ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficiency of the spot-welding electrocoagulation with needle-knife to prevent bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). MethodsThe clinical data of 187 patients underwent EST from August 2009 to October 2009 were retrospectively analyzed, study group (n=102) were treated with spotwelding electrocoagulation with needleknife and 110 000 noradrenaline washing, control group (n=85) were treated with 110 000 noradrenaline washing alone. The bleeding and complications after EST were observed. ResultsThe differences of gender, age, primary diseases, cormorbidities, nutritional status, and immune function were not significant between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The bleeding after EST happened 4 cases (4.70%) in the control group and none in the study group. The bleeding rate of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (Plt;0.05). The bleeding cases in the control group were controlled successfully by spotwelding electrocoagulation with needleknife under endoscopy. Cholangitis occurred in 5 cases altogether, 1 case in each group deteriorated promptly and died of multiple organ failure syndrome, another 3 cases, 2 in the study group, 1 in the control group, were cured by PTCD and antibiotics. Biliary tract hemorrhage occurred one case in each group, which one died in the study group. Pancreatitis occurred 1 case in the study group and 2 cases in the control group, all of which were salvaged by conservative therapy. The incidences of complications were not significantly different between two groups (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionsThe spotwelding electrocoagulation with needleknife can significantly reduce the bleeding rate after EST. It is an effective, safe, and easy technique, especially to rural areas.
目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与内镜十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(EST)联合应用治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析我院开展的LC联合EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石76例,其中56例先行EST后行LC,20例先行LC后行ERCP/EST。结果:本组全部治愈,先行EST组56例,3例并发胰腺炎,3例出血,2例再发胆总管结石,先行LC组20例行EST11例,6例取石后未做括约肌切开,3例结石自行掉入肠道,1例出现胆道感染,1例胰腺炎,无出血及穿孔。结论:内镜治疗胆囊结石继发胆总管结石具有创伤小、效果好、并发症少、恢复快的的特点;先作EST可解除胆道梗阻、减轻炎症,并为LC创造条件,选择性先行LC后可减轻创伤,甚至不必做EST。
ObjectivesTo explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation in the treatment of hypertension-related intracerebral hemorrhage.MethodsA total of 122 patients with hypertension-related intracerebral hemorrhage treated in our hospital from October 2015 to May 2019 were categorized into experimental group (n=62) and control group (n=60). The experimental group was treated with endoscopic intracerebral hematoma removal, while the control group was treated with traditional craniotomy. The operative indexes, postoperative recovery, serum endothelin, IL-6, CRP levels and the incidence of postoperative complications were observed and compared between the two groups, and the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation were analyzed.ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hematoma clearance rate, ICU treatment time, the volume of brain edema 7 days after operation, the postoperative intracranial pressure, NIHSS score and ADL score in experimental group were significantly superior to those in control group. The levels of serum endothelin, IL-6 and CRP in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group after operation. The incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in control group. Univariate analysis showed that the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma was significantly correlated with the history of hypertension, preoperative GCS score, the amount of bleeding and whether been broken into the ventricle (P<0.05), but not with age, sex and location of hemorrhage (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the history of hypertension above 10 years, blood loss above 50 mL, intraventricular rupture and preoperative GCS score were the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation.ConclusionsCompared with traditional craniotomy, neuroendoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma has the advantages of better curative effect and lower incidence of postoperative complications in the treatment of hypertension-related intracerebral hemorrhage. The history of hypertension above 10 years, bleeding volume above 50 mL, breaking into the ventricle and preoperative GCS score are the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation.
目的 观察独用内镜下手术以及联合等离子低温射频治疗外耳道乳头状瘤的疗效。 方法 2006年7月-2010年7月,随机将收治的45例外耳道乳头状瘤患者(150只耳)分组,比较独用内镜下手术组(A组)以及联合等离子低温射频组(B组)治疗外耳道乳头状瘤的疗效。 结果 患者均术后成功随访1~3年,48只患耳无复发及恶变,2只患耳3个月后复发。 结论 内镜下手术联合等离子低温射频治疗外耳道乳头状瘤具有微创,手术彻底有效,防止复发的优点,值得临床广泛应用。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for L5/S1 disc herniation via transforaminal approach (TF-PELD) versus interlaminar approach (IL-PELD).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the cohort studies of TF-PELD versus IL-PELD for L5/S1 disc herniation from inception to October 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 1 RCT and 7 cohort studies involving 414 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that: compared with IL-PELD group, TF-PELD group had longer operative time (MD=17.42, 95%CI 12.86 to 21.97, P<0.000 01) and more frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy (MD=8.42, 95%CI 6.18 to 10.65,P<0.000 01), respectively. However, there were no significant differences between two groups in the post-operative visual analogue scale (MD=0.01, 95%CI –0.23 to 0.25,P=0.94), the post-operative Oswestry disability index (MD=–0.46, 95%CI –2.42 to 1.49, P=0.64), the excellent and good outcomes rate (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.12, P=0.96), and the rate of complications (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.18, P=0.20).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that TF-PELD and IL-PELD are equally effective and safe for L5/S1 disc herniation, but IL-PELD is superior to TF-PELD in less operative time and less radiation exposure. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.