Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). Methods We electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SILC versus CMLC from inception to January 1st, 2013. According to the Cochrane methods, the reviewers screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Finally, 17 RCTs involving 1 233 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with CMLC, SILC was lower in 24 h postoperative pain score (visual analogue scale, VAS) (SMD= –0.40, 95%CI –0.76 to –0.04, P=0.03), higher in cosmetic results score (SMD=1.56, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.43, P=0.000 4), and longer in operative time (MD=13.11, 95%CI 7.06 to 19.16, Plt;0.000 1). However, no significant difference was found in 6 h postoperative pain scores (VAS), postoperative complications, port-site hernia and hospital stay between the two groups. Conclusion SILC is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of uncomplicated benign gallbladder diseases, and it has certain advantages compared with CMLC, which is recommended in clinical application.
【摘要】 目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床可行性及其优缺点。 方法 回顾分析2010年7-9月行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术34例患者临床资料。 结果 患者均顺利完成单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术，手术平均时间为65 min，术后平均住院时间为3 d，术后未发生出血、感染、胆瘘等并发症。 结论 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的，术后腹部无明显瘢痕，美容效果明显。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the feasibility and value of the trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods The clinical data of 34 patients who underwent trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy from July to September 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The operations of 34 patients were successfully performed. The mean operative duration was 65 minutes, and the mean duration in hospital after the operation was 3 days. No infection, postoperative bleeding, and biliary leakage occurred postoperatively. Conclusion Trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible with good cosmetic effect.
Objective To summarize the experience of single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to discuss the operative techniques. Methods The clinical data of 21 cases who underwent single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Shengjing Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2011 were collected and analyzed. Results Of 21 cases underwent single incision laparoscopic surgery， right hemicolectomy performed in 5 cases， sigmoidectomy performed in 2 cases， rectal anterior resection performed in 9 cases， rectal abdominoperineal resection performed in 2 cases， total colectomy performed in 1 case， and colostomy performed in 2 cases. Twenty cases completed by single incision， but 1 case was added an extra 12 mm incision in order to dissect the lower segment of rectum. The operative time was （189±75） min （40-335min）；the postoperative hospitalization time was （11.5±3.4） d （7-16d）. There were no bleeding， anastomosis leakage or intestinal obstruction after operation， and no incision infection， rupture or hernia were founded. No recurrence was found within 6 months’ follow up after operation. Conclusions Under reasonable selection of indication， single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible， and it also has a satisfactory cosmetic effect and better minimally invasive effect.
ObjectiveTo compare the advantages and disadvantages of transumbilical single port (TUSP) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsThe clinical data of 45 patients underwent elective LC were analyzed, 20 patients with TUSP LC (TUSP-LC group), 25 patients with conventional LC (conventional LC group). The operation time, Child-Pugh score and painkiller application frequency within three days after operation, the first time of out of bed and hospital stay after operation, intraoperative blood loss, chronic pain within one month after surgery were compared between two groups. ResultsAll cases were operated successfully except one patient in the conventional LC group. The frequency of painkiller application within three days after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the TUSP-LC group were better than those in the conventional LC group (Plt;0.05). There were no significant differences on postoperative chronic pain of surgical area within 1 month and Child-Pugh score between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the conventional LC group were less than those in the TUSP-LC group (Plt;0.05, Plt;0.01). ConclusionTUSP LC has the advantages of small wound, slight pain, and fast recovery.
目的 探讨利用常规腹腔镜器械完成经脐单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的可能性和技术要点。方法 收集中国医科大学附属盛京医院微创外科于2009年4月至2010年1月期间施行的12例经脐单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的临床资料。阑尾炎8例，均为女性，平均年龄40岁； 回盲部肿物2例，均为女性，其中1例为回盲部淋巴水瘤（68岁），另1例为回盲部溃疡性结肠炎（47岁）； 乙状结肠息肉1例，女，55岁； 直肠癌1例，男，52岁。 12例均于脐部行2.5~3.0 cm长单切口，利用常规腹腔镜手术器械完成手术。结果 8例阑尾手术，手术时间20~50 min，出血量均少于10 ml； 2例回盲部切除术手术时间分别为60 min和90 min，出血量分别为10 ml和20 ml； 1例乙状结肠切除术用时120 min，术中出血约50 ml，术后4 d拔除引流管； 直肠癌手术时间210 min，术中出血少于200 ml，术后1周拔除引流管并出院。结论 利用常规腹腔镜手术器械完成经脐单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术安全可行。
目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）的临床应用。方法分析我院2009年1月至2010年5月期间120例因结石性胆囊炎和胆囊息肉行经脐单孔LC患者的临床资料。结果98例患者手术成功，手术时间38～126 min，平均50.3 min。22例单孔手术失败改成两孔完成手术。住院时间2～4 d，平均2.5 d。全组患者无出血及漏胆并发症发生，仅2例（1.7%）脐部戳孔处术后轻度感染，经局部换药治疗2周愈合。89例（90.8%）采用单孔法患者获得1～15个月（平均7.3个月）随访，均无并发症发生。结论单孔LC安全可行，但使用现有腹腔镜设备操作难度较大，器械及技术尚需进一步完善。
Abstract： Currently, there are two significant tendencies in the advancement and progress of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery（VATS）, firstly, the widening surgical indications for VATS techniques, and secondly, the use of single-port VATS which is less invasive and more cosmetic. This article focuses in particular on four aspects of single-port VATS, including；（1）the individualized incision approach and its characteristics of single-port VATS；（2）single-port VATS for the treatment of pneumothorax and the development of related techniques and equipment；（3）single-port VATS for the diagnosis and treatment of thoracic diseases such as lung lobectomy；（4）the advantages and disadvantages of single-port VATS in clinical practice.
目的 探讨改良的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床可行性。 方法 回顾性分析2009年2月－2012年4月75例患者行改良经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的临床资料。其中39例胆囊结石，20例胆囊息肉，急性胆囊炎14例，急性胆囊炎伴穿孔2例。 结果 73例手术均成功完成，2例转为传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后顺利完成手术，无中转开腹。平均手术时间为54.4 min （23～120 min）。术中出血量5～30 mL，平均(14.9 ± 5.10) mL。术后疼痛轻，恢复快，3 d后出院。随访1～10个月，未出现出血、漏胆、胆管损伤、消化道损伤、切口疝等并发症。且瘢痕隐蔽，不易发现。 结论 改良后的经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全可行，具有微创、经济、恢复快等优点，具有推广价值。
目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除的可行性、安全性及实用性。 方法 回顾分析2010年11月－2011年2月27例行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的临床资料。其中男15例，女12例；年龄19～53岁，平均39.5岁。胆囊息肉样病变12例，病程6个月～8年；胆囊结石17例，结石数量1～9个，大小0.5～1.5 cm，均为非急性期患者，病程1个月～13年。 结果 27例手术均顺利完成，无1例中转开腹或转为传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术，术中生命体征平稳。手术时间35～149 min，平均63 min；术中出血10～20 mL，平均15 mL。所有患者术后2～3 d出院。患者均获随访，随访时间6～24个月，平均13个月。术中及术后随访期间未发生任何并发症。脐部瘢痕不明显，患者满意度高。 结论 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除安全可行，具有创伤小、瘢痕不明显等优点。
目的 探讨应用传统器械经脐行改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床价值。方法 回顾性分析笔者所在医院2010年1月至2012年2月期间行经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的52例阑尾炎患者的临床资料，总结手术经验。结果 52例患者均顺利完成手术，平均手术时间为39.2min （18～70min），术后平均住院时间为5d （3～12d）。其中，45例患者成功完成经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术，2例中转开腹，2例行两孔LA术，3例行三孔LA术。术后2例患者发生切口感染。29例患者获访，随访时间4～18个月，平均12个月，无出血、切口疝、腹腔残余感染、粘连性肠梗阻、阑尾残端瘘等并发症发生。结论 应用传统器械经脐行改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术简单、安全、可行、患者恢复快、并发症少、美容效果较好，但操作难度相对更高。应严格掌握手术适应证，必要时及时增加戳孔或中转开腹。