Objective To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodeses. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 30 patients undergoing unilateral ankle arthrodesis between January 2008 and January 2011. Of 30 patients, 14 underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (arthroscopic group), and 16 underwent open ankle arthrodesis (open group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, lesion type, disease duration, and preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, postoperative AOFAS score, and bony union rate were observed to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time of arthroscopic group was significantly longer than that of open group (P lt; 0.05); the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospitalization days of arthroscopic group were significantly less than those of open group (P lt; 0.05). Superficial infection of incision occurred in 1 case of open group, and healing of incision by first intention was obtained in the other patients. All patients were followed up 12 months. No screw breakage was observed. The X-ray films showed bony fusion in 13 cases (92.86%) of arthroscopic group and in 10 cases (62.50%) of open group at 3 months after operation, showing significant difference (χ2=3.850, P=0.049); but no significant difference was found (χ2=0.910, P=0.341) in bony fusion rate between the arthroscopic group (14/14, 100%) and open group (15/16, 93.75%) at 12 months after operation. The AOFAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation were significantly higher than preoperative score in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS score between 2 groups at 1 and 3 months (P gt; 0.05), but significant differences were found at 6 and 12 months (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The overall effectiveness of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is better than that of open ankle arthrodesis, which can decrease intraoperative blood loss, shorten hospitalization days, get higher bony fusion rate, and obtain good ankle function recovery.
Objective To summarize the anatomic features of the posterior septum of the knee joint and its application in posterior trans-septal portal for arthroscopic surgery. Methods The literature related to posterior septum of the knee joint and arthroscopic surgery was extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results The posterior septum of the knee joint has more mechanoreceptors and blood vessels in the upper part, which are close to arteria popliteal at the tibial plateau level; the posterior compartment is divided into wider posteromedial and narrower posterolateral compartments. A safe arthroscopic trans-septal portal is established, in the knee flexion of 90°, in a lateral-to-medial direction, and with an inserting location below the middle of posterior septum. Conclusion The establishment method of posterior trans-septal portal is not uniform and all the features of posterior septum should be considered to decrease the complications.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical results of arthroscopical subtalar arthrodesis for malunion of calcaneal fractures. Methods Between July 2006 and December 2008, 12 cases of malunion of calcaneal fractures were treated witharthroscopical subtalar arthrodesis, inculding 10 males and 2 females with an age range of 38-54 years (44.8 years on average). The location was left side in 5 cases and right side in 7 cases. The injury was caused by fall ing from height in 8 cases, by traffic accident in 3 cases, and other in 1 case. It was 3-7 months from injury to operation. All cases were classified as Stephens type II. The total score was 35.68 ± 10.35 and the pain score was 8.14 ± 1.83 before operation according to Hindfoot scores system of American Orthopaedic Foot amp; Ankle Society (AOFAS). Results All incisions achieved parimary heal ing and the patients were all followed up 14-32 months (18 months on average). The X-ray films showed bony fusion after 10-14 weeks (11.5 weeks on average). The total score was 76.45 ± 9.83 and the pain score was 1.52 ± 1.48 after operation according to Hindfoot scores system of AOFAS, showing significant difference when compared with those before operation (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion Arthroscopical subtalar arthrodesis can get satisfactory fusion rate with few compl ications for malunion of calcaneal fractures.
目的 探讨缝合治疗在膝关节内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂中的应用及效果。 方法 对2010年6月－2012年7月18例膝关节内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂患者，采用多种缝合材料、缝合方式相结合的方法予以救治。 结果 18例患者术后即时MRI均显示内侧半月板位置、形态恢复良好。随访12～26个月，所有患者膝关节活动度均正常，Lysholm评分术前（45.0 ± 3.5）分，术后末次随访（93.0 ± 5.1）分，差异有统计学意义（t=2.064，P＜0.05）；国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节评估表评分，术前（49.0 ± 1.5）分，术后（92.0 ± 3.6）分，差异有统计学意义（t=2.205，P＜0.05）；无膝关节疼痛，麦氏试验阴性，术后MRI显示内侧半月板愈合良好。 结论 采用缝合方法可挽救内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂，恢复半月板稳定性及正常功能。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety of arthroscopic operation with artificial space on the buttocks for gluteal muscles contracture (GMC) by measuring the plasma osmolarity. MethodsBetween May and June 2011, 30 cases of GMC were joined in the study. Of them, 11 were male and 19 were female with an age range from 4 to 39 years (mean, 24.4 years). Twenty-eight patients had a definite history of repeat intragluteal injection. The disease duration ranged from 1-30 years (mean, 14 years). During operation, normal saline solution was used as lavage fluid, and radiofrequency energy was used as cutter for releasing GMC. The plasma sodium, plasma potassium, blood glucose, blood urea nitrogen concentrations, and plasma osmolarity were compared before and after operation; input and output volume of lavage fluid and intravenous dropping volume were recorded. Whether patients suffered from water intoxication or not was observed. The effect was evaluated through the criteria proposed by XIA Rongxi et al. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in all patients, who had no water intoxication. The operation time was 16-70 minutes (mean, 33.4 minutes). The input volume was 2-23 L (mean, 6.3 L), the output volume was 2-22 L (mean, 5.8 L), and the absorption volume was 0.1-1.2 L (mean, 0.5 L); and the intravenous dropping volume was 350-1 300 mL (mean, 850 mL). No significant difference was found in plasma sodium, plasma potassium, blood glucose, blood urea nitrogen concentrations, and plasma osmolarity between before and after operations (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 3-26 months (mean, 12.7 months). At last follow-up, according to XIA Rongxi's et al evaluation standard, the results were excellent in 27 cases, good in 3 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 100%. ConclusionArthroscopic operation with artificial space on the buttocks is safe and reliable in the treatment of GMC.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic debridement versus non-operative treatment for degenerative meniscal tear. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2015), WanFang Data, CBM, and CNKI were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about arthroscopic debridement versus non-operative treatment for degenerative meniscal tear from inception to July 2015. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of nine RCTs involving 1 023 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:there were no significant differences between two groups at different follow-up time points in knee scoring scale (less than 6 months:SMD=0.12, 95%CI -0.11 to 0.35, P=0.30; 1 year:SMD=-0.03, 95%CI -0.18 to 0.11, P=0.65; 2 years:SMD=-0.07, 95%CI -0.32 to 0.19, P=0.61) and pain score (less than 6 months:MD=0.30, 95%CI -0.10 to 0.70, P=0.14; 1 year:MD=0.10, 95%CI -0.40 to 0.60, P=0.70; 2 years:MD=0.02, 95%CI -0.52 to 0.92, P=0.90). ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that arthroscopic debridement hasn't better effective than non-operative treatment for degenerative meniscal tear, however, due to the limited quantity of the included studies, the above conclusion still need more high quality research to be verified.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic distal clavicle resection for the symptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis. MethodsThe clinical data of 14 patients with symptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis treated by arthroscopic indirect distal clavicle resection between January 2020 and March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males and 9 females with an average age of 46.3 years (range, 18-57 years). The 4 cases of left shoulder and 10 cases of right shoulder were accompanied with acromial impingement, without the history of shoulder trauma. The average disease duration was 20.4 months (range, 9-48 months), and the average visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 7.6 (range, 5-9) preoperatively. The results were evaluated using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating score before and after operation, further, the patient satisfaction rate was also calculated. Results All 14 patients were followed up 5-18 months, with an average of 13 months. There was no postoperative pain of acromioclavicular joint in 12 patients; 1 case had occasional mild pain, which could be controlled by painkillers. Moreover, there was only 1 acromioclavicular joint subluxation due to early fitness training at 2 weeks postoperatively, and the symptoms gradually relieved after 1 month of conservative treatments. The UCLA score was 22.1±6.2 preoperatively, which improved to 30.2±3.4 at last follow-up, showing significant difference (t=5.359, P<0.001). The patient satisfaction rate was 92.9%, with 12 excellent cases, 1 good case, and 1 fair case. Conclusion Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection for symptomatic acromioclavicular arthritis is a safe, reliable, and repeatable procedure.
ObjectiveTo compare the mid-term effectiveness of arthroscopy versus conservative treatment on symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus (SDLM) in middle-aged and elderly patients. Methods The clinical data of 118 middle-aged and elderly patients (154 knees) with SDLM who received arthroscopy or conservative treatment between June 2014 and May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed, including 76 patients (96 knees) in the arthroscopy group (group A) and 42 patients (58 knees) in the conservative treatment group (group B). There was no significant difference in age, gender, and body mass index between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with group B, the symptoms duration in group A was longer, the incidences of discoid lateral meniscus injury and mechanical symptoms were higher, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Lysholm score before treatment were worse, with significant differences (P<0.05). VAS score and Lysholm score before and after treatment were recorded and compared. ResultsThe patients in both groups were followed up 60-74 months, with an average of 66.3 months. The follow-up time of group A and group B was (65.9±3.5) months and (67.0±4.0) months respectively, with no significant difference (t=–1.615, P=0.109). At last follow-up, in either group A or group B, the VAS score and Lysholm score significantly improved when compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). The differences of VAS score and Lysholm score in group A before and after treatment were significantly better than those in group B (P<0.05). ConclusionArthroscopy and conservative treatment have a satisfactory mid-term effectiveness on SDLM in middle-aged and elderly patients. However, the improvement of symptoms and function of arthroscopy was significantly better than that of conservative treatment. For middle-aged and elderly SDLM patients with invalidated conventional treatment for 6 months, severe clinical symptoms, long duration of symptoms, and combined with mechanical symptoms, arthroscopy should be given priority even if they are complicated with early osteoarthritis.