【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the protective effect of early motion on articular cartilage after joint allograft by performing a controlled trial between different post-operation strategies after joint allograft in an animal model. Methods Twenty hemi-knee joints were harvested from 10 6-month-old New Zealand white rabbits (male or female, weighing 2.5-3.0 kg); 10 hemi-knee joints by deep frozen treatment (donors) were transplanted to unilateral knee joints (recipients) of 10 6-month-old Chinchilla rabbits (male or female, weighing 2.5-3.0 kg), which were divided into early motion group (n=5) and sustained fixation group (n=5); and 10 hemi-knee joints were used as blank control (n=5) and frozen control (n=5). The articular cartilage of allogenic joints was detected by X-ray film, gross, and histology at 6 weeks after operation. Results Gross observation: no obvious limitation of joint movements was observed in early motion group, but obvious limitation in sustained fixation group. X-ray films: the bone ends between donor and recipient healed well with good paraposition and alignment on the operation day and 2 weeks after operation; at 6 weeks, angulation deformity was observed in early motion group of 3 rabbits, and paraposition and alignment were satisfactory in sustained fixation group. Histological observation: HE staining showed that the chondrocytes had normal quantity and morphology with few nuclear fragmentation and karyolysis in early motion group, but the quantity of chondrocytes sharply decreased with dissolved nuclei and numerous fibrous tissues in the cartilage matrix in sustained fixation group. The cell survival rate of the early motion group (49.66% ± 2.15%) was significantly higher than that of the sustained fixation group (20.68% ± 1.24%) (P lt; 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy observation: nuclear membrane was intact with chromatin condensation and edema of mitochondria and rough surfaced endoplasmic reticulum in early motion group, and that the membrane of chondrocyte vanished with blurring border between chondrocyte and matrix, rupture of nuclear membrane and the disappearance of chromatin and organelles could be found in sustained fixation group. Conclusion Early motion has protective effect on articular cartilage after joint allograft, but cannot completely prevent degeneration of the allogenic articular cartilage.
Objective To evaluate the long-term function of the traumaticallydamaged joint after its repair with transplantation of a fresh or a frozen allogenic joint. Methods From March 1977 to September 1993, 13 patients (9 males, 4females; age, 17-55 years) with traumatically-damaged joints underwent transplantation of the fresh or the frozen allogenic joints. Five patients had 5 damagedmetacarpophalangeal joints, 6 patients had 9 damaged interphalangeal joints, and 2 patients had 2 damaged elbow joints. So, the traumatic damage involved 13 patients and 16 joints. All the metacarpophalangeal joints and the interphalangeal joints were injured by machines and the 2 elbow joints were injured by road accidents. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group A (n=7) andGroup B (n=6). The 7patients with 8 joints in Group A underwent transplantation of fresh allogenic joints; the 6 patients with 8 joints in Group B underwent transplantation of frozen allogenic joints. The allogenic joint transplants were performed in the period from immediately after the injuries to 6 months after the injuries. The motion ranges of the transplanted joints and the X-ray films were examined after operation, and the immunological examination was performed at 8 weeksafter operation. Results The time for synostosis was 5-8 months in Group A, but4-6 months in Group B. In Group A, at 2 years after operation the metacarpophalangeal flexion was 30-40° and the interphalangeal flexion was 20-30°; however,at 6 or 7 years after operation the interphalangeal flexion was only 10-20°. The patients undergoing the transplantation with fresh elbow joints had the elbowflexion of 60° and the elbow extension of 0°, and had the forearm pronation of 30°and the forearm supination of 30°. But in Group B, at 2 years after operation the metacarpophalangeal flexion was 6070° and the interphalangeal flexionwas 40-50°; at 6 or 7 years after operation the interphalangeal flexion was still 40-50°. However, the patients undergoing the transplantation with frozen elbow joints had the elbow flexion of 90° and the elbow extension of 0°, and hadthe forearm pronation of 45° and a forearm supination of 45°. The joint motion ranges, the Xray findings, and the immunological results in the patients undergoing the transplantation of the frozen allogenic joints were significantly better than those in the patients undergoing the transplantation of fresh allogenicjoints. There was a significant difference in the immunological examination between Group A and Group B (IL2, 21.64±3.99；CD4/CD8,3.88±0.82 vs.IL-2,16.63±3.11；CD4/CD8, 2.53±0.23, P＜0.01). Conclusion Repairing the traumatically-damaged joints with frozen allogenic joints is a better method of regaining the contour, movement, and complex motion of the hands.
Objective To evaluate the shortterm efficacy of osteoarticular allografts in the limb salvage of the proximal tibia. Methods From 1998 to 2003, 15 patients (7 males, 8 females; aged 14-56 yr, average 33) with bone tumor of the proximal tibia underwent osteoarticular allografts, among whom 7 had progressive giant cell tumor without any previous chemotherapy; 8 had malignant tumor with previous chemotherapy, including 6 patients with osteosarocoma, 1 with spindle cell sarcoma, and 1 with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. According to the Enneking system, the patients were classified into ⅠB (7 patients), ⅡA (2 patients), and ⅡB (6 patients). All the patientsunderwent the marginal resection with an allograft (average length 12 cm, range6-16 cm) implanted. Results The follow-up for an average of 21 months (range,3-58 months) revealed that among the 8 patients with malignant tumor of the proximal tibia undergoing chemotherapy, 5 had union of the bone, 3 had no union of the bone; among the 3 patients, 2 had a complication of infection and 1 had a local recurrence. All the 3 patients underwent amputation at the lower part of the femur. According to the Mankin score, 2 patients had a perfect result, 2 good, 1 fair, and 3 poor, with a 50% effectiveness rate. Among the 7 patients with progressive giant cell tumor at the upper part of the tibia, none had infection or local recurrence, but 2 hadnonunion of the bone and 2 had joint instability, aided by the kneeaidingsystem. According to the Mankin score, 3 patients had a perfect result, 2 good,and 2 fair, with a 71% effectiveness rate. Conclusion The osteoarticular allograft of the proximal tibia has many advantages in spite of a relatively highrate of complications, and it is the limb salvage of choicefor the progressivebenign or malignant bone tumors of the proximal tibia.
From 1979, a total of 5 cases of giant cell tumor of the lower end of radius were treated by segmental resection, and vascularized fibular head transplantation, and reconstruction of the inferior radio-ulnar joint. The bone healed within 2-3 months. The patients were followed for 5-10 years. There was no recurrence, nor distant metastasis, and the functional recovery of extremities was satisfactory.The clinical materials, the operative techniques and the assessment of the long-term results were introduced.
Five patients with disable metacarpophalangeal joints were reconstructed using metatarsophalangeal joint autotransplantation. It was found that both ends of the autograft united rigidly with recipient bones. At present, 4 patients followed up more than 25 years. Although some obvious degenerative changes were identified, the reconstructed joints were stable and no pain. The ranges of movement were more than 20 degrees. The index-to-thumb pinch functions were also satisfactory.