Objective To investigate and analyze the cognition of intraspinal labor analgesia (ILA) of women in labor and its influencing factors. Methods A total of 322 women in labor in West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University between May and September 2015 were investigated by questionnaire, which included the general situation, the pregnancy status, the understanding for labor pain, and the cognition of ILA. Investigator introduced the knowledge of ILA to them after the investigation, and then they were re-investigated for the choice of ILA. Results Only 22.67% of these women in labor knowed ILA clearly, 53.42% heared it but did not understand, and 49.38% liked to use it. The proportion of women in labor who liked to use it increased to 81.89% after introduction, and the difference was significant (P<0.001). Among all factors, the acknowledgement level of ILA and the choice to use it were mainly related to the family awareness concept for labor pain. Conclusions The cognition of ILA of women in labor is not enough, and their using desire is not strong. The family awareness concept is one of the important factors. The education and advertise to the women in labor and their family members after admiting to labor room can increase the choice rate of ILA significantly.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of local versus systemic application of opioids for labor analgesia. Methods We searched PubMed (1966 to January 2008), EMBASE (1980 to January 2008), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2008), CBM (1978 to January 2008), CNKI (1979 to January 2008) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving local versus systemic application of opioids for labor analgesia. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results A total of 12 trials involving 5909 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed that local application of opioids was superior to systemic application in terms of maternal satisfaction with pain relief during labor (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.09). No significant difference was found between the two groups in the incidence of low neonatal Apgar score at 5 minutes (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.01). Conclusion Local application of opioids for labor analgesia appears to be more effective than systematic use in reducing pain during labor. But as for safety concerns, maternal and neonatal adverse effects are observed in both groups. Thus, more high-quality and large-scale RCTs are needed.
【摘要】目的观察低浓度罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的效果。方法2007年5月8月按入选标准选择100例产妇,随机分成试验组和对照组,每组50例。试验组分娩前给予低浓度罗哌卡因加舒芬太尼,对照组不行无痛分娩,通过视觉模拟评分法等指标观察镇痛效果。结果试验组镇痛后视觉模拟评分较对照组低(Plt;0.05);两组镇痛期间血压、心率差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05),新生儿Apgar评分比较无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。结论联合应用罗哌卡因和舒芬太尼用于硬膜外分娩镇痛能取得较好的效果,值得在临床中推广应用。
Objective To study the special traits of primiparae’s compliance with labor analgesia, so as to offer individualized analgesia solutions during spontaneous labor. Methods The uniparous primiparae with cephalic presentation between gestational weeks 38 and 40 were divided into two groups based on their educational background (college education or above, and high school education or below), each group with 20 cases. The demographical statistics of the two groups including their State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) grading, PCA results, and delivery situation were recorded and analyzed. Results Differences in age, height, and weight were not statisticallysignificant (Pgt;0.05); differences in T-AI were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05); differences in S-AI were statistically significant (Plt;0.05); differences in anxiety and numbers of adding anesthetics were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05); differences in failure to tolerate labor pains and requiring caesarean section were statistically significant (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Primiparae with higher educational degree tend to have higher S-AI grading and perform poorly in compliance with labor analgesia.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of doula delivery on postpartum depression.MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data databases to collect relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effect of doula delivery on postpartum depression from inception to March 24th, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 19 RCTs involving 10 921 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the doula delivery could reduce the incidence of postpartum depression (RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.46, P<0.001), and SDS score in doula delivery group was superior to that in the control group (MD=–7.37, 95%CI –11.01 to –3.72, P<0.001).ConclusionThe current evidence shows that doula delivery can reduce the incidence of postpartum depression. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusion is still needed to be verified by more high quality studies.