ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for varicocele. MethodsSuch databases as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, and WanFang Data were electronically searched for studies about LESS and traditional laparoscopy for varicocele till March 1st, 2013. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature was screened, data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included studies was also assessed. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsSeven RCTs involving 452 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, there was no significant difference between LESS and traditional laparoscopy for varicocele on post-operational complications (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.26 to 1.27, P=0.17), duration of hospital stay (MD=-0.30, 95%CI-0.87 to 0.26, P=0.30), improvement of semen parameters, and blood loss. However, LESS had longer duration of operation (MD=11.26, 95%CI 3.62 to 18.90, P=0.004). ConclusionThe effectiveness and safety of LESS and traditional laparoscopy for varicocele are similar, and LESS could achieve more beautiful and natural effects which has longer surgery time on account of non-proficiency in surgery and equipment. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion requires to be proved by more high quality randomized controlled trials.
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILSG) was first described in 2008, which could effectively control excess body weight and treat metabolic diseases relevant to obesity in a long term. Over more than a decade of refinement and technical advancement, precise and standardized surgical techniques have become critical for ensuring treatment efficacy and reducing the rate of postoperative complications. Thus, this review summarizes the evolution of SILSG, further understanding and emphasizing the importance of standardized and precise surgical procedures.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in treatment of colorectal cancer.MethodsThe Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data were searched to collect the comparative study of the SILS and CLS in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The data were extracted and evaluated by the RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsEventually, 13 articles were included, including 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 case-control studies with a total of 1 466 patients. The meta-analysis results suggested that the SILS could shorten the postoperative hospital stay [MD=–0.63, 95% CI (–1.10, –0.16), P=0.009] and time to the first flatus [MD=–0.23, 95% CI (–0.33, –0.13), P<0.000 01] and the lymph node dissection was relatively completed [MD=0.77, 95% CI (0.05, 1.48), P=0.04] as compared with the CLS. In the total complications of surgery [OR=0.73, 95% CI (0.51, 1.03), P=0.08], operation time [MD=–0.33, 95% CI (–11.36, 10.69), P=0.95], intraoperative blood loss [MD=5.61, 95% CI (–4.20, 15.43), P=0.26], conversion to laparotomy [OR=1.06, 95% CI (0.18, 6.13), P=0.95], distance between tumor and proximal margin [MD=0.11, 95% CI (–0.48, 0.69), P=0.71], distance between tumor and distal margin [MD=0.32, 95% CI (–0.23, 0.87), P=0.25] had no statistically significant differences between the SILS and CLS.ConclusionsSILS is safe and effective for radical resection of colorectal cancer. However, results of study still need to be validated by a randomized controlled trial with a large sample designed strictly.
ObjectiveTo analyze safety and feasibility of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting. MethodsThe clinical data of 36 patients who diagnosed as hydrocephalus underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting from May 2013 to August 2015 in this hospital were collected. Twelve patients were performed transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting (laparoscopy group) and 24 patients were performed laparotomy ventriculoperitoneal shunting (laparotomy group). The abdominal operation time, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score, and postoperative complications rate were compared between the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group. ResultsAll the operations were completed successfully. Compared with the laparotomy group, the abdominal operation time (P < 0.05), postoperative exhaust time (P < 0.05), and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05) were significantly shorter, the postoperative pain score was significantly less (P < 0.05) in the laparoscopy group. The postoperative complications rate had no significant difference between the laparoscopy group and the laparotomy group (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting is safe and feasible, with better cosmetic. more comparative studies or randomized controlled trials are required to make a confirmed conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of myomectomy via transumbilical laparoendompic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) and traditional multiport laparoscopy.MethodsThe study was conducted at Chengdu Western Hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Fifty patients underwent TU-LESS myomectomy (TU-LESS group), while another 50 patients underwent traditional multiport laparoscopic myomectmy (multiport laparoscopy group). The conditions of operation, extra analgetic usage, VAS grade, and patients’ satisfaction degree were compared between two groups.ResultsPatients in both groups had similar age, BMI, fibroma volume, operative time, expelling gas day, blood loss, complication rate, and hospitalized costs (P>0.05). Compared with traditional multiport laparoscopy, the TU-LESS group resulted in significantly shorter hospitalization day, lower VAS score of the 1st/3nd/7th days after surgery, less use of analgetic after surgery, and higher satisfaction degree.ConclusionsTU-LESS is safe and feasible for myomectomy, and it is associated with less pain, shorter hospitalization day, and higher satisfaction degree.
Objective To summarize the experience of single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to discuss the operative techniques. Methods The clinical data of 21 cases who underwent single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Shengjing Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2011 were collected and analyzed. Results Of 21 cases underwent single incision laparoscopic surgery， right hemicolectomy performed in 5 cases， sigmoidectomy performed in 2 cases， rectal anterior resection performed in 9 cases， rectal abdominoperineal resection performed in 2 cases， total colectomy performed in 1 case， and colostomy performed in 2 cases. Twenty cases completed by single incision， but 1 case was added an extra 12 mm incision in order to dissect the lower segment of rectum. The operative time was （189±75） min （40-335min）；the postoperative hospitalization time was （11.5±3.4） d （7-16d）. There were no bleeding， anastomosis leakage or intestinal obstruction after operation， and no incision infection， rupture or hernia were founded. No recurrence was found within 6 months’ follow up after operation. Conclusions Under reasonable selection of indication， single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible， and it also has a satisfactory cosmetic effect and better minimally invasive effect.