment and 5 days after treatment (on the 6th day) for comparison. ResultsBefore treatment, the score of NPRS in the treatment group and the control group was 4.7±0.8 and 4.8±0.9, respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The score of functional obstruction assessment was 11.2±2.2 and 12.2±2.7 in the two groups without significant difference (P>0.05). Five days after treatment, the NPRS score decreased to 2.1±0.5 in the treatment group and 4.2±1.0 in the control group, and the knee functional obstruction assessment score decreased to 6.4±1.9 and 11.1±2.6, respectively. Both groups improved significantly in NPRS score and knee functional obstruction assessment score (P＜0.05), while the treatment group exhibited more improvement in the two scores than the control group (P＜0.05). ConclusionSelective exercise training is effective for improving the pain and function of patients with patellofemoral syndrome.
Objective To explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in pain management after knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Doctor-nurse pain management team was established based on ERAS between June and July 2016, and the pain management was carried out after training the doctors and nurses. According to the formula of two-sample mean comparison and inclusion and exclusion criteria, 60 TKA patients admitted to the hospital from March to May 2016 were assigned into the control group (before intervention) and 60 TKA patients admitted from August to October 2016 were assigned into the trial group (after intervention). The patients in the control group received routine pain management. In the trial group, preventive analgesia was performed, pain health education paths were built and ISBAR communication mode was made preoperatively; anesthesia protocols were optimized intraoperatively; multimodal analgesia based on time-demand was used postoperatively; continuing analgesia program was provided at the discharge. The pain score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, average length of stay (ALOS) and average hospitalization cost (excluding materials) were compared between the two groups. Results The pain scores between the two groups at the admission and 6 hours after surgery were not statistically different (P>0.05), and the pain scores in the trial group 24, 48, 72 hours after surgery were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The HSS scores between the two groups at the admission were not statistically different (P>0.05), and the HSS scores in the trial group 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). And ALOS and average hospitalization cost (excluding materials) in the trial group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of ERAS in pain management after TKA can effectively alleviate the postoperative pain, improve the patients’ knee function, shorten the ALOS, and decrease the average hospitalization cost.
Objective To investigate the effect of preoperative rehabilitation on early function of joints after total hip arthroplasty by comparing with non-preoperative rehabilitation. Methods Between March 2010 and November 2011, 98 patients with hip disease were recruited in study. Of 98 patients, 49 received preoperative rehabilitation for 2 weeks in trial group, and 49 did not receive preoperative rehabilitation in control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, disease cause, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and preoperative Harris score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results There was no significant difference in VAS score at each time point after operation between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but significant differences were found in Harris score (P lt; 0.05). At 3 days after operation, compliance evaluation results showed that 36 cases were of full compliance, and 13 cases were of partial compliance in trial group; 27 cases were of full compliance, 14 cases were of partial compliance, and 8 cases were of non-compliance in control group; there was significant difference between 2 groups (Z=2.286, P=0.002). The ambulation time was within 7 days in trial group, and was within 7 days in 47 cases and more than 7 days in 2 cases in control group; there was significant difference between 2 groups (Z=3.840, P=0.000). Conclusion Preoperative rehabilitation plays an important role in compliance, decreased bed rest time, and hip function improvement in patients after total hip arthroplasty.