west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "单孔胸腔镜" 33 results
  • Diagnosis and treatment of 131 adult patients with bronchopulmonary sequestration: A retrospective analysis

    ObjectiveTo explore the safety and feasibility of uni-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS). MethodsThe clinical data of BPS patients with surgical resection in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from February 2010 to June 2021 were reviewed. The patients were divided into a VATS group and a thoracotomy group according to the operation method. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay and postoperative complication rate were compared between the two groups. The VATS group was subdivided into a uni-portal VATS group and a multi-portal VATS group for subgroup analysis. ResultsFinally 131 patients were enrolled, including 62 males and 69 females with an average age of 39.3±13.2 years. There were 103 patients in the VATS group and 28 patients in the thoracotomy group. A total of 104 patients were diagnosed with left lower BPS, 26 with right lower BPS and 1 with bilateral lower BPS. The main symptom was cough (88 patients, 67.2%). There were 119 patients diagnosed by thoracic enhanced CT before operation. Compared with the thoracotomy group, the operation time was not statistically different (P=0.717), but the blood loss was less, the rate of postoperative complication was lower and hospital stay was shorter in the VATS group (P<0.05). The rate of conversion to open surgery in the uni-portal VATS group and multi-portal VATS group was 11.8% and 13.5%, respectively. Meanwhile, patients in the uni-portal VATS group had shorter operation time and postoperative hospital stay, less blood loss and lower postoperative complication rate than those in the multi-portal VATS group (P<0.05). Conclusion In order to improve the rate of diagnosis, the lung enhanced CT scan should be selected as an optimal noninvasive method in adult suspected patients (especially those with solid cystic and solid lesions in the lower lobe). Uni-portal VATS is a safe and feasible method for BPS which can be widely promoted.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Single-incision Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery versus Conventional Three-port Surgery for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional three-port VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to Dec. 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing single-incision VATS and conventional three-port VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 8 cohort studies involving 483 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:Compared with conventional three-port VATS, single-incision VATS had shorter operation time (MD=-3.90, 95%CI -7.22 to -0.58, P=0.02), less amount of intraoperative bleeding (MD=-9.34, 95%CI -15.26 to -3.42, P=0.002), shorter chest drainage time (MD=-0.66, 95%CI -1.02 to -0.29, P=0.000 4), lower VAS score of 24h-postoperative pain (MD=-0.90, 95%CI -1.14 to -0.66, P<0.000 01) and lower incidence of postoperative paresthesia (OR=0.15, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.31, P<0.000 01). Meanwhile, there were no statistical differences between both groups in hospital stay (MD=-0.30, 95%CI -0.63 to 0.03, P=0.08) and the recurrence of pneumothorax (OR=0.68, 95%CI 0.25 to 1.83, P=0.53). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, single-incision VATS is superior to conventional three-port VATS in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. However, due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without chest tube in enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery

    ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical feasibility and safety of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) without chest tube in enhanced recovery thoracic surgery.MethodThe clinical data of patients with pulmonary bulla, pulmonary nodules and mediastinal tumors who underwent uniportal VATS in Department of Thoracic Surgery in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University between January 2015 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 78 patients did not receive closed thoracic drainage tube (a tube-free group), including 30 males and 48 females aged 32.5±8.3 years, 92 patients closed thoracic drainage tube after operation (a control group), including 38 males and 54 females aged 31.4±13.6 years. The surgery-related indicators, postoperative complications and visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe time of early ambulation and hospital stay after operation in the tube-free group (1.0±0.3 d, 3.3±0.7 d) were significantly shorter than those in the control group (1.8±0.6 d, 5.2±0.8 d) (P=0.000, P=0.000). The VAS pain scores on the first, second and third day after operation in the tube-free group (4.5±1.8, 3.6±2.4, 2.5±1.4) were also significantly lower than those in the control group (6.8±2.2, 5.7±2.9, 3.9±1.2) (P=0.000, P=0.000, P=0.000). Operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the tube-free group (55.3±12.2 min, 21.5±5.1 mL) and the control group (57.1±6.5 min, 22.2±3.5 mL) were not statistically different (P=0.220, P=0.146). There was no pulmonary infection in both groups, and the wound healing rate was 100.0%. There was no significant difference in pneumothorax, pleural effusion, arrhythmia and re-insertion of chest drain between the tube-free group (5 patients, 8 patients, 1 patient, 3 patients) and the control group (1 patient, 4 patients, 2 patients, 1 patient, P=0.145, P=0.134, P=0.885, P=0.499).ConclusionIn strictly screened patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery, no thoracic closed drainage tube can relieve postoperative pain, promote early ambulation activities and enhanced recovery of patients.

    Release date:2019-12-13 03:50 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单孔胸腔镜下常规手术器械替代一次性手术器械对肺癌肺叶切除术的临床分析

    目的探讨单孔胸腔镜下常规手术器械替代一次性手术器械对肺癌肺叶切除术近期临床疗效及治疗费用差异。方法前瞻性纳入 2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 6 月云南省肿瘤医院胸外一科Ⅰa~Ⅲa 期非小细胞肺癌患者 44 例。患者按手术方式不同分为一次性器械组 24 例[A 组,对照组,男 10 例、女 14 例,平均年龄 53.8(30~77)岁]和常规器械替代组 20 例[B 组,试验组,男 9 例、女 11 例,平均年龄 53.6(35~70)岁]。比较两组临床效果。结果两组手术均顺利完成,两组术中出血量、术后引流管引流量、术后胸腔引流管留置时间、术后住院时间、并发症发生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A 组手术时间和住院总费用分别为(57.29±7.52)min 和(52 830.79±6 621.71)元,B 组手术时间和住院总费用分别为(79.00±9.81)min 和(29 565.90±2 734.25)元,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论单孔胸腔镜下常规手术器械替代一次性器械在肺癌肺叶切除术中安全可行,且大大降低了患者住院总费用。

    Release date:2019-07-17 04:28 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单孔胸腔镜治疗单侧气胸合并对侧肺大泡疗效分析Effect of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for unilateral pneumothorax with contralateral pulmonary bullae

    目的 探讨单孔胸腔镜治疗单侧气胸合并对侧肺大泡的安全性、有效性及实用性。 方法 回顾性分析内江市第一人民医院 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 7 月单孔胸腔镜手术治疗 46 例单侧气胸合并对侧肺大泡患者的临床资料,其中男 29 例、女 17 例,年龄 15~34 岁。术前均经高分辨薄层 CT 检查证实为单侧气胸合并对侧肺大泡,同期行双侧手术。 结果 全组患者均顺利完成手术,无严重并发症及死亡病例。术后随访 1~36 个月,共有 3 例患者复发,其中气胸侧 2 例(4.35%),肺大泡侧 1 例(2.17%)。 结论 单孔胸腔镜治疗单侧气胸合并对侧肺大泡创伤小、安全、有效,能显著降低对侧气胸发生率。

    Release date:2017-01-22 10:15 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of single-microport assisted micro-uni-port thoracoscopy surgery in up-lobectomy

    Objective To compare the differences between the up-lobectomy by single-microport assisted micro-uni-port thoracoscopy surgery and traditional uni-portal video assisted thoracic surgery, summarize and analyze the technical points of single-microport assisted micro-uni-port thoracoscopy surgery, and explore the surgical effect and value of promotion. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent radical upper lobectomy at the Thoracic Surgery Department of Xi’an International Medical Center Hospital from March 2023 to June 2024. The patients were divided into two groups according the surgical procedure: a single-micromini-assisted group (patients underwent up-lobectomy by single-microport assisted micro-uni-port thoracoscopy) and a traditional uniportal group (patients underwent traditional uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy). Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results We finally included 62 patients. There were 30 patients with 16 males and 14 females at an average of 57.4±10.8 years in the the single-micromini-assisted group and 32 patients with 20 males and 12 females at an average age of 57.6±8.7 years in the traditional uni-port thoracoscopy group. Both groups successfully completed minimally invasive surgery.The baseline data were consistent between the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the single microport assisted group [(146.03±30.79) min vs. (171.41±36.41) min, P=0.004] than that in the traditional uni-port thoracoscopy group with a statistical difference. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain score, dissected lymph node number, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative tube time, postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization cost, or the incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05). Conclusion Single-microport assisted micro-uni-port thoracoscopy surgery can maximize the advantages of three-portal and uni-portal VATS, and effectively avoid the disadvantages of three-portal and uni-portal VATS, which can significantly shorten the operation time, without increasing the postoperative pain and complications, is a more minimally invasive, safer and more convenient surgical method.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Early chest tube removal following single-direction versus conventional uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A retrospective cohort study

    ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of early chest tube removal following single-direction uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (S-UVATS) anatomical lobectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of consecutive VATS lobectomy by different surgeons in Xuzhou Central Hospital between May 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Finally, the data of 1 084 patients were selected for analysis, including 538 males and 546 females, with a mean age of 61.0±10.1 years. These patients were divided into a S-UVATS group with 558 patients and a conventional group (C-UVATS) with 526 patients according to the surgical procedures. The perioperative parameters such as operation time, blood loss were recorded. In addition, we assessed the amount of residual pleural effusion and the probability of secondary thoracentesis when taking 300 mL/d and 450 mL/d as the threshold of chest tube removal. ResultsTumor-negative surgical margin was achieved without mortality in this cohort. As compared with the C-UVATS group, patients in the S- UVATS group demonstrated significantly shorter operation time (P<0.001), less blood loss (P=0.002), lower rate of conversion to multiple-port VATS or thoracotomy (P=0.003), but more stations and numbers of dissected lymph nodes as well as less suture staplers (P<0.001). Moreover, patients in the S-UVATS demonstrated shorter chest tube duration, less total volume of thoracic drainage and shorter postoperative hospital stay, with statistical differences (P<0.001). After excluding patients of chylothorax and prolonged air leaks>7 d, subgroup analysis was performed. First, assuming that 300 mL/d was the threshold for chest tube removal, as compared with the C-UVATS group, patients in the S-UVATS group would report less residual pleural effusion and less necessitating second thoracentesis with residual pleural effusion>500 mL (P<0.05). Second, assuming that 450 mL/d was the threshold for chest tube removal, as compared with the C-UVATS group, the S-UVATS group would also report less residual pleural effusion and less necessitating second thoracentesis with residual pleural effusion>500 mL (P<0.05). Further multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that S-UVATS was significantly negatively related to drainage volume>1 000 mL (P<0.05); whereas combined lobectomy, longer operation time, more blood loss and air leakage were independent risk factors correlated with drainage volume>1 000 mL following UVATS lobectomy (P<0.05). ConclusionThe short-term efficacy of S-UVATS lobectomy is significantly better than that of the conventional group, indicating shorter operation time and less chest drainage. However, early chest tube removal with a high threshold of thoracic drainage volume probably increases the risk of secondary thoracentesis due to residual pleural effusion.

    Release date:2023-02-03 05:31 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 吲哚菁绿荧光胸腔镜技术在单孔胸腔镜下肺段切除术段间平面的识别

    Release date:2019-05-28 09:28 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 单孔胸腔镜肺手术的扶镜体会与思考

    Release date:2018-11-27 04:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Learning Curve of Single Pore Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Pulmonary Bullae

    ObjectiveTo explore the learning curve of single pore video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of pulmonary bullae. MethodsFrom July 2010 to October 2011, sixty consecutive patients with pulmo-nary bulla undergoing single pore VATS by the same group of surgeons in the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Songgang People's Hospital. According to the sequence of the operations, all the patients were divided into group A, B, and C with 20 patients in each group. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and thoracic drainage duration were compared between the 3 groups to evaluate surgical outcomes in different stages. Operation time and postoperative hospital stay were the main indexes of the learning curve. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in age, gender or incidence of pneumothorax between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). Operation time of group A (42.7±9.4 minutes) was significantly longer than those of group B (21.3±6.7 minutes) and group C (20.8±7.5 minutes) (P < 0.01). Postoperative hospital stay of group A (10.6±2.2 days) was significantly longer than those of group B (7.6±1.2 days) and group C (7.4±1.2 days) (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in other indexes among the 3 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe learning curve of single pore VATS for the treatment of pulmonary bullae is approximately 20 cases.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
4 pages Previous 1 2 3 4 Next

Format

Content