目的 探讨前路小切口顶椎切除联合后路矫形手术治疗重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸的可行性及疗效。 方法 2009 年7月－2010年9月，采用前路小切口顶椎切除联合后路矫形手术治疗重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸18例。其中男9例，女9例，年龄10～24岁，平均14.5岁。其中15 例特发性脊柱侧凸（Lenke 2型6例，Lenke 3型1例，Lenke 4型8例），2 例脊髓空洞合并脊柱侧凸，1 例Chiari畸形合并脊柱侧凸。术前剃刀背高度（6.8 ± 2.3）cm，主胸弯Cobb角（99.6 ±10.0）°，主胸弯顶椎偏距（7.3 ± 1.3）cm。 结果 前路手术切口10～13 cm，平均（11.4 ± 1.0）cm；前路手术时间170～300 min，平均（215.3 ± 36.8）min；失血量300～1 300 mL，平均（662.5 ± 274.8） mL。所有患者随访25～39个月，平均30.7个月。末次随访时，剃刀背高度（1.0 ± 0.6）cm，矫正率86.7%；主胸弯Cobb角（31.4 ± 11.4）°，矫正率68.7%；主胸弯顶椎偏距（2.2 ± 0.9） cm，矫正率69.6%。上胸弯、胸腰弯/腰弯的Cobb 角及顶椎偏距亦明显矫正，冠状面及矢状面平衡与术前相比，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。未发生神经系统并发症，1例患者在前路手术后入ICU行呼吸支持治疗12 h，1例患者出现椎弓根螺钉穿透椎弓根上壁，2例患者出现钛网位置不佳，随访未见钛网位置改变。 结论 采用前路小切口顶椎切除联合后路矫形治疗重度僵硬性脊柱侧凸安全可行，矫形效果满意。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of surgical treatment for 30 patients with discogenic low back pain. Methods A total of 30 patients with 36 intervertebral discs were treated with posterior approach lumbar discectomy and interbody fusion with internal fixation by strict criteria. All patients were followed up for one year. The low back pain before and one year after surgery was evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Results The patients’ JOA score increased from 14.6±2.3 (before operation) to 27.1±0.9 (one year after operation) (t=–26.936, P<0.001), while the patients’ VAS score decreased from 6.2±1.6 (before operation) to 1.4±0.9 (one year after operation) (t=16.335, P<0.001), and the differences were significant. Conclusion When the conservative treatment is invalid, the operation of posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion is an effective method for the patinets with discogenic low back pain.
ObjectiveTo increase the advantage and decrease the disadvantage of posterior approach for uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) right upper lobectomy.MethodsData of 97 consecutive patients who received uniportal VATS right upper lobectomy using posterior approach in the semiprone position were retrospectively analyzed from Dec, 2014 to Dec, 2017. There were 41 males and 56 females at age of 26–79 (57.8±10.6) years. The hilar structure was cut from posterior to anterior one by one. The mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected if lung cancer was diagnosed.ResultsNinety three of 97 patients were successfully completed with uniportal VATS right upper lobectomy using posterior approach, 3 of them were completed with posterior approach combined with anterior approach, and 1 of them needed thoracotomy. The mean operative time was 76–192 (127.0±32.0) min. The thoracic drainage time was 2–20 (3.4±2.7) d. The postoperative length of hospital stay was 3–23 (5.4±3.1) d. There were postoperative complications in 7 patients and no postoperative mortality.ConclusionPosterior approach for uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery right upper lobectomy is safe and feasible, which can decrease the fatigue of both the surgeon and the assistant. It also provides with better exposure of posterior mediastinum, less dragging lung, and less interference of the instruments and help keep the clear surgical field. In complicated cases, posterior approach could combine with anterior approach to complete the VATS lobectomy.
Objective To introduce operation skill of the spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach for correction of severe rigid scol iosis and to discuss the selection of the indications and the range of fusion and fixation. Methods Between July 1999 and January 2009, 23 patients with severe rigid scol iosis were treated with spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach, including 16 congenital scol iosis, 5 idiopathic scol iosis, and 2 neurofibromatosis scol iosis. There were 11 males and 12 females with a median age of 15 years (range, 8-29 years). Two patients had previous surgery history. The Cobb’s angles of scol iosis and kyphosis before operation were (85.39 ± 13.51)° and (56.78 ± 17.69)°, respectively. The mean spinal flexibil ity was 14.4% (range, 4.7%-22.5%). The trunk shift was (15.61 ± 4.89) mm. The preoperative CT or MRI showed bony septum in the canal in 2 patients. Results The mean operative time was 241 minutes and the mean blood loss was 1 452 mL. The average fused vertebrae were 10.7 segaments (range, 8-14 segaments). The follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years with an average of 2 years and 6 months. The postoperative Cobb’s angle of scol iosis was (38.70 ± 6.51)°, the average correction rate was 54.7%. The postoperative Cobb’s angle of kyphosis was (27.78 ± 6.01)°, the average correction rate was 51.0%. The trunk shift was improved to (4.69 ± 1.87) mm, the increased height was 5.2 cm on average (range, 2.8-7.7 cm). The Cobb’s angle of scol iosis was (41.57 ± 6.80)° with an average 2.9° loss of correction at the final follow-up; the Cobb’s angle of kyphosis was (30.39 ± 5.94)° with an average 2.6° loss of correction at the final follow-up; the trunk shift was (4.78 ± 2.00) mm at the final follow-up. There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in the Cobb’s angles of scol iosis and kyphosis and the trunk shift between preoperation and postoperation, between preoperation and last follow-up. Four cases had pedicle fracture, 1 had L1 nerve root injury, 2 had superior mesenteric artery syndrome, 1 had exudates of incision, and 2 had temporary dysfunction of both lower extremity. Conclusion Spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach is a rel iable and safe surgical technique for correcting severe rigid scol iosis. With segmental pedical screw fixation, both the spinal balance and stabil ity can be restored.
Objective To investigate the effect of the sequence of intermediate instrumentation with long screws and distraction-reduction on mild to moderate thoracolumbar fractures treated by posterior open and short-segmental fixation. MethodsThe clinical data of 68 patients with mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group ISDRF (intermediate screws then distraction-reduction fixation, 32 cases) and group DRISF (distraction-reduction then intermediate screws fixation, 36 cases) according to the different operation methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, and preoperative load-sharing classification score, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score, vertebral canal occupational rate, back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior height of fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The vertebral canal occupational rate, anterior height of fractured vertebra, kyphosis Cobb angle, and back pain VAS score before and after operation were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). No vascular or spinal nerve injury and deep infections or skin infections occurred in both groups. At 1 week after operation, the vertebral canal occupational rate in the two groups was significantly improved when compared with that before operation (P<0.05), no significant difference was found in the difference of vertebral canal occupational rate before and after operation and improvement between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up 18-24 months, with an average of 22.3 months. All vertebral fractures reached bone union at 6 months postoperatively. At last follow-up, there was no internal fixation failures such as broken screws, broken rods or loose screws, but there were 2 cases of mild back pain in the ISDRF group. The intra-group comparison showed that the back pain VAS score, the anterior height of fractured vertebra, and the Cobb angle of the two groups were significantly improved at each time point postoperatively (P<0.05); the VAS scores at 12 months postoperatively and last follow-up were also improved when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the anterior height of fractured vertebra in the ISDRF group was significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05), the Cobb angle had a significant loss when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05); the anterior height of fractured vertebra and Cobb angle in DRISF group were not significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P>0.05). The comparison between groups showed that there was no significant difference in the remission rate of VAS score between the two groups at 1 week postoperatively (P>0.05), the recovery value of the anterior height of fractured vertebra in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group (P<0.05), the loss rate at last follow-up was also significantly higher (P<0.05); the correction rate of Cobb angle in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the loss rate of Cobb angle between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). ConclusionIn the treatment of mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior short-segment fixation, the instrumentation of long screws in the injured vertebrae does not affect the reduction of the fracture fragments in the spinal canal. DRISF can better maintain the restored anterior height of the fractured vertebra and reduce the loss of kyphosis Cobb angle during the follow-up, indicating a better long-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo explore the surgical indications,decompression and fusion method,and fusion level selection of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis. MethodsBetween April 2000 and November 2011,46 cases of DLS and multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis were treated with multi-level decompression by fenestration and crept enlargement plus internal fixation by interbody and posterior-lateral bone graft fusion (5 segments or above).Of 46 cases,25 were male and 21 were female,with a mean age of 70.2 years (range,65-81 years) and with a mean disease duration of 6.4 years (range,4 years and 6 months to 13 years).X-ray films showed that the lumbar Cobb angle was (26.7±10.0)°,and the lumbar lordotic angle was (20.3±8.8)°.The lumbar CT and MRI images showed three-segment stenosis in 24 cases,four-segment stenosis in 17 cases,and five-segment stenosis in 5 cases.A total of 165 stenosed segments included 12 L1,2,34 L2,3,43 L3,4,45 L4,5,and 31 L5 and S1.Visual analogue scale (VAS) score,Oswestry disability index (ODI),and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score (29 points) were employed to evaluate effectiveness. ResultsThirteen patients had leakage of cerebrospinal fluid during operation,and no infection was found after corresponding treatment; pulmonary infection and urinary system infection occurred in 4 and 2 patients respectively,who relieved after received antibiotic therapy; 8 patients with poor wound healing received dressing change,adequate drainage,debridement and suture.No death,paralysis,central nervous system infection,or other complication was observed in these patients.Forty-six cases were followed up 12-72 months (mean,36.2 months).Lumbago and backache and intermittent claudication of lower extremity were obviously improved.During follow-up,no screw incising,loosening and broken screws,or pseudarthrosis was noted under X-ray film and CT scanning.At last follow-up,the lumbar Cobb angle was reduced to (9.8±3.6)°,while the lumbar lordotic angle was increased to (34.1±9.4)°,which were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (t=16.935,P=0.000;t=15.233,P=0.000).At last follow-up,VAS,ODI,and JOA scores were 3.2±1.2,35.5%±14.0%,and 26.6±5.7 respectively,showing significant differences when compared with preoperative scores (8.0±2.2,60.8%±13.3%,and 12.9±3.4) (t=19.857,P=0.000;t=16.642,P=0.000;t=15.922,P=0.000). ConclusionMulti-segment decompression by fenestration and crept enlargement plus internal fixation by interbody and posterior-lateral bone graft fusion is helpful to relieve nerve compression symptoms,rebuild spinal balance,and improve the life quality of the patients.It is a very effective way to treat DLS and multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis.
Objective From the viewpoint of health economics, to analyse the cost-utility of Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and 360° fusion in the treatment of single level lumbar degenerative disease, so as to provide references to doctors and patients for making the best solution. Methods From October 2008 to November 2010, a prospective non-randomized controlled study was carried out on the patients diagnosed as L4-L5 degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, of whom Group A were treated by posterior decompression combined with Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and Group B accepted lumbar 360° fusion treatment. The SF-36 questionnaire was used to survey the life quality of patients and to calculate the quality-adjusted life year (QALY); meanwhile, the costs of the treatment were collected to compare the cost-utility ratio between the two groups. Results A total of 60 patients were included, among whom 29 patients including 20 males and 9 females were in Group A, and the other 31 patients including 16 males and 15 females were in Group B; and the mean time of follow-up was 16.4 months (12-23 months). The average age of Group A and Group B was 45.1 years (21-67 years) and 56.2 years (32-86 years), respectively; the medical costs were 51 509.9±2 422.9 yuan and 57 409.7±9 072.9 yuan, respectively; the life quality compared with that of pre-operation improved by 42.60% and 42.82%, respectively; the cost-utility ratios were 69165.6±4716.0 yuan/QALY and 77 976.7±12 757.4 yuan/QALY, respectively. For each increase of one QALY, Group A could save 12.74% of the cost compared with Group B. Conclusion Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction has the equal short-term effects to lumbar 360° fusion in the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, but it has lower costs than the latter, and is more in line with the requirements of health economics.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical outcomes of modified posterior-anterior operation in the treatment of serious lumbar fracture and dislocation. Methods From January 2002 to February 2006, 24 patients, 17 males and 7 females aged 22-69 years, underwent reduction of posterior spatium intermuscular approach combined with modified anterioroperation. Nine cases were caused by fall ing and 15 by traffic accident, involving: L1 in 5 cases, L2 in 10 cases, L3 in 4 cases, L4 in 2 case, L1,2 in 1 case and L3,4 in 2 cases. According to the Frankel grade, there were 5 cases for grade A, 11 for grade B, 7 for grade C and 1 for grade D. The recovery of neurological function was evaluated. The imageology examination was appl ied to evaluate the condition of internal fixation and bone union. The Cobb’s angle was measured by X-ray film before operation, 3 days after operation and at the final follow-up, and the difference was estimated. Results Nineteen patients were followed up for 8-52 months, 28.4 months on average. Among the 2 cases of grade A, one improved to C and the other had no improvement. Among the 9 cases of grade B, 5 improved to C, 2 improved to D, and other two had no improvement. Among the 7 cases of grade C, 5 improved to D and 2 improved to E. One case of grade D improved to E. The average Cobb’s angle was (—11.5 ± 4.6)° preoperatively, (4.2 ± 4.7)° 3 days after operation and (4.0 ± 4.8)° at the final follow-up, indicating there was a significant difference between preoperation, 3 days after operation and the final follow-up (P lt; 0.001), but no significant difference between 3 days after operation and the final follow-up (P gt; 0.05). The position of internal fixation was good during follow-up. The compl ications such as disruption, loosening and collapse were not observed. Conclusion Reduction of posterior spatium intermuscular approach combined with modified anterior operation in the treatment of serious lumbar fracture and dislocation could complete the reduction, decompression, grafting and internal fixation in one stage, and protect the paraspinal soft tissue and minimize the trauma caused by surgery. It has the merits of short time of operation, small amount of intraoperative hemorrhage, sol id union of internal fixation and satisfactory cl inical outcome.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) combined with Prospace and facet fusion using local autograft. Methods Clinical and radiographic data of 76 patients treated by this technique was reviewed from May 2002 to December 2004. Of them, there were 52 males and 24 females, with an average age of 53.2 years (2381 years), including 60 cases of degenerative disc disease, 9 cases of failed back surgery syndrome and 3 cases of spondylolysis. The disese courses were 1.2-8.7 years (mean 3.6 years). The levels of PLIF were:L 2,3 in 2 cases, L 3,4 in 7, L 4,5 in 54, L 5/S 1 in 10, L 4/S 1 in 1 and L 5,6 in 2. After decompression，Prospace was inserted into interbody space bilaterally，and located in disc space 4 mm beyond the rear edge ofthe vertebral body. Local laminectomy autograft was packed both laterally into and between 2 implants. Then the remanent local autograft was placed over facet bed. Pedicle screws were used after insertion of Prospace. Clinical results wereevaluated by the JOA score. Disc height ratio and lumbar lordosis angles were measured on lateral radiographs. Fusion status was determined by evidence of bridge trabeculae across facet joint and interbody space on CT scan without mobility in lateral dynamic X-rays, and no radiolucent gap between Prospace and endplate. Paired t test was used for statistical analysis. Results Mean blood loss and operative time was 384 ml and 178 minutes, respectively. The average JOA score at final follow-up (26.1±2.7) was significantly improved when compared with that of preoperation (14.5±4.0, P＜0.05), with a mean recovery rate of JOA score 81.1% (37.5%-100.0%). The fusion rate was 974%(74/76). Mean disc height ratio and the involved segmental lordosis angle were increased from preoperative 0.27± 0.07 and 5.8±2.2° to 0.33±0.06 and 11.3±2.0° respectively at the final followup, and the differences were significant (P＜0.05). There were no devicerelated complications. Conclusion This surgical technique combined with Prospace interbody device is a safe and effective surgical option for patients with onelevel lumbar disorders when PLIF is warranted.