ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between laminoplasty and laminectomy compression and fusion with internal fixation to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy. MethodsBetween September 2006 and September 2009, 143 cases of multilevel cervical myelopathy (the affected segments were more than 3) were treated by laminoplasty in 87 cases (group A) and by laminectomy decompression and fusion with lateral mass screw fixation in 56 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, pathological type, and affected segments between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, improvement of neurological function [Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) 17 score], and the incidences of complications were observed; the cervical curvature index (CCI), range of motion (ROM), and symptoms of neck and shoulder pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) scores] were recorded and compared. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 18-30 months (mean, 24 months). C5 nerve root palsy occurred in 4 cases (4.60%) of group A and in 5 cases (8.93%) of group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.475, P=0.482). No complication of deep infection, pseudarthrosis, or screw loosening occurred. No closure of opened laminae was observed in group A; and no screw extrusion, breakage, or nerve injury was observed in group B. At last follow-up, neck axial symptoms appeared in 35 cases (40.23%) of group A and in 11 cases (19.64%) of group B, showing significant difference (χ2=6.612, P=0.009). No significant difference was found in JOA score, CCI, ROM, or VAS scores between 2 groups at preoperation (P gt; 0.05); the JOA score, ROM, and VAS scores of groups A and B and CCI of group A at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in the JOA score, improvement rate, and VAS score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05); however, significant differences were found in ROM and CCI between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in pain intensity, lifting, work, reaction, driving, and total score between 2 groups at last follow-up. ConclusionLaminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation can effectively relieve pain, but it will greatly reduce the ROM; laminoplasty has less complications and satisfactory outcome. The two methods have similar effectiveness in the improvement of neurological function.
目的:讨论侧后方减压融合术治疗胸腰椎骨折的优缺点及临床应用。方法:对12例胸腰椎骨折采用侧后方减压植骨融合术,经一个手术入路完成减压及脊椎的稳定重建。 结果:12例病例随访13～36个月,术后无一例神经症状加重;6例术后原有神经症状明显改善,2例2个月后神经症状开始恢复,3例无改善;12例均获得骨性融合。 结论:侧后方减压融合术是治疗胸腰椎骨折的较好方法。但其技术要求高,视野显露有限,操作范围较窄,易出血增加了手术难度。
ObjectiveTo compare the effect on adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for treatment of cervical spondylosis. MethodsBetween August 2009 and February 2012, 60 cases of single segmental cervical spondylosis accorded with the inclusion criteria were included. Of 60 patients, 28 patients underwent CDA (CDA group) and 32 patients underwent ACDF (ACDF group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, pathological type, pathological segment, the time of conservation treatment, preoperative neck disability index (NDI), preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and degeneration of the adjacent segment and disc between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The NDI and JOA score were used to evaluate effectiveness. The range of motion (ROM) of adjacent segment was measured, and degeneration of the adjacent segment and disc was evaluated according to Kellgren grading system based on X-ray and Miyazaki grading system based on T2-weighted MRI, respectively. ResultsThe follow-up time was 24-50 months (mean, 34 months) in 2 groups. All patients had no complication of prosthesis loosening, dislocation, or fracture of plate. The NDI and JOA scores from 12 months after operation were significantly improved compared with preoperative scores in 2 groups (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found at each time point between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The improvement rate of JOA was 80.68%±4.01% in ACDF group and was 79.44%±3.76% in CDA group at last follow-up, showing no significant difference (t=1.237, P=0.221). And the improvement rate of JOA in 2 groups were excellent. There was no significant difference in ROM and degeneration grading of adjacent segments between at last follow-up and at pre-operation in 2 groups (P > 0.05), and between 2 groups at pre-operation and at last follow-up (P > 0.05). The degeneration grading of disc at last follow-up showed significant difference in 2 groups compared with preoperative ones (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (Z=0.132, P=0.895). ConclusionBoth CDA and ACDF can achieve good effectiveness in treating cervical spondylosis, but CDA can not significantly slow down the degeneration of adjacent segment disc.
Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) treatment for cervical spondylosis has been more than half a century, and achieved good clinical results. However, with the continuous extension of follow-up time, the fusion segment-associated postoperative complications emerged gradually. Reserved cervical stability and activity, the concept of non-fusion was born. As a non-fusion technique, cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) developed rapidly. With the continuous development of artificial prosthesis materials and design concepts, and specification and proficiency of surgical procedures, CADR has achieved better short- and mid-term clinical efficacy than ACDF. Compared with ACDF, the main advantages of CADR are that the postoperative recovery is quick, the activity and stability of cervical vertebra are maintained, the height of cervical intervertebral space is restored, and the stress of adjacent segments and the rate of surgical renovation are reduced. In clinical work, as an emerging technology, CADR requires spine surgeons to control the surgical indications, contraindications, and patients’ conditions strictly. This article reviews the research progress of CADR in order to provide new ideas for clinical treatment of cervical spondylosis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation combined with spinal fusion for lumbar disc degeneration.MethodsThe clinical data of 39 patients with two-level lumbar disc degeneration who met the selection criteria between June 2010 and December 2011 was retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into group A (20 cases, simple lumbar decompression and fusion) and group B (19 cases, Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation combined with spinal fusion) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference in age, gender, disease diagnosis, lesion segment, disease duration, Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the intervertebral height, foramen intervertebral height (FIH), and range of motion (ROM) of upper operative segment and adjacent segment between the two groups (P>0.05). ODI and VAS score were used to evaluate the effectiveness before operation and at last follow-up, and the improvement rates were calculated. The intervertebral height [anterior disc height (ADH), middle disc height (MDH), and posterior disc height (PDH)], FIH, and ROM were measured and compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss in group A were significantly more than those in group B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in hospitalization time between the two groups (t=0.992, P=0.328). All patients were followed up; the follow-up time was 33-50 months (mean, 40.5 months) in group A and 39-51 months (mean, 42.6 months) in group B. No complication such as displacement, loosening, or rupture of internal fixator was found in both groups. At last follow-up, ODI and VAS score of the two groups significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in ODI, VAS score, and improvement rate of ODI between the two groups (P>0.05); the improvement rate of VAS score in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (t=2.245, P=0.031). There was no significant difference in the intervertebral height and FIH of the upper operative segment at last follow-up between the two groups and between preoperation and last follow-up in the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the ADH of adjacent segment in group B was significantly higher than that in group A, and MDH, PDH, and FIH were significantly lower than those in group A (P<0.05). Compared with preoperation, the ADH of adjacent segment in group A decreased and MDH, PDH, and FIH increased at last follow-up (P<0.05), while all indexes in group B did not change significantly (P>0.05). The ROM of adjacent segment in group A increased significantly at last follow-up (t=2.318, P=0.026). There was significant difference in ROM of adjacent segment between the two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionThe mid-term effectiveness of Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation combined with spinal fusion is similar to that of simple decompression fusion. For those patients whose adjacent segments of the responsible segments have degeneration but have no symptoms or mild symptoms, this treatment can slow down the adjacent segment degeneration.
ObjectiveTo compare differences in the maintenance of cervical curvature after anterior cervical surgery between zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage and plate-cage construct (PCC).MethodsA clinical data of 100 patients with single-segment cervical disc herniation who were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion were retrospectively analyzed between January 2015 and January 2016. Among them, 50 patients were treated with the zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage (group A) and 50 patients with the PCC (group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, bone mineral density, disease duration, operative segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The postoperative VAS and JOA scores were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. The C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height were measured on lateral X-ray films, and the interbody fusion was evaluated according to Pitzen’s criteria.ResultsThe operation time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (t=2.442, P=0.021), but there was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (t=0.812, P=0.403). All patients were followed up 24-36 months, with an average of 28.5 months. According to Pitzen’s criteria for cervical interbody fusion, bone fusion achieved in both groups. The VAS score, JOA score, C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height of the two groups at 1 and 24 months after operation were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). The C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height of group A at 24 months changed significantly compared with those at 1 month (P<0.05). The other indexes of the two groups showed no significant difference between the different time points after operation (P>0.05). There were significant differences in C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height between the two groups at 24 months after operation (P<0.05); but there was no significant difference in the clinical indexes at 1 and 24 months and the imaging indexes at 1 month between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with the PCC, the zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage can significantly shorten the operation time and obtain the same clinical efficacy, but the intervertebral height loss and secondary cervical curvature change after operation is more serious.
ObjectiveTo summarize the characteristics of the learning curve and the occurrence of postoperative adverse events during the development of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique by comparing the clinical data of early and late patients treated with UBE technique. Methods All patients who underwent single-level UBE technique between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were selected as the research subjects. According to the surgical options, all patients were allocated into 3 groups: unilateral decompression and discectomy (UDD) group, unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) group, and lumbar intervertebral fusion (LIF) group. The first 60 cases from each group were extracted and ranked orderly. The endoscopic operation time, the times of fluoroscopy during non-internal fixation implantation, the postoperative hospital stay, the drainage volume, the decrease of hemoglobin, the decrease of hematocrit, and the adverse events were collected. In each group, the patients were allocated into early and late cases according to the operation sequence. The first 30 cases of each group were classified as early cases, and the last 30 cases as late cases. Statistical analysis was performed on the above observation indicators between the early and late cases, and a scatter plot of relevant data changes was drawn to observe the change trend. Results Compared with the early cases, the endoscopic operation time and the times of fluoroscopy during non-internal fixation implantation of late cases in each group were significantly lower (P<0.05); the postoperative hospital stay of late cases in LIF group was significantly shorter (P<0.05); the decreased values of hemoglobin and hematokrit of late cases in ULBD group and LIF group were significantly lower (P<0.05); the postoperative drainage volume of late cases in ULBD group significantly decreased (P<0.05). The endoscopic operation time and the times of fluoroscopy during non-internal fixation implantation of 3 groups showed a significant downward trend. The adverse events occurred in 3 early cases and 1 late case of the UDD group, in 6 and 3 cases of the UBLD group, and 8 and 3 cases of the LIF group, respectively. The difference was not significant between the early and late cases (P>0.05). Conclusion In the early practice of UBE technique, there is a high incidence of complication, and the surgical trauma is relatively large, which is related to the lack of understanding of the UBE technique characteristics and insufficient surgical experience. With the proficiency of surgical techniques and accumulation of experience, the operation time and the incidence of postoperative adverse events were significantly reduced.
Objective To analyze the learning curve of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF). Methods Fifty-five patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with UBE-LIF between December 2020 and February 2022 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were grouped according to the operation sequence, the first 27 cases were in the early group, and the last 28 cases were in the late group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, disease type, and surgical segment distribution (P>0.05). The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss (the difference between 1 day before operation and 3 days after operation), the hospital stay after operation, and the incidence of perioperative complications were recorded; the learning curve of UBE-LIF was analyzed by log-curve regression analysis. Results All the operations were successfully completed without changing to other operations. The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss, and hospital stay in the early group were significantly more than those in the late group (P<0.05). Complications occurred in 2 cases (7.4%) in the early group, including 1 case of dural tear during operation and 1 case of epidural hematoma after operation, and 1 case (3.6%) with transient radiculitis in the late group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.518) . The log-curve regression analysis showed that the operation time decreased significantly with the increase of the number of patients (P<0.05). The operation time tended to be stable after the surgeon completed 17 cases. ConclusionFor single-level lumbar degenerative disease, the operation time of UBE-LIF can decrease gradually with the increase of the number of patients, and tend to be stable after 17 cases.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of applying self-stabilizing zero-profile three-dimensional (3D) printed artificial vertebral bodies in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 37 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent single-level ACCF using either self-stabilizing zero-profile 3D-printed artificial vertebral bodies (n=15, treatment group) or conventional 3D-printed artificial vertebral bodies with titanium plates (n=22, control group) between January 2022 and February 2023. There was no significant difference in age, gender, lesion segment, disease duration, and preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). Operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, hospitalization costs, JOA score and improvement rate, incidence of postoperative prosthesis subsidence, and interbody fusion were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the treatment group had significantly shorter operation time and lower hospitalization costs (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up, with a follow-up period of 6-21 months in the treatment group (mean, 13.7 months) and 6-19 months in the control group (mean, 12.7 months). No dysphagia occurred in the treatment group, while 5 cases occurred in the control group, with a significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia between the two groups (P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, both groups showed improvement in JOA scores compared to preoperative scores, with significant differences (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the JOA scores and improvement rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Radiographic examinations showed the interbody fusion in both groups, and the difference in the time of interbody fusion was not significant (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 2 cases in the treatment group and 3 cases in the control group experienced prosthesis subsidence, with no significant difference in the incidence of prosthesis subsidence (P>0.05). There was no implant displacement or plate-screw fracture during follow-up.Conclusion The use of self-stabilizing zero-profile 3D-printed artificial vertebral bodies in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy not only achieves similar effectiveness to 3D-printed artificial vertebral bodies, but also reduces operation time and the incidence of postoperative dysphagia.