【摘要】 目的 探讨低位下颈椎前方入路联合胸骨柄劈开术治疗颈胸段脊柱结核的手术方式及术后疗效。 方法 2002年3月-2009年7月收治颈胸段脊柱结核16例，男11例，女5例；年龄18~52岁，平均38岁。其中位于颈6-胸1者2例，颈7-胸1者5例，胸1-2者4例，胸2-3者3例，胸1-3者2例。神经功能Frankel分级为：B级4例，C级7例，D级3例，E级2例。手术行低位下颈椎前方入路联合胸骨柄劈开术，术中彻底清除结核肉芽组织、脓液、死骨并进行脊髓减压，取自体髂骨块植骨重建中前柱、前方钛板内固定。术后佩戴头颈胸支具6个月，正规抗痨18个月。术前后凸Cobb角为25~60°，平均为37.5°。 结果 全部患者均获得随访，随访时间2~8年，平均3年。均获得骨性融合，融合时间为5～8个月，无螺钉松动、脱落及钢板断裂等并发症发生。神经功能恢复按Frankel分级，平均改善3.6个级别；结核病变无复发，术后后凸Cobb角明显改善，为15～35°，平均22.6°，末次随访后凸角无明显丢失。1例术后出现暂时性声音嘶哑，术后1个月恢复。 结论 低位下颈椎前方入路联合胸骨柄劈开术治疗颈胸段脊柱结核，病灶显露充分，植骨内固定，重建脊柱稳定性，矫正后凸畸形可靠。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of cervico-thoracic junction spinal tuberculosis (CTJST) and to observe the therapeutic effect of lower anterior cervical approach combined with presternum-splitting approach on CTJST. Methods The clinical data of 16 patients with cervicothoracic junction spinal tuberculosis from Match 2002 to July 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the Frankel grades, four patients were in grade B, seven were in grade C, three were in grade D, and two were in grade E. There were 11 males and five females with a average age of 38 years ranging from 18 to 52 years. All patients underwent radical excision of epidural granulation tissue/abscess and necrotic bone, whilst a proper tricortical iliac crest autograft and anterior titanium plate were placed to reconstruct the anteromedian spinal column, followed by chemotherapy for 18 months and immobilization in a brace for six months. The mean Cobb angle was 37.5° (ranged from 25° to 60°) before surgery. Results All patients were followed up for two to eight years (three years on average), and got complete bone fusion within five to eight months postoperatively. There were no pull out and breakage of screws or plates.Spinal cord functional recovery improved on average 3.6 degree according Frankel standard, without recurrence of the disease or loss of Cobb angle till the last follow up. There was a statistically significant improvement in the Cobb angles from 22.6° to 37.5° (Plt;0.01) in average. However, two patients appeared transient hoarse voice after surgery, and the symptoms were alleviated one month after the operation. Conclusion Lower anterior cervical approach combined with presternum-splitting approach for CTJST may provide adequate exposure to the lesion, keep the bone graft with internal fixation and spinal stability, and correct the kyphosis.
Objective To evaluate the effect of anterolateral approach in treating thoracolumbar disc protrusion. Methods From May 2004 to May 2008, 11 patients with thoracolumbar disc protrusion (T10-L3) underwent discectomy, autologous il iac bone graft, and internal fixation via anterolateral approach. There were 9 males and 2 females aged 26-57 years old (average 42.8 years old). The course of disease was 1 week-11 years (average 2.7 years). Nine patients showed the lower l imbs weakness, 8 had sensory disturbance, 6 presented with lumbodorsal pain, 5 had the lower l imb pain, 4 presentedwith sphincter muscle disturbance, 3 suffered from foot drop, and 5 had a history of lower back injury. X-ray, CT, and MRI test showed that 9 cases had the single-segmental protrusion, 2 cases had double-segmental protrusion, 2 cases were accompanied with ossification of the thoracic vertebra yellow l igament, 2 cases were combined with ossification of the vertebra posterior longitudinal l igament, and 1 was compl icated with Scheuermann disease. Preoperatively, the intervertebral height was (7.2 ± 1.3) mm and JOA score was 6.4 ± 2.8. Results The time of operation was 2.5-5.5 hours (average 3.5 hours); the blood loss during operation was 500-1 200 mL (average 750 mL). During operation, intraoperative pleural tear occurred in 1 patient, peritoneal tear in 1 patient, and dural laceration in 1 patient. Repairing was performed intraoperative and preventive suction drainage was used for 3-5 days. No postoperative hydropneumothorax and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred. All incisions healed by first intention. No postoperative compl ications of nerve system occurred. All the patients were followed up for 1-4 years (average 2.4 years). X-ray films showed that all the patients achieved bony fusion without the occurrence breakage and loosening of titanium plate and screw 6-9 months after operation. Three cases displayed subtle scol iosis (10-15°) without influence on spinal equil ibration. The intervertebral height increased to (12.3 ± 1.5) mm 2 weeks after operation, indicating there was a significant difference compared with preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The intervertebral height 1 year after operation when the bony fusion was reached decreased to (7.5 ± 1.2) mm, indicating there was no significant difference compared to the preoperative value (P gt; 0.05). The JOA score increased to 7.6 ± 3.2 at 1 year after operation, indicating there was a significant difference compared with preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The symptoms and signs of all the patients were improved to various degrees after operation. According to improvement rate evaluation system proposed by Hirabayashi t al., 4 cases were graded as excellent, 6 as good, 1 as fair, and the excellent and good rate was 90.9%. Conclusion Treating thoracolumbar disc protrusion via anterolateral approach is safe and effective.
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effectof the modified anterior approach in treatment of the patients with cervicothoracic junction spinal lesions. Methods From September 2000 to January 2005, 23 patients (15 males, 8 females) with spinal lesions in the cervicothoracic junction underwent a standard cervical approach, which was combined with apartial median steotomy and transverse steotomy through the synostosis between the manubrium and body of the sternum to expose the lesion adequately. Among thepatients, 3 had fracture, 7 had dislocation, 6 had tuberculosis, and 7 had tumor. The pathologic change regions was as follows: 2 in the C6-T1 segment, 2in the C6-T2 segment, 3 in the C7-T1 segment, 3 in the T3 segment, 8 in the T1 segment, and 5 in the T2egment. The classification of Frankel were as follows: 2 at grade A, 4 at grade B, 7 at grade C, 4 at grade D, and 6 at grade E. All the patients underwent a radical excision of the affected spinal bone, were given a proper tricortical iliac crest and anterior instrumentation to reconstruct the anterior spinal column, followed by immobilization in a brace for 3-6 months. Results The mean followup period was 30 months (range, 1042 months). Bony fusion was obtained in all the patients.One patient died of pulmonary cancer metastasis 10 months after operation. The nerve function of the spinal cord recovered at different degrees (1 at grade A, None at grade B, 2 at grade C, 10 at grade D, 10 at grade E). Conclusion Ourmodified anterior approach can provide a direct and safe access to the lesions in the region.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of anterolateral approach for L5 vertebral resection, bone grafting, and screw rod fixation by imaging and biomechanics researches. Methods Twenty formalized adult cadavers (12 males and 8 females) were randomly divided into 2 groups; L5 vertebral resection, bone graft, and screw rod fixation was performed on 10 specimens by using anterolateral approach (experimental group), and on the other 10 specimens by combined anterior and posterior approach. CT scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction were performed in the experimental group; preoperative maximal safe entry angle and depth of screws and intraoperative actual entry angle and depth of screws were measured; the sacral screw position was observed after operation. The biomechanical test was done in 2 groups. Results Twenty specimens smoothly underwent L5 excision and reconstruction. CT scan showed that there was no significant difference in maximal safe entry angle and depth of screws between males and females in experimental group before operation (P>0.05); the maximal safe entry angle and depth were 51.93° and 47.88 mm for anterior screw, and were 37.04° and 46.28 mm for posterior screw. After operation, depth of the sacral anterior and posterior screws were appropriate, which did not pierce into the spinal canal. The biomechanical test results indicated that the flexion, extension, and lateral flexion displacements, and vertical compression stiffness showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For L5 lesions not invading posterior column, to use L5 vertebral resection, bone graft, and screw rod fixation by anterolateral approach is a safe and feasible method to reconstruct lumbosacral stability, with the advantages of no changing posture, less operation time and incision, and prevention of bone graft shift, but effectiveness need further be identified.
Objective To compare the differences in acetabular position during total hip arthroplasty (THA) between by direct anterior approach and by posterolateral approach. Methods Between December 2008 and December 2015, 102 patients undergoing THA were included in the study. THA was performed by anterior approach in 51 cases (anterior group) and by posterolateral approach in 51 cases (posterolateral group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, and cause of illness between 2 groups (P>0.05), with comparability. The acetabular abduction angle and anteversion angel were measured on the X-ray film at 1 day after operation to evaluate whether the acetabular prosthesis was displaced in the safe zone. Results The acetabular abduction angle was (42.28±5.77)° in the anterior group and was (43.93±7.44)° in the posterolateral group, showing no significant difference (t=1.30, P=0.19). The acetabular anteversion angle was (21.14±5.17)° in the anterior group and was (21.05±4.10)° in the posterolateral group, showing no significant difference (t=0.05, P=0.96). The ratio in the target safe zone of the acetabular abduction angle in the anterior group and the posterolateral group were 88.2% (45/51) and 84.3% (43/51) respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.33, P=0.56). The ratio in the target safe zone of the acetabular anteversion was 80.4% (41/51) in the anterior group and was 82.4% (42/51) in the posterolateral group, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.06, P=0.79). The ratio in the target safe zone of both the abduction and anteversion angel was 70.6% (36/51) in the anterior group and was 68.6% (35/51) in the posterolateral group, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.05, P=0.82). Conclusion There is no differences in the acetabulum position during THA between by direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively compare the mid-term effectiveness between by direct anterior approach (DAA) and by posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsBetween January 2009 and December 2010, 110 patients (110 hips) treated with THA and followed up more than 5 years were chosen in the study. THA was performed on 55 patients by DAA (DAA group), and on 55 patients by posterolateral approach (PL group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, types of hip joint disease, and preoperative Harris score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, amount of bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and the Harris scores were recorded and compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time and length of hospital stay between 2 groups (t=0.145, P=0.876; t=1.305, P=0.093). The amount of bleeding was significantly less in DAA group than in PL group (t=2.314, P=0.032). All patients were followed up 5-7 years (mean, 5.97 years). Complications happened in 5 cases (9.1%) of DAA group and in 3 cases (5.5%) of PL group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between 2 groups (χ2=0.539, P=0.463). There was significant difference in Harris scores at 6 months after operation between 2 groups (t=2.296, P=0.014), but no significant difference was found in Harris score at 1 year and 5 years between 2 groups (t=1.375, P=0.130; t=0.905, P=0.087). Further analysis, at 6 months after operation, the joint function score in DAA group was significantly higher than that in PL group (t=1.087, P=0.034), while there was no significant difference in the pain score and range of motion score between 2 groups (t=1.872, P=0.760; t=1.059, P=0.091).ConclusionTHA by DAA has the advantages of less bleeding and faster recovery. The short-term effectiveness is superior to the THA by traditional posterolateral approach, but there is no obvious advantage in the mid-term effectiveness.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach (DAA) and by posterolateral approach, and to investigate the application value of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Methods The clinical data of 65 patients who underwent one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty by DAA or posterolateral approach between June 2010 and November 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. DAA was used in 34 cases (group A) and posterolateral approach was used in 31 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, etiology, disease duration, preoperative Harris score, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P>0.05) with comparability. The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, hospitalization time, early postoperative complications, Harris score, and VAS score were recorded and compared between 2 groups. The simple Likert scale method was applied to evaluate the patient satisfaction, and the imaging evaluation was used. Results The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and hospitalization time of group A were significantly less than those of group B (P<0.05). The patients were followed up 15-48 months (mean, 25.3 months) in group A and 12-51 months (mean, 27.6 months) in group B. The overall incidence of complications related to surgery in group A (10.29%) was significantly lower than that of group B (19.35%) (χ2=8.769, P=0.023). The acetabular anteversion and abduction angle were in the normal range of 2 groups except 1 hip (1.47%) of group A had a higher acetabular anteversion than normal value. Unstable fixed prosthesis happened in 1 hip of groups A and B respectively, and the remaining femoral calcar had no obvious bone resorption and fixed stably. The Harris score and VAS score at each time point after operation of 2 groups were significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), and the differences between the time points after operation were also significant (P<0.05). The Harris score at 1 and 3 months after operation and the VAS score at 3 days after operation of group A were significantly better than those of group B (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found at last follow-up between 2 groups (P>0.05). According to the simple Likert scale method to analyze patient satisfaction, comprehensive satisfaction of group A (97.1%, 33/34) was significantly higher than that of group B (67.7%, 21/31) (χ2=10.343, P=0.001). Conclusion The application of DAA in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty can significantly relieve the pain, accelerate the recovery of hip joint function, and improve the patient satisfaction. But in clinical application, more attentions should be paid to strictly grasp the indications and prevent the early complications. The long-term effectiveness needs to be further observed.
Objective To compare the short-term effectiveness of staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty via different approaches. Methods Thirty-two patients (64 hips) with bilateral hip disease were treated with total hip arthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2014. There were 20 males and 12 females with the mean age of 45.3 years (range, 30-67 years). There were avascular necrosis of femoral head in 14 cases, developmental dislocation of the hip in 12 cases, ankylosing spondylitis in 4 cases, osteoarthritis in 2 cases. All patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty; and the direct anterior approach (DAA) or direct lateral approach (DLA) was chosen for the unilateral hip randomly. The length of incision, operation time, total blood loss volume, the time of first postoperative activity, and the acetabular anteversion angle were compared. The Harris score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and incidence of complication were compared between 2 groups. Results All incisions healed at stage Ⅰ. All patients were followed up 20-53 months (mean, 39.6 months). The length of incision, total blood loss volume, the time of first postoperative activity were significantly shorter in DAA group than in DLA group (P<0.05). The operation time was significantly longer in DAA group than in DLA group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in acetabular anteversion angle between 2 groups (t=1.122, P=0.266). The incidence of complication were 25.00% and 15.63% in DAA group and DLA group, respectively, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.869, P=0.536). The Harris score in DAA group significantly increased at 3 and 9 months after operation than in DLA group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference at 18 months after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The VAS score was significantly lower in DAA group than in DLA group at 1 day, 3 days, and 1 week after operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference at 4 and 8 weeks between 2 groups (P>0.05). The prosthesis did not loosen and sink during the follow-up. Conclusion Total hip arthroplasty via DAA can reduce operation related complication and speed up the recovery of hip function at the early stage after operation. However, the lateral cutaneous nerve injury is the most common complication.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach for hip diseases.MethodsA retrospective study was performed on 23 cases with hip diseases (23 hips), who were treated with the arthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach, between January 2015 and December 2016. There were 9 males and 14 females, aged from 27 to 49 years (mean, 38.6 years). There were 11 cases of posterior dislocation of the hip associated with femoral head fracture (Pipkin typeⅠ) and 7 cases of femoral neck fracture (Garden type Ⅳ). And the interval between injury and operation was 2-8 days (mean, 4.3 days). Five cases were osteonecrosis of femoral head at precollapse stage which were rated as stageⅡA according to Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification system. The disease duration was 3-8 months (mean, 5.9 months). The preoperative Harris hip score, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Postel score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were 57.3±8.2, 11.2±3.6, 3.2±1.5, and 7.2±1.3, respectively.ResultsAll the wounds healed primarily. Lateral femoral nerve injury occurred in 3 cases. All patients were followed up 8-19 months (mean, 15.6 months). Bone union achieved in all patients after 14-19 weeks (mean, 15.8 weeks) and no secondary osteoarthritis or heterotopic ossification occurred. At last follow-up, the Harris hip score (92.5±5.3), OHS (36.5±5.9), and Postel score (14.2±2.6) were significantly higher than preoperative scores (t=45.274, P=0.000; t=36.586, P=0.000; t=32.486, P=0.000), and VAS score (1.8±0.9) was significantly lower than preoperative score (t=21.314, P=0.000).ConclusionArthroscopic surgery combined with direct anterior approach for hip diseases can effectively relieve pain, improve hip function, and obtain the satisfactory short-term effectiveness.