目的:对同侧胫腓骨骨折、髋关节骨折后脱位合并膝后交叉韧带损伤的创伤机制及诊断进行分析探讨。方法:对2007年1月至2008年6月收治的7例同侧胫腓骨骨折、髋关节骨折后脱位合并膝后交叉韧带损伤患者的临床资料、诊治经过和随访结果进行总结分析。结果: 胫腓骨开放性骨折3例(42.9%),闭合性骨折4例(57.1%);髋关节均有后脱位,其中伴有髋部骨折5例(71.4%)。膝后交叉韧带实质部断裂4例(57.1%),胫骨止点撕脱骨折3例(42.9%)。7例患者获平均14.7个月(12～18个月)随访。Lysholm膝关节功能评分术后6月95.8±3.71,术后12月97.6±2.7。结论:明确同侧胫腓骨骨折、髋关节骨折后脱位合并膝后交叉韧带损伤的创伤机制,全面、准确、系统的问诊查体和完善的辅助检查是早期确诊、提高疗效的关键。
OBJECTIVE To probe the clinical results of a new designed operation-double semitendinous reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with invasive mini-plate. METHODS The new surgical technique was performed on 28 patients with PCL deficient knee in our department from September 1994 to October 1997. Protection of popliteal nerves and blood vessels was emphasized in the operation, and the femoral and tibial tunnel placement was critical to the procedure’s success. RESULTS All patients were followed up 18 to 36 months, averaged 22 months, they gained stable knees. The knee function of 28 patients recovered to normal after the operation, 1 patients had a small range of limitation of the knee flexion, but no obvious dysfunction. CONCLUSION Double semitendinous reconstruction of PCL with invasive mini-plate has advantages in the operated field exposure, adequate tibial and femoral fixation and excellent results in motion, stability and function of the knee after the operation.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of open reduction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of knee joint with absorbable screws fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation. Methods The clinical data of 26 patients with PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion who met the selection criteria between March 2015 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 14 patients were fixed with simple absorbable screw (group A), and 12 patients were fixed with absorbable screw combined with suture anchors (group B). All patients were confirmed by X-ray film, CT, or MRI preoperatively, and got positive results in preoperative posterior drawer tests. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side of affected limb, time from injury to operation, comorbidities, and preoperative Meyers & McKeever classification, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. At last follow-up, Lysholm score and IKDC score were used to evaluate the improvement of knee function. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as vascular and nerve injury or venous thrombosis occurred. All 26 patients were followed up 9-89 months, with an average of 55.3 months. The follow-up time of group A and group B was (55.7±23.2) and (56.8±29.3) months, respectively, with no significant difference (t=−0.106, P=0.916). Radiographs showed bone healing in both groups at 3 months after operation, and no complication such as infection and traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the posterior drawer test was negative in both groups, and the Lysholm score and IKDC score significantly improved when compared with the pre-operative values (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement value between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of the knee joint, the open reduction and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation can achieve reliable fracture reduction and fixation, which is conducive to the early rehabilitation and functional exercise, and the postoperative functional recovery of the knee joint is satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo conclude the effectiveness of arthroscopy combined with Burks and SchaVer's approach in the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures in a floppy lateral position. MethodsBetween May 2010 and March 2014, 21 patients with PCL avulsion fractures were treated. There were 13 males and 8 females, aged 21 to 62 years (mean, 39.1 years). The causes included traffic accident injury in 10 cases, sports injury in 5 cases, and falling injury from height in 6 cases. The time from injury to hospital was 1-6 days (mean, 2.5 days). The results of posterior drawer test were all positive, and the results of anterior drawer test and lateral stress test were all negative. The Lysholm score was 28.0±5.5 before operation. And the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (IKDC) score was 46.2±7.6 before operation. According to Meyer standards for fractures classification, 11 cases were rated as type II and 10 cases as type III. Arthroscopy was used to inspect and treat the intra-articular lesions, then avulsion fracture was fixed by Burks and SchaVer's approach in lateral position. Postoperative functional exercises were performed. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained, without nerve and vascular injury or joint infection. All patients were followed up 18-36 months (mean, 27.2 months). The X-ray films of the knee joint showed good fractures reduction and healing at 3 months after operation. The results of posterior drawer test and reverse Lachman test were negative. The knee range of motion was recovered to normal level. At last follow-up, the Lysholm score of the knee joint was significantly improved to 90.9±1.4 from preoperative one (t=54.584, P=0.000), and the IKDC score was significantly increased to 90.5±5.3 from preoperative one (t=15.638, P=0.000), including 19 cases of grade A and 2 cases of grade B. ConclusionA combination of arthroscopy and Burks and SchaVer's approach for the treatment of PCL avulsion fractures in a floppy lateral position has the advantages of minimal invasion and safe approach, short operative time, and early postoperative rehabilitation exercises, so it can provide satisfactory function recovery of the knee joint.
OBJECTIVE To measure the isometric point of the attachment site in femur during the reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). METHODS Seven fresh knee specimens from cadavers were adopted in this experiment. The anterior, posterior, proximal, distal and central points of the PCL’s femoral attachment site were respectively anchored to the middle of the PCL’s tibial attachment site by the trial isometer wires. The length changes of the intra-articular part of the wires were recorded while the knee was flexed from 0 degree to 120 degrees by a continuous passive motion(CPM) machine. RESULTS The maximal length changes in every points were compared. It showed that the length change in anterior point was the biggest, the distal point was less than that of anterior point, and the proximal point was the least. There was significant difference between proximal and posterior points, but no significant difference between proximal and central points, neither between central and posterior points. All of the maximal length changes of proximal, central and posterior points were not greater than 2 mm. CONCLUSION The femoral tunnel for the PCL reconstruction should be located at the proximal point, which is the middle point of upper edge of femoral attachment site. The selected point for femoral tunnel also may be moved slightly in the direction to central or posterior points according to the needs of operation.
ObjectiveTo compare the early effectiveness of minimally invasive open reduction and internal fixation via posterior median approach versus arthroscopic double-tunnel suture fixation in treatment of tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).MethodsA clinical data of 31 patients with the tibial avulsion fracture of the PCL and met the criteria between January 2015 and January 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Nineteen patients (group A) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screw via posterior median approach. The other 12 patients (group B) were treated with arthroscopic double-tunnel suture fixation technique. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in the gender, age, side of effected limb, the injury cause, the time from injury to operation, the combined meniscus injury, Meyers & McKeever classification and preoperative Lysholm score, Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and the difference of tibial posterior displacement between bilateral knees. The operation time, postoperative complications, fracture healing, and the difference of tibial posterior displacement between bilateral knees, Lysholm score, Tegner score, and IKDC score were recorded.ResultsGroup B spent significantly longer operation time than group A (t=7.347, P=0.000). No postoperative complication occurred in group B, and 1 patient in group A had a screw breakage. All patients were followed up 6-36 months (mean, 22 months). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed at 3 months after operation. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the patients with normal knee range of motion between the two groups (P=0.510). At last follow-up, the difference of tibial posterior displacement between bilateral knees, Lysholm score, Tegner score, and IKDC score in the two groups were superior to those before operation (P<0.05); while there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionFor the tibial avulsion fracture of PCL, the minimally invasive open reduction and internal fixation and arthroscopic double-tunnel suture fixation can obtain similar early effectiveness. However, arthroscopic surgery has the advantages of being able to simultaneously deal with intra-articular combined injuries, avoiding internal fixator complications, and eliminating the need for secondary operation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of autograft versus allograft tendon for posterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2015), EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from inception to August 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials, clinical controlled trials and cohort studies of autograft tendon versus allograft tendon for posterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 7 cohort studies involving 376 patients who had undergone the arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle PCL reconstruction were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that no significant differences were found between the autograft group and the allograft group in Lysholm score (MD=-0.54, 95%CI -2.36 to 1.27, P=0.56), Tegner score (MD=-0.04, 95%CI -0.88 to 0.80, P=0.93), IKDC objective score (OR=1.31, 95%CI 0.68 to 2.53, P=0.41) and posterior translation side-to-side difference (SMD=-0.15, 95%CI -0.37 to 0.07, P=0.18). However, patients in the allograft group had a longer duration of fever when compared with the autograft group patients (MD=-3.55, 95%CI-5.61 to -1.49, P=0.0007). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that autograft tendon and allograft tendon tibial have similar effects in PCL single-bundle reconstruction, though there is a longer duration of fever in patients with allograft. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To compare the single femoral tunnel split-double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with the singlebundle PCL reconstruction and to discuss the advantages of the modified reconstruction method. Methods Fourteen donated fresh-frozen human knee specimens were biomechanically tested, which included knee specimens from 12 males and 2 females, and their ages ranged from 20 to 31 years. The specimen length of the femur and the tibia was 20 cm. The tibial posterior translation and the PCL strains were first measured when PCL was in an intact state (the intact group, n=14). Then, PCL was cut (the cut group, n=14). The posterior translation was measured when a posterior load was applied. After that, the specimens were randomly divided into twogroups: the single-bundle group (n=7) and the double-bundle group (n=7). When the posterior load was applied to the tibia, the bundle strain and the tibial posterior translation were measured with the knees flexed at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120°, respectively. Results While a 100 N posterior force was applied, the posterior tibial displacement of the intact PCL knee ranged from 1.97±0.29 mm to 2.60±0.23 mm at the different knee flexion angles. In the PCL-cutstate, the tibial displacement increased significantly from 11.27±1.06 mm to14.94±0.67 mm (P＜0.05). After the singlebundle reconstruction, the posterior tibial translation ranged from 1.99±0.19 mm to 2.72±0.38 mm at the different knee flexion angles. In the split-double-bundle reconstruction, the posterior tibial translations ranged from 2.27±0.32 mm to 3.05±0.44 mm. The graft of the single-bundle reconstruction was tensioned from 0° to 120°, and the tibial displacement increased significantly at 90° compared with that at theother angles(P＜0.05). In the doublebundle reconstruction, the anterolateral bundle and the posteromedial bundle were tensioned in a reciprocal fashion, and the tibial displacement had no significant difference at the five kinds of the flexion angles. ConclusionThe single femoral tunnel split-double-bundle PCL reconstruction canrestore the posterior tibial displacement at different flexion angles, and the tibial displacement in the single-bundle PCL reconstruction knee can be increased when the knee flexion is at 90°. In the double-bundle reconstruction, the graftcan be tensioned in a reciprocal fashion and the biomechanical features can be nearer to those of the normal PCL bundles.
Objective To investigate whether the outlet of the femoral tunnel will cause iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) and estimate the safe angle of femoral tunnel placement. MethodsThirteen formaldehyde-soaked human knee joint specimens were used, 8 from men and 5 from women; the donors’ age ranged from 49 to 71 years, with an average of 61 years. First, the medial part of the femur was carefully dissected to clearly expose the region of the MCL course and attachment on the femoral medial aspect and to outline the anterior margin of the region with a marked line. The marked line divided the medial femoral condyle into an area with an MCL course and a bare bone area which is regarded relatively safe for no MCL course. Then, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was cut to identify the femoral attachment of the PCL. After the knee joint was fixed at a 120° flexion angle, the process of femoral tunnel preparation for the PCL single-bundle reconstruction was simulated. The inside-out technique was used to drill the femoral tunnel from the PCL femoral footprint inside the knee joint with an orientation to exit the medial condyle of the femur, and the combination angle of the two planes, the axial plane and the coronal plane, was adapted to the process of drilling femoral tunnels at different orientations. The following 15 angle combinations were used in the study: 0°/30°, 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/30°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, 30°/30°, 30°/45°, 30°/60°, 45°/30°, 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, 60°/60° (axial/coronal). The positional relationship between the femoral tunnel outlet on the femoral medial condyle and the marked line was used to verify whether the tunnel drilling angle was a risk factor for MCL injury or not, and whether the shortest distance between the femoral exit center and the marked line was affected by the various angle combinations. Furthermore, the safe orientation of the femoral tunnel placement would estimated. ResultsWhen creating the femoral tunnel for PCLR, there was a risk of damage to the MCL caused by the tunnel outlet, and the incidence was from 0 to 100%; when the drilling angle of the axial plane was 0° and 15°, the incidence of MCL damage was from 69.23% to 100%. There was a significant difference in the incidence of MCL damage among femoral tunnels of 15 angle combinations (χ2=148.195, P<0.001). By comparison between groups, it was found that when drilling femoral tunnels at 5 combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal), the shortest distances between the tunnel exit and the marked line were significantly different than 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, and 30°/30° (axial/coronal) (P<0.05). Additionally, after comparing the median of the shortest distance with other groups, the outlets generated by these 5 angles were farther from the marked line and the posterior MCL. ConclusionThe creation of the femoral tunnel in PCLR can cause iatrogenic MCL injury, and the risk is affected by the tunnel angle. To reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury, angle combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal) are recommended for preparing the femoral tunnel in PCLR.