目的:了解成都市3~6岁学龄前儿童超重、单纯性肥胖发展趋势和干预效果,以寻求更有效的干预措施。方法:自2000~2007年对成都市五城区所有一类托幼园所3~6岁儿童进行调查,对其超重、肥胖发生、发展动态趋势进行分析研究,并设重点干预点进行连续干预监测。参照WHO标准,应用身高别体重法评价儿童超重和肥胖。结果:2000~2005年中,成都市学龄前儿童超重、单纯性肥胖发生率显著升高(2000年为6.50%、2.14%;2005年为9.57%,4.39%,Plt;0.001);通过对托幼园所实施肥胖干预后,2005~2007年儿童超重、单纯性肥胖检出率处于稳定控制状态(2007年为9.13%,4.17%,Pgt;0.05)。2005~2007年对本市15所托幼机构实施重点干预后,儿童超重、肥胖检出率为8.51%,3.26%,明显降低(Plt;0.05),而一般干预点,超重、肥胖发生率明显升高(10.42%,5.12%,Plt;0.05)。结论:学龄前儿童超重、单纯性肥胖呈上升趋势,有效的干预措施能控制超重和肥胖发生率。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical effects of green tea extracts on simple obesity. MethodsSystematic retrieval were conducted in PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2012), CNKI, VIP, CBM, and WanFang Data to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on green tea extracts in treating patients with simple obesity. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.0. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 693 patients were included. Results of meta-analysis displayed that compared with the control group, patients in the green tea extracts group significantly had a obvious decrease of body mass (WMD=-0.32, 95%CI-0.46 to-0.17, P < 0.000 1) as well as body mass index (BMI) (WMD=-0.07, 90%CI-0.09 to-0.05, P < 0.000 01) with significant differences. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, green tea extracts could effectively treat simple obesity.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of auricular pressure therapy for simple obesity in adult. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2015), PubMed, Web of Science, MEDⅡNE (Ovid), CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data databases to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of auricular pressure therapy for simple obesity from inception to March 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 17 RCTs involving 1 246 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:(1) Compared with the blank control group, the auricular pressure therapy group was superior in weight reduction (MD=-2.50, 95%CI -3.53 to -1.47, P<0.01), BMI reduction (MD=-1.50, 95%CI -2.52 to -0.48, P=0.004), and waist circumference reduction (MD=-3.20, 95%CI -4.38 to -2.02, P<0.01); (2) Compared with the placebo control group, the auricular pressure therapy group was superior in weight reduction (MD=-1.39, 95%CI -1.46 to -1.31, P<0.01), BMI reduction (MD=-0.65, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.38, P<0.01), body fat percentage reduction (MD=-0.58, 95%CI -0.67 to -0.49, P<0.01), and waist circumference reduction (MD=-2.34, 95%CI -4.23 to -0.46, P=0.01); (3) There were no significant differences between the auricular pressure therapy group and the body acupuncture group in weight reduction, BMI reduction, and waist circumference reduction (all P values >0.05); (4) Compared with the body acupuncture group, the auricular pressure combined with body acupuncture group was superior in BMI reduction (MD=-1.67, 95%CI -2.48 to -0.85, P<0.01); (5) Three RCTs reported adverse reactions including cyanotic skin, erythema near auricular pressure etc., and all adverse reactions were mostly mild and recovered after treatment. ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that auricular pressure therapy for simple obesity is superior to placebo and blank control, but similar to body acupuncture; the auricular pressure combined with body acupuncture is superior to body acupuncture alone in BMI reduction. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in the treatment of obesity with different degrees of obesity.MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients received LSG in this hospital from October 2016 to October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The effect of LSG on postoperative weight loss in patients with different degrees of obesity were analyzed too.Results① A total of 161 patients with simple obesity were included in this study, including 40 cases of degree Ⅰ obesity, 41 cases of degree Ⅱ obesity, 61 cases of degree Ⅲ obesity, and 19 cases of super obesity. All operations were successfully completed, there was no conversion to laparotomy or mortality. The postoperative bleeding occurred in 4 (2.5%) cases, nausea and vomiting occurred in 97 (60.2%) cases during hospitalization, and 143, 130, and 122 cases were followed up in 1-, 2-, and 3-year after operation. The body mass indexes (BMIs) were decreased significantly in postoperative 1-, 2-, and 3-year (P<0.05) as compared with their preoperative values, respectively. The excess BMI loss percentage(EBMIL%) in postoperative 1-, 2-, and 3-year were (87.4±25.7)%, (84.6±30.5)%, and (88.8±20.4)%, respectively. The rates of weight regaining were 3.8% (5/130) and 4.9% (6/122) in 2- and 3-year following-up, respectively. ② There were no remarkable changes in the trend of BMI in patients with degree Ⅰ and Ⅱ obesity [the EBMIL% changes from postoperative year-1 to year-3 were (–2.3±1.1)% and (3.3±1.5)%, respectively]. Conversely, there were remarkable changes in the trend of BMI in patients with degree Ⅲ obesity and super obesity [the EBMIL% changes from postoperative year-1 to year-3 were (–7.1±1.9)% and (–11.6±5.3)%, respectively].ConclusionsFrom the results of this study, LSG has a good effect on weight loss in the treatment of patients withdegree Ⅰ and Ⅱ obesity. The long-term efficacy of LSG in patients with degree Ⅲ and super obesity, whether to take other bariatric procedures, whether to perform the second operation, and the timing of the second operation need to be further explored.