Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Between August 2014 and August 2016, 42 patients with ACL ruptures who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were randomly divided into 2 groups: 21 patients received graft soaked with PRP (trial group) and 21 patients received routine graft in ACL reconstruction (control group). Because 6 patients failed to be followed up, 17 patients of trial group and 19 of control group were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, injury reason, disease duration, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) activity scores between 2 groups (P>0.05). VAS score, Lysholm score, and IKDC activity scores were used to evaluate pain and function at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Further, second arthroscopy and MRI examination were performed at 12 months postoperatively. Results The patients in both groups were followed up 3 to 12 months with an average of 9.83 months. The VAS score, Lysholm score, and IKDC activity scores were significantly improved at 3 and 12 months after operation in 2 groups (P<0.05), and the scores of trial group were significantly better than those of control group at 3 months (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 12 months (P>0.05). No complications of effusion, infection, and allergy were observed in 2 groups during follow-up. MRI showed good position of ACL grafts and good signal quality of the graft in the majority of the cases. However, mixed hyperintense and presence of synovial fluid at the femoral bone-tendon graft interface were found in 3 patients of trial group and 4 patients of control group, indicating poor remodeling ligamentation. MRI score was 3.53±1.13 in trial group and was 3.21±0.92 in control group, showing no significant difference (t=0.936,P=0.356). The second arthroscopy examination showed ligament remodeling score was higher in trial group than control group (t=3.248,P=0.014), but no significant difference was found in synovial coverage score and the incidence of cartilage repair (t=2.190,P=0.064;χ2=0.090,P=0.764). Conclusion PRP application in allograft ACL reconstruction can improve knee function and relieve pain after operation, which may also accelerate graft remodeling.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate in post-operation treatment of the knee. METHODS From January 1998 to February 2001, 4 ml of sodium hyaluronate injection was injected into the knee joint of the 134 cases at the end of arthroscope operation, or the 91 cases undergoing open operation of the knee at the time when the drain tube was removed (treatment group). Five days after operation, the hydrarthrosis was removed and 2 ml of sodium hyaluronate was injected into the knee joint. According to the patient’s condition, injection of sodium hyaluronate was performed once a week for several weeks. Clinical evaluation was made by evaluating pain visual analog scale (VAS) and painless range of movement (ROM) of the joint at every definite point of time. The 85 patients in control group used nothing at the same time. RESULTS The VAS score of patients in the treatment group was significant lower than that of the control group. The period to the maximal painless ROM of the joint was 6 days in the treatment group after open operation, while 9 days in the control group. CONCLUSION Sodium hyaluronate appears effective in relieving post-operation pain of the knee joint.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial use on preventing infections after arthroscopy.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect clinical studies on the efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial use on preventing infections after arthroscopy from January 1990 to September 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software.ResultsA total of 8 retrospective cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial involving 60 136 subjects were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: there was no difference in the post-operational infection rate among patients with and without antimicrobial prophylaxis for arthroscopies (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.25 to 1.04, P=0.06). For knee arthroscopies, the post-operational infection rate had no difference between patients with and without antimicrobial prophylaxis (OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.23, P=0.48). However, for shoulder arthroscopies, the post-operational infection rate in the antimicrobial prophylaxis group was significantly lower than that in the group without the antimicrobial prophylaxis(OR=0.18, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.37, P<0.000 01).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that there is no association between preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis and a decreased infection rate for knee arthroscopies. Antimicrobial prophylaxis appears to lead to fewer infections after shoulder arthroscopies. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Frozen shoulder is a common disease in orthopaedic clinic. The main clinical manifestations were shoulder joint pain and limited active and passive activity. However, the etiology and pathogenesis of frozen shoulder are not fully understood, so people can not choose the appropriate treatment plan. In recent years, there have been a lot of exploration on the pathogenesis and treatment measures of this disease at home and abroad, but there is no unified standard for the treatment of frozen shoulder. This article summarizes the treatment methods of frozen shoulder at home and abroad in recent years, analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of non-surgical treatment and surgical treatment, in order to provide assistance for clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of distraction therapy assisted by arthroscope in the treatment of ankle traumatic osteoarthritis. MethodsBetween October 2013 and October 2014, 13 patients with ankle traumatic osteoarthritis were treated, including 8 males and 5 females with an age range of 44-63 years (mean, 55.2 years). The left ankle and the right ankle were involved in 4 and 9 cases respectively. The disease duration was 1.5-10.0 years (median, 5 years). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind foot scale score was 51.00±7.09; the short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) score was 40.82±4.62. According to Scranton grade system, 9 cases were rated as grade II and 4 cases as grade III. First, ankle hyperplasia osteophytes was removed under arthroscope, then Ilizarov apparatus was used to maintain distraction of 5-10 mm ankle space for 3 months. ResultsOne case had postoperative pin tract infection after removing the external fixation, and infection was controlled by dressing treatment; no related complications occurred in the other patients. All patients got follow-up of 12-18 months (mean, 14.7 months). Patients achieved disappearance of ankle swelling, pain relief, and were able to walk after rehabilitation. The ankle activity was obviously improved. At last follow-up, AOFAS ankel-hind foot scale score and SF-36 score were significantly increased to 85.23±6.41 and 56.29±6.20 respectively (t=20.756, P=0.025; t=11.647, P=0.018). According to AOFAS scores, the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 8 cases, and fair in 1 case; the excellent and good rate was 92.3%. Postoperative X-ray film showed normal ankle position and alignment, osteophytes at the edges of the tibia and talus, articular surface sclerosis, normal joint space, and no joint swelling. ConclusionDistraction therapy assisted by arthroscope is an effective method for treating ankle traumatic osteoarthritis.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic debridement and release for post-traumatic arthritis of subtalar joint. Methods Between January 2011 and December 2014, 14 cases of post-traumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint underwent arthroscopic debridement and release, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were male, aged 42 years on average (range, 32-62 years). Calcaneus fracture was caused by falling from height; 8 cases received conservative treatment and the other 6 cases received open reduction and internal fixation. The mean interval from injury to operation was 3.4 years (range, 2-7 years). The arthroscopic debridement and release were performed through lateral portals. The injury degree of articular cartilage was classified as grade 3 in 4 cases and grade 4 in 10 cases based on Outerbridge rating. The degree of pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the function of joint was assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Scale. Results All incisions healed by first intention and no complication occurred. The follow-up time was 18 months. Pain was relieved obviously; VAS was significantly decreased to postoperative 3.8±0.9 at 18 months from preoperative 7.7±1.2 (t=9.728,P=0.000), and AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Scale was significantly increased to postoperative 59.1±8.8 from preoperative 37.6±8.2 (t=6.688,P=0.000). During follow-up, no patient was given arthrodesis and no worsened sign was found on the postoperative CT and MRI. Conclusion Arthroscopic debridement and release for post-traumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint can relieve clinical symptoms and delay subtalar arthrodesis.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of anatomical single-bundle (ASB) and over-the-top singlebundle (OSB) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate l igament (ACL). Methods Between January 2008 and June 2008, 64 patients with ACL injury underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. ASB ACL reconstruction was performed in 28 cases (ASB group) and OSB ACL reconstruction in 36 cases (OSB group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, diseaseduration, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and side-to-side difference between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention; no infection or other compl ications occurred. All cases were followed up 20-24 months (mean, 21.5 months). There were significant differences in the IKDC score, Lysholm score, and the side-to-side difference between last follow-up and preoperation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Significant differences were found in negative rate of the pivot shift test between last follow-up and preoperation in ASB group and between 2 groups at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between last follow-up and preoperation in OSB group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The effectiveness of arthroscopic ASB ACL reconstruction is better than that of arthroscopic OSB ACL reconstruction, especially in controll ing rotational stabil ity.