ObjectiveTo design and produce a lesser trochanteric reduction fixation system and verify its value and effectiveness. MethodsA lesser trochanteric reduction fixation system was designed and produced according to the anatomical features of the lesser trochanteric fractures. Sixty-six patients with intertrochanteric fractures of Evans type Ⅲ were included between January 2010 and July 2012. Of 66 patients, 32 were treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) assisted with the lesser trochanteric reduction fixation system (study group), and 34 cases were treated with DHS only (control group). The 2 groups were comparable with no significant difference in gender, age, the reasons, and the types of the fractures (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, neck-shaft angle, bone healing time, ratio of successful fixations, and the functional evaluation of the hip joint after operation were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThe study group had shorter operation time [(58.4±5.3) minutes] and less intraoperative blood loss [(186.3±6.6) mL] than the control group[(78.5±6.2)minutes and (246.2±8.7) mL], showing significant differences (t=-14.040, P=0.000; t=-31.145, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in neck-shaft angle between study group [(138.6±3.0)°] and control group [(139.4±2.9)°] (t=-1.044, P=0.301). The wounds healed by first intention in both groups. The 30 and 31 patients were followed up 12 to 24 months (mean, 15 months) in the study group, and 13 to 25 months (mean, 16 months) in the control group, respectively. All fractures healed well in 2 groups. The study group had significantly shorter healing time [(8.8±2.0) weeks] than the control group [(10.7±3.4) weeks] (t=-2.871, P=0.006). At 12 months after operation, coxa vara happened in 2 cases of the study group with a successful fixation ratio of 93.3% and in 10 cases of the control group with a successful fixation ratio of 67.7%, showing significant difference (χ2=6.319, P=0.022). According to Harris hip score, the excellent and good rate was 83.3% in the study group (25/30) and was 58.1% in the control group (18/31), showing significant difference (χ2=4.680, P=0.049). ConclusionThe application of the lesser trochanteric reduction fixation system can reduce stripping of the soft tissue around the fracture fragments, shorten the operation time and the healing time, and preserve the function of the hip joint maximumly.
目的 比较股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（PFNA）与动力髋螺钉（DHS）两种方法内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。 方法 2007年1月－2011年1月分别采用PFNA、DHS治疗高龄股骨间粗隆骨折（EvansⅠ～Ⅳ型）共68例，其中PFNA组36例，平均年龄81.5岁；DHS组32例，平均年龄82.3岁。两组患者在年龄、性别、骨折分型、合并症以及受伤至手术时间方面比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），有可比性。 结果 术后68例患者均获随访，随访时间6～26个月。与DHS组比较，PFNA组手术时间短、术中出血少，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；PFNA组骨性愈合时间短，但两组差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后DHS组出现1例髋内翻、1例拉力螺钉切出股骨头颈，PFNA组出现1例主钉退钉，两组术后并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。术后1年PFNA组髋关节Harris评分显著高于DHS组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。 结论 PFNA与DHS两种固定方法的骨性愈合时间短、术后并发症少、髋关节功能恢复好，是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的良好方式，尤其是PFNA能减少手术时间和术中出血量，手术创伤小，对高龄且不能耐受较大手术者可作为一种首选术式。
Objective To study the effectiveness of anterolateral C-shaped approach in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur in elderly patient by comparing with traditional anterolateral approach. Methods Between April 2010 and November 2011, 66 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of the femur were analyzed retrospectively. Of 66 patients, 37 underwent improved anterolateral C-shaped approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (DHS) (improved group), and 29 underwent traditional anterolateral approach combined with fixation of DHS (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, side, disease duration, fracture type, and complication between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and hospitalization time were recorded; and X-ray films were taken to observe the fracture healing. The hip function was evaluated according to self-established criterion. Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients, and primary healing of incision was achieved. All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17.8 months). Bone union was achieved in both groups; the fracture healing time was 3-6 months (mean, 4.8 months). No loosening or breaking of internal fixation was observed during follow-up period. The operation time and postoperative drainage volume of improved group were significantly less than those of conventional group (P lt; 0.05); no significant difference was found in intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization days between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). According to self-established criterion, improved group was significantly better than conventional group in recovery of hip joint motion and function at 6 and 12 months after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Anterolateral C-shaped approach combined with DHS could minimize muscle injury and scar formation, which is beneficial to surgical exposure and early postoperative rehabilitation.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between May 2007 and May 2010, 63 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were treated, and fractures were fixed with PFNA in 31 patients (PFNA group) and with DHS in 32 patients (DHS group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, and fracture type between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention. The incision length, operation time, and blood loss in PFNA group were significantly less than those in DHS group (P lt; 0.05). The averagefollow-up time was 13.6 months in PFNA group and was 13.8 months in DHS group. The fracture heal ing time was (11.80 ± 1.32) weeks in PFNA group and was (12.21 ± 1.26) weeks in DHS group, showing no significant difference (t=1.23, P=0.29). The complication rate was 0 in PFNA group and was 12.5% (4/32) in DHS group, showing no significant difference (P=0.06). After 1 year, Harris hip score of PFNA group (86.55 ± 10.32) was higher than that of DHS group (80.36 ±11.18) (t=2.28, P=0.03). Conclusion There are two surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patient: PFNA and DHS, and each has advantages; for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, PFNA treatment is the first choice.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between improved anterolateral approach and lateral approach in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, from 61 patients with senile intertrochanteric fracture treated between February 2008 and February 2010. Of 61 patients, 34 patients underwent improved anterolateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (improved group), and 27 patients underwent conventional lateral approach combined with fixation of dynamic hip screw (conventional group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, Evans classification, comorbidities, disease duration, or Harris hip scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time, blood loss, perspective frequency during operation, drainage volume, hospitalization days, and out-of-bed time in the improved group were significantly less than those in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18.7 months). Bone union was achieved in both groups; the fracture healing time was (11.64 ± 1.28) weeks in the improved group and was (12.29 ± 1.12) weeks in the conventional group, showing no significant difference (t=2.15, P=0.15). Harris hip scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better than preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), and significant differences were found among different time points after operation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), between 2 groups after operation (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of incision infection, limb shortening, coax vara, internal fixation loosening, main screw cutting-out from femoral head between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05), but the incidence of total complications in the improved group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional lateral approach, improved anterolateral approach has the advantages of sufficient exposure, reducing muscle damage and surgical risk in treating intertrochanteric fracture. Operating treatment of improved anterolateral approach combined with early rehabilitation after surgery can recover hip joint function as quickly as possible.
Objective To compare the curative effect of dynamic hi p screw (DHS) combined with anti-rotation screw and cannulated screw in treating patients with Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture and to provide the basis for the choice of surgical procedure. Methods Between March 2008 and September 2009, 51 patients with fresh Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture were treated with DHS combined with anti-rotation screw (DHS group) and three cannulated screws (cannulated screw group). The DHS group included 23 patients, 13 males and 10 females, aging 27-59 years (mean, 43.2 years); fracture was caused by fall ing in 1 case, by traffic accident in 17, by fall ing from height in 5 with a mean time of 27 hoursfrom injury to hospital ization (range, 12-70 hours); and 23 fractures included 9 Pauwels type II and 14 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. The cannulated screw group included 28 patients, 12 males and 16 females, aging 20-60 years (mean, 40.7 years); fracture was caused by fall ing in 1 case, by traffic accident in 22, by fall ing from height in 5 with a mean time of 25 hours from injury to hospital ization (range, 9-38 hours); and 28 fractures included 12 Pauwels type II and 16 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. There was no significant difference in the basel ine characteristics between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The incision heal ing of both groups by first intention was achieved. There were significant differences in operation time, incision size, operation blood loss, the cases of blood transfusion, the amount of blood transfusion, C reaction protein level on the 2nd postoperative day, and hospital ization days between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). In DHS group, anatomic reduction was observed in 20 cases (86.96%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (13.04%), while in cannulated screw group, anatomic reduction was observed in 25 cases (89.29%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (10.71%) ; there was no significant difference (χ2=0.660, P=1.000). The patients were followed up 12-30 months with an average of 14.8 months. There was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) in the rate of nonunion (10.71% vs. 0), the implant failure (3.57% vs. 0), and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (10.71% vs. 0) between the DHS group and the cannulated screw group. The union time was (94.5 ± 2.0) days in the DHS group and (106.0 ± 33.5) days in the cannulated screw group, showing no significant difference (t=—1.641, P=0.107). The re-opereation rates and the overall success rates were 25% and 75% in the cannulated group and were 0 and 100% in the DHS group, showing significant differences (χ2=6.650, P=0.012). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and visualanalogue scale (VAS) score between DHS group and cannulated screw group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The optimal treatment of young adults Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture is DHS combined with anti-rotation screw with an high overall success and less compl ications.
Objective To investigate the appl ication of anti-rotation screw after dynamic hi p screw (DHS) in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Methods Between April 2006 and January 2010, 22 cases of intertrochanteric fractures underwent DHS fixation operation with an anti-rotation screw, including 15 males and 7 females with an average ageof 66.3 years (range, 54-83 years). Fractures were caused by sl ipping in 16 cases, traffic accident in 5 cases, and fall ing from height in 1 case. All cases showed closed fractures, including 13 cases in the left and 9 cases in the right. Eighteen cases were simple intertrochanteric fracture, 4 cases were intertrochanteric fractures compl icated with Colles fractures. According to Evans classification standard, there were 14 cases of type I, 6 cases of type II, 1 case of type III, and 1 case of type IV. The time from wound to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.5 days). Results The operation time ranged from 51-95 minutes (mean, 72 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 150-350 mL (mean, 270 mL). The hospital ization days were 12-35 days (mean, 16.8 days). Primary heal ing was observed in all cases. All cases were followed up 6-17 months (mean, 14 months). Union of fracture was observed at 12-16 weeks (mean, 13.6 weeks); no fracture or internal fixation loosening occurred. According to HUANG Gongyi’s standard of efficacy assessment, the results were excellent in 19 cases and good in 3 cases. Conclusion Appl ication of an anti-rotation screw can help to improve the strength of the DHS for the internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture, especially the anti-rotation abil ity, which does not increase the operation time obviously.