ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of perampanel (PER) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) monotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed focal epilepsy in adults. Methods A total of 62 adult patients with focal epilepsy, aged 18~79 years old, with an average age of (40.53±16.69) years, were enrolled from Qingyuan People’s Hospital between August 2021 and October 2022 and randomly divided into PER group and OXC groups. Both groups were followed up for 12 months and assessed for seizure free rate, effective rate, drug retention rate, and adverse reactions at 3, 6, and 12th months. ResultsThe results showed that the seizure free rate, effective rate, and drug retention rate in the PER group were 62.5%, 71.9% and 87.5% at 3 months, respectively, and 53.1%, 65.6% and 75.0% at 6 months respectively. In the OXC group, the seizure free rate, effective rate, and drug retention rate were 70.0%, 86.7%, and 93.3% at 3 months, respectively, and 66.7%, 73.3% and 83.3% at 6 months, respectively. At 12 months, the seizure free rate, effective rate and retention rate of the PER group were 43.8%, 46.9%, and 53.1%, respectively; The seizure free rate, effective rate, and retention rate of OXC group were 66.7%, 66.7%, and 70.0%, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in the PER group and OXC group was 15.6% and 16.7%, respectively. The most common adverse reactions in both groups were dizziness and drowsiness, with no serious adverse events. ConclusionPER and OXC monotherapy demonstrated similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of newly diagnosed adult focal epilepsy, and both drugs can be used as safe and effective treatment options.
Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are the most important and basic treatment for epilepsy, and are also the first choice for epilepsy treatment, but about one-third of patients have drug resistance. Perampanel (PER), as a novel third generation ASMs, inhibits the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) through non-competitive inhibition. AMPA plays an anti-seizure role. Since its approval in China in 2021, it has been mainly used in the treatment of focal epilepsy (with or without general seizure) as a single drug or addition, and has good safety, effectiveness and tolerability. Self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS) is a common childhood focal epilepsy syndrome, accounting for 15% ~ 25% of various childhood epilepsies, PER has important advantages in clinical studies and has shown certain curative effect. At the same time, the overall effect of PER on cognition was neutral, with no systemic cognitive deterioration or improvement. In view of the relatively short application time of PER, which is still a new drug, this article will review the mechanism of action, dose, add-on (single drug) treatment, adverse events and, in order to provide clinicians with more drug choices and facilitate the individualized diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy.
Epilepsy is a common chronic disease of the nervous system, which has certain adverse effects on the cognitive, psychological and social functions of the patients. To date, anti-seizure medications (ASMs) remain the first-line treatment option for epilepsy, but many patients with epilepsy still do not have effective seizure control when multiple ASMs are used in combination. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a new target and mechanism ASMs to bring about new treatment options and hope for patients with intractable epilepsy. Perampanel, a new third-generation ASMs, whereas second-generation ASMs tend to exert anti-seizure effects mainly by regulating ion channels or enhancing related mechanisms such as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) effects, perampanel exerts its effects mainly by targeting the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. Perampanel is the first selective α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate (AMPA) receptor antagonist and the first selective inhibitory ASMs for excitatory postsynaptic function. Because of its unique target and mechanism, it has been approved by many countries in the world for adjuvant additive therapy and monotherapy for patients with focal and general epilepsy. In addition, with the discovery of the neuroprotective, antioxidant, neurotransmitter regulation effects of perampanel, it also provides a new potential choice for the treatment of other diseases. This article mainly reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and treatment of other diseases other than epilepsy of perampanel.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of Perampanel (PER) monotherapy in the treatment of self limited epilepsy with central temporal spikes (SeLECTS). Methods The clinical data of the first confirmed SelECTS in the outpatient and inpatient department of Xuzhou Children's Hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University in December 2021 were collected, and the clinical data of PER monotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The Seizure of 12 months old children were followed up to observe the efficacy and safety of PER monotherapy with spikes in the central temporal region, and the changes of Electroencephalography were observed. Result A total of 45 children with SeLECTS were included, of which 43 had complete medical records, including 13 males and 30 females, aged 4 ~ 14 years old, with a course of disease ranging from 1 month to 1.5 years. All 45 patients had focal seizures or focal secondary generalized tonic clonic seizures. Among them, 43 patients treated with PER alone for 12 months had epilepsy control efficacy rates of 74.41% (32/43) and no seizure rates of 60.46% (26/43), respectively. Seven children (15.56%, 7/45) experienced adverse reactions, characterized by dizziness, unstable gait, and irritability. Conclusion The third generation anti Seizure drug PER has a clear effect in the treatment of SelECTS, 2 ~ 4 mg PER can control Seizure well, and has no significant impact on cognitive development.
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of Perampanel (PER) monotherapy in children with focal epilepsy. Methods Forty-six children with focal epilepsy who were newly diagnosed in the Department of Neurology of Wuxi Children's Hospital and had not used anti-seizure medications during January 2021 to June 2022 were selected, including 24 males and 22 females, with an average age of (7.2 ± 2.4) years old. Mono-therapy of PER as the PER group (23 cases), mono-therapy of Levetiracetam (LEV) as the LEV group (23 cases). Compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions between the two groups. Result The total effective rate was 87.0% (20/23) in PER group and 73.9% (17/23) in LEV group after 3 months of treatment (P<0.05); the total effective rate in the PER group was 78.3% (18/23), and 60.9% (14/23) in the LEV group after 6 months of treatment (P<0.05). The differences were statistically significant. In the PER group, 2 children had adverse reactions, 1 case was lethargic, and 1 case was dizziness. By temporarily reducing the drug dose and slowing the rate of dosing, the adverse reactions disappeared. In LEV group, 3 children had adverse reactions, all of who were irritable in varying degrees. By slowing down the rate of drug addition, 2 children’s symptoms disappeared and 1 child's symptoms relieved during 3 ~ 6 months. Conclusion The new anti-seizure medication — PER has a better anti-epileptic effect on focal epilepsy, which is better than LEV. The adverse reactions of both drugs are less and mild, and can be selected according to clinical conditions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety tolerance of perampanel in the treatment of Chinese adult epilepsy patients. Methods Clinical data of adult epileptic patients treated with perampanel in Department of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University from January 2020 to December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively by self-control method, including demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, changes of epileptic seizures before and after perampanel treatment and adverse events during the treatment of perampanel. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of perampanel in Chinese adult epileptic patients. Results A total of 69 adult epileptic patients with complete follow-up data were included. The dosage range of perampanel was 2 ~ 8 mg. The total effective rate was 68.1%, and the seizure-free rate was 17.4%. The most common adverse reactions were mood change and dizziness, the incidence of adverse reactions was 52.2%, and the incidence of serious adverse reactions was 0.0%. In terms of analysis of influencing factors of efficacy, the results showed that single drug therapy or combination therapy, type of combined antiepileptic drug and treatment time of perampanel did not affect the efficacy (P>0.05), while dosage was an important factor affecting the efficacy of perampanel (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in efficacy between the focal epilepsy group and the general epilepsy group (P>0.05). In terms of the analysis of factors related to the occurrence of adverse reactions, the results showed that the occurrence of adverse reactions was related to the dosage of perampanel (P<0.05), and was independent of whether it was monotherapy, the addition time of perampanel and the type of combined antiepileptic agents (P>0.05). Conclusion Perampanel has good efficacy and safety tolerance in the treatment of epilepsy in Chinese adults. Both monotherapy and additive therapy can effectively control seizures, and has a good effect on different seizure types. The most common adverse events during treatment were mood changes and dizziness, which could be alleviated and tolerated by most patients with prolonged treatment.
Objective To observe the efficacy and adverse reactions of pirenpanet in patients with refractory epilepsy treated with add-on therapy. MethodsForty-one patients with medically refractory epilepsy were selected from January 2021 to December 2021 in the Department of Epilepsy of Jiamusi Central Hospital, among which 25 males and 16 females. The self-control study was conducted before and after the treatment with pirenpanet. The observation period was 1 year, and the clinical efficacy, platelet, liver and kidney function and EEG discharge index were observed at 6 months and 12 months respectively. Changes in seizure frequency after treatment were divided into the following 3 groups: effective control: no seizure; effective: seizures reduced by 50% ~ 99%; Ineffective: < 50% reduction in seizures or exacerbation. Results Among the 41 patients with drug-refractory epilepsy, 8 (8/41, 19.51% P < 0.05) were seizure-free, 17 (17/41, 41.46% P < 0.05) were effective, and the total effective rate was (25/41, 60.98%); Sixteen cases (16/41, 39.02%) were ineffective. There were 31 children in 41 cases (31/41, 75.61%), of which 18 cases (18/31, 58.06%) were effective, 16 cases (16/31, 51.61%) had mental and motor retardation, and 8 cases (8/16, 50%) were effective; There were 10 adults (10/41, 24.39%) and 7 effective patients (7/10, 70%). After one year's treatment, the EEG changes of the patients were observed, and the abnormal discharge of 6 patients was reduced according to the discharge index, 2 patients had no abnormal discharge, and the other patients had no obvious EEG changes. Conclusion Pirenpanet is effective and safe as an add-on therapy for medically refractory epilepsy.