目的:探讨经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗高危良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的术中、术后常见并发症的原因、预防及治疗,提高手术安全性和有效性。方法: 回顾性分析62例高龄合并心肺疾患的前列腺增生症患者行经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)的临床资料。结果: 62例排尿困难症状均改善,其中1例出现暂时性尿失禁,2月后好转,尿路感染7例,消炎治疗后好转,5例出现肉眼血尿,做对症处理后血尿消失,无输血病例,无经尿道电切综合征(TURS)发生。结论:采用TURP是良性前列腺增生症安全有效的外科治疗方法,疗效满意,并发症少,安全性高,住院时间短,费用低。
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1 470 nm laser vaporization vs. transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of 1 470 nm laser vaporization vs. TURP for BPH from inception to October 22nd, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 6 RCTs and 4 non-RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: 1 470 nm laser vaporization was superior to TURP in reducing intraoperative bleeding (MD=−103.87, 95%CI −148.08 to −59.65, P<0.000 01), hospital stay (MD=−3.82, 95%CI −4.35 to −3.28, P<0.000 01), postoperative indwelling catheter time (MD=−2.24, 95%CI −3.45 to −1.02, P=0.000 3), postoperative hemoglobin (MD=−1.63, 95%CI −3.14 to −0.12, P=0.03) and rate of secondary hemorrhage (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.48, P=0.002). There were no significant differences in operative time, bladder irrigation time, transient urinary incontinence and urethral stricture, IPSS Score and Qmax at 3 months after operation between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that 1 470 nm laser vaporization is superior to TURP in reducing intraoperative bleeding and secondary hemorrhage. It may be more suitable for prostate surgery in anticoagulant or coagulative dysfunction patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
摘要:目的:探讨良性前列腺增生经尿道前列腺电切术围手术期的护理经验。方法:回顾性分析96例良性前列腺增生患者临床资料。结果:96例患者手术顺利,围手术期经周密的护理,疗效满意,无明显并发症。结论:周密的手术期护理对经尿道前列腺电切术治疗老年良性前列腺增生十分重要。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the perioperative nursing care of transurethral prostatic resection (TURP). Methods: The data of 96 TURP cases were analyzed retrospectively. Results: All the operations were performed successfully, and there were no obvious complications among the patients with precise nursing care. Conclusion: It is very important for precise nursing care to the patients who underwent TURP.
目的:探讨微创治疗BPH并发膀胱结石的方法。方法:应用气压弹道碎石术联合TURP治疗BPH并发膀胱结石26例。结果:24例一次成功,1例一期碎石,二期行TURP;1例中转开放手术。结论:气压弹道碎石术联合TURP治疗BPH并发膀胱结石创伤小,恢复快,安全高效。
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of clinical nursing pathway on rehabilitation indicators in patients who had undergone transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). MethodsA total of 241 patients underwent TURP between July 2010 and March 2014 were randomly divided into path group (121 cases) and control group (120 cases). The nursing results of the two groups were observed. ResultsThe complication rate of bladder spasm, secondary hemorrhage, urethral stricture in path group were lower than those in the control group with significant differences (P<0.05). ConclusionThe performance of clinical nursing pathway on TURP patients may reduce the complications rate, and promote the health economics indicators and quality of care.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder cancer and prostate (TURBT+TURP) in the treatment of bladder cancer with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP from inception to January 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies investigating the efficacy and safety of TURBT with TURP in the treatment of bladder cancer with BPH. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results3 A total of 3 RCTs (n=137) and 10 retrospective cohort studies (n=998) were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the simultaneous resection group and the control group in the overall recurrence rate (RCT:OR=0.55, 95% CI:0.24 to 1.24, P=0.15; retrospective cohort study:OR=0.78, 95% CI:0.60 to 1.01, P=0.06), postoperative recurrence rate in the prostatic fossa/urethra (RCT:OR=1.40, 95% CI:0.28 to 7.60, P=0.68; retrospective cohort study:OR=1.36, 95% CI:0.49 to 3.74, P=0.55), progression rate (OR=0.93, 95% CI:0.53 to 1.61, P=0.79) and overall perioperative complication rate (RCT:OR=0.35, 95% CI:0.08 to 1.55, P=0.17; retrospective cohort study:OR=0.1.75, 95% CI:0.44 to 6.98, P=0.43). ConclusionCompared with only TURBT or sequential TURBT and TURP, simultaneous TURBT and TURP do not increase the overall recurrence rate, postoperative recurrence rate in the prostatic fossa/urethra, progression rate and overall postoperative complication rate. However, due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, larger sample size and higher quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.