Objective To compare the efficacy and incidence of complications between laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy on women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Methods We did a systematic literature search for studies from Ovid Database, MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), Chinese Biological Medicine Database, CNKI, Chinese VIP Database, and WANFANG Database on internet. The search time was from establishment of each database to December, 2008. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials were collected. The search was no limitation in language. We manually searched current and conference abstracts, and searched relevant reviews and their reference. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Five non-randomized trials involving 417 patients were included. The results of meta-analyse showed that the short-term pregnancy rate in patients underwent laparoscopic surgery was significantly higher than that in patients underwent laparotomy (RR=1.42, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.80, P=0.003). The long-term pregnancy rate in patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy was comparable (RR=0.85, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.07, P=0.17). The regular menstruation in patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy was comparable (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.05, P=0.18). The uterine adhesions in patients underwent laparoscopic surgery was significantly lower than that in patients underwent laparotomy (RR=0.02, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.18, P=0.000 2). The intra-abdominal adhesions of patients underwent laparoscopic surgery was significantly lower than that in patients underwent laparotomy (RR=0.02, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.13, Plt;0.000 1).Conclusions The limited evidence at present shows that the incidence and degree of pelvic adhesions occurred in patients with PCOS after laparoscopic surgery is much lower than those after laparotomy. It is not quite sure at this point about whether the pregnancy rate and regular menstruation of laparoscopic surgery are better than those of lararotomy or not. More evidence from high qualified multi-center studies is needed.
【摘要】 目的 比较腹腔镜和开腹子宫肌瘤切除术在术后第1周的临床效果。 方法 将2008年1月-2009年12月收治的34例子宫肌瘤患者随机分为腹腔镜组17例，开腹组17例。所有患者均为肌壁间肌瘤或浆膜下肌瘤，肌瘤直径在5~15 cm之间且数目≤3个。 结果 两组患者手术时间相近；腹腔镜组术后体温恢复正常时间、肛门排气时间、排尿时间均短于开腹组（Plt;0.05）；腹腔镜组、开腹组术后血红蛋白下降更为明显（Plt;0.05）；术后7 d，开腹组腹痛视觉模拟评分明显高于腹腔镜组（Plt;0.05）。 结论 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术具有创伤小、恢复快、疼痛轻等优点,是一种安全有效的手术方法。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the outcome of myomectomy performed by laparotomy and laparoscopy in the first 7 days after surgery. Methods Thirty-four patients with myoma less than three and in diameter of 5-15 cm from January 2008 to December 2009 were randomly divided into laparotomy group and laparoscopy group. Results Operation lengths were similar in the two groups. Time of paralytic ileus (Plt;0.05) and discharge (Plt;0.05) were longer in laparotomy group than laparoscopy group. Compared with laparoscopy group, laparotomy group had a greater hemoglobin decline (Plt;0.05). Time of post-operation fever were longer in laparotomy group than laparoscopy group (Plt;0.05). Seven days after surgery, the visual analogue scores of abdominal pain were higher in laparotomy group than in laparoscopy group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Compared with the laparotomy myomectomy, laparoscopy myomectomy have mini trauma, quicker post operative recovery, and less pain. This method is safe and effective.
目的了解腹腔镜肝切除术（laparoscopic hepatectomy，LH）与开腹肝切除术（open hepatectomy，OH）治疗原发性肝癌的围手术期状况的变化。 方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2013年6月期间青岛大学医学院附属医院肝胆外科收治的40例原发性肝癌患者的临床资料，其中20例行LH，20例行OH，比较2组患者的术前一般情况、术中情况和术后恢复情况。 结果2组患者术前一般情况的差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；在切口长度、术中出血量、术后肝功能指标、胃肠功能恢复情况和术后住院时间方面LH具有明显的优势（P＜0.05），而在手术时间、术后并发症和住院总费用方面2组间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论LH较传统的OH可明显改善肝癌患者的围手术期状况，值得在有条件的情况下开展推广。