Objective To systematically review the clinical effectiveness and safety of programmable valves (PV) vs. standard valves (SV) for hydrocephalus. Methods Literature search was conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data to collect both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized concurrent controlled trials on hydrocephalus treated by PV and SV published from January 1992 to January 2012. According to the inclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated and cross-checked the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 11 non-randomized concurrent controlled trials involving 1,485 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with SV, PV was superior in overall effective rate (RR=1.14, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.27, P=0.01), 2-year survival rate (RR=1.25, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.51, P=0.02), secondary surgery rate (RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.73, Plt;0.001), overall complications rate (RR=0.62, 95%CI 0.51 to 0.76, Plt;0.001), and over-drainage/ under-drainage rates (RR=0.42, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.83, P=0.01). But there were no significant differences in 1-year survival rate (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.19, P=0.55), postoperative infection rate (RR=1.08, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.60, P=0.71) and valve related complication rate (RR=0.80, 95%CI 0.56 to 1.21, P=0.20) between the two groups. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that PV is superior to SV in increasing the effective rate, decreasing complications, and prolonging the long-term survival rate. Because of the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality, multicenter and double-blind RCTs are needed to prove whether PV can be clinically recommended as a preferred drainage surgery or not.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculal peritoneum shunt (VPS) for hydrocephalus. Methods A fully recursive literature search was conducted in PubMed (1996 to June, 2011), EMBASE (1996 to June, 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2011), CBM (1996 to June, 2011), CNKI and Wanfang Database (1996 to June, 2011) in any language. The randomized or non-randomized controlled trials of hydrocephalus treated by endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculal peritoneum shunt were considered for inclusion. The analyzed outcome variables were overall complications and the survival rate of all time points. Data related to clinical outcomes were extracted by two reviewers independently. Statistical analyses were carried out by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Nine published reports of eligible studies involving 1 187 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with VPS, ETV had no significant differences in short-term (1 or 2 years) survival rate (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.16, P=0.74; RR=1.14, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.30, P=0.06), but there were significant differences between the two groups in overall complication rate (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.89, P=0.001), postoperative 3-year survival rate (RR=1.23, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.41, P=0.004), and postoperative 5-year survival rate (RR=1.14, 95%CI 1.29 to 1.66, P=0.05). So the outcomes indicated ETV was superior in controlling the overall complication rate and prolonging the long-term survival rate. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that endoscopic third ventriculostomy is superior to ventriculal peritoneum shunt in reducing the overall complications and prolonging the long-term survival rate, but there is no significant difference in short-term survival rate between the two methods. The effectiveness of the two operational methods for hydrocephalus caused by all specific reasons still has to be further proved by more high-quality, multi-centered and double-blind RCTs.
目的 总结经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术（TIPS）治疗未合并肝癌的门静脉高压症患者行脾切除术后反复上消化道出血的疗效。方法 对未合并肝癌或胆管癌的门静脉高压症合并上消化道大出血患者行脾切除术后复发出血患者行TIPS术治疗，并随访1～5年（平均3.2年）的资料进行总结与分析。结果 36例脾切除术后再出血者行TIPS术， 手术均获成功，围手术期死亡率为2.78％（1/36），死亡原因是肝性脑病。随访期间患者术后再次复发出血率为5.71％（2/35）。结论 TIPS对脾切除治疗门静脉高压症后反复出血病例的效果良好。
Objective To explore the effect of endovascular treatment guided by ultrasonography combined with portosystemic shunts on the patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome （BCS）.Methods The clinical data of 136 patients with BCS treated by balloon angioplasty and stent implantation guided by Doppler ultrasonography in our hospital from January 1995 to January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.After balloon angioplasty,53 patients were treated by inferior vena cava （IVC） stent implantation and 31 patients with hepatic venous occlusion underwent portosystemic shunts （PSSs） at one week after endovascular treatment.The long-and short-term effects after treatment were studied.Results After endovascular procedures,the IVC pressure of patients significantly decreased （P＜0.01）,while IVC diameter, flow velocity in the lesion,and right atrial pressure of patients showed significant increase（P＜0.01）.Slight heart dysfunction appeared in 13 cases of patients.After shunting,acute pancreatitis occurred in 3 cases, and 1 patient died of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage on the 10 d after PSSs.Doppler ultrasonography for IVC and shunt vessels showed：the swollen liver and spleen lessened on 3d after endovascular procedures.The swollen liver lessened 2-7cm （mean 5.5cm）,swollen spleen lessened 3-8cm （mean 5.8cm）, and the time of ascites disappearance was 3-60d （mean 14d）.All the patients were followed up for 1 month to 15 years with an average of 3 years.Restenosis of the distal part of stent was found in 1 patient in 2 years after operation, hepatic vein occlusion occurred in 1 case in 1 year after treatment,hepatocellular carcinoma occurred in 1 patient in 3 years after stent implantation,and 1 patient died of C type hepatitis after 1 year,and 5 out of 6 cases of patients with infertility had babies after 1 year.All patients had no stent migration or occlusion of shunts and the symptoms of portal hypertension were obviously relieved.Conclusions Endovascular treatment guided by Doppler ultrasonography is a convenient,safe,and effective method for BCS.Portosystemic shunts are commended to patients with hepatic venous occlusions.The above mentioned methods provide a feasible and effective means for IVC stenosis and short segment occlusion with hepatic vein occlusion of BCS.
Objective To explore the clinical presentation and diagnosis and treatment of prehepatic portal hypertension （PPH） and discuss its surgical strategies. Methods Forty-six cases of PPH treated in the 2nd Artillery General Hospital and Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2000 to May 2009 were analyzed retrospectively, including 2 cases of Abernethy abnormality. All patients were evaluated by indirect portal vein angiography, CT angiography and (or) portal duplex system Doppler ultrasonography before treament. Surgical strategies included: 23 cases with meso-caval shunt, 8 cases with splenectomy and spleno-renal vein shunt, 1 case with porta-caval shunt, 2 cases with paraumbilical vein-jugular vein shunt, 3 cases with portal azygous disconnection, 1 cases with splenectomy and portal azygous disconnection, 1 case with sigmoidostomy and closed the fistula of sigmoid six months later, 1 case with resection of part of small intestine due to acute extensive thrombosis of portal vein system, 4 cases with selective superior mesenteric artery and (or) splenic artery thrombolytic infusion therapy, 2 cases remained no-surgical option and underwent conservative treatment. Results Forty-four patients were followed-up from 2 months to 5 years， average of 23.4 months, one patient without surgical treatment was lost. Satisfactory outcomes were obtained in 34 patients with various shunts, which expressed as a release of hypersplenism and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Two cases were treated with meso-caval shunt because of rehemorrhage in month 13 and 24 and one died in month 8 after disconnection, one died on day 40 after thrombolytic therapy due to putrescence of intestines, one who remained no-surgical option underwent hemorrhage 4 months later, and then went well by conservative treatment. Conclusion The key of treatment of PPH is to reduce the pressure of hepatic portal vein. Surgical managements of shunt and selective superior mesenteric artery and (or) splenic artery thrombolytic infusion therapy are safe and effective, but individual treatment strategy should be performed.
Objective To summarize the experience of laparoscopic ventriculo-peritoneal shunt for treating patients with hydrocephalus. Methods Twenty-two cases with hydrocephalus were treated with laparoscopic ventriculo-peritoneal shunt.The drainage-tube was put into the right liver-diaphragm interspace in 9 patients and inserted into the pelvic kidney in the others. Postoperative complications, ameliorating conditions of intracranial hypertension and recovery conditions of these patients were observed. Results All the operations were succeeded and the patients got amelioration of intracranial hypertension.No complication correlating with laparoscopic surgery occured. Conclusion Laparoscopic ventriculo-peritoneal shunt have the advantages of less invasive,better intra-abdominal view and more rapid recovery than conventional laparotomy. It’s a safe and feasible method which is worth of wide using.
目的探讨防止限制性门腔静脉侧侧分流术后吻合口扩大的方法。方法对32例肝硬变门脉高压症患者行限制性门腔静脉分流术，术中采用不吸收缝线连续缝合门腔静脉吻合口前后壁形成自然的限制环，以防止术后吻合口的扩大。结果32例患者于术后3～36个月行彩超或螺旋CT检查，显示门腔静脉吻合口均无扩大； 术后再出血率为3.1%（1/32），肝性脑病发生率为6.3%（2/32）； 术后≤6个月时肝功能均有不同程度改善，与术前比较其差异有显著性（P＜0.001）； 全部病例随访6~49个月，随访率为100%。结论改良的限制性门腔静脉侧侧分流术是治疗肝硬变门脉高压症的有效方法。