ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
摘要:目的:定量测定50 %小儿在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度。方法:25例择期行四肢及体表手术的患儿,高流量吸入七氟烷诱导并以七氟烷和氧化亚氮维持麻醉,不使用肌肉松弛剂及静脉麻醉药物,手术结束后停止吸入氧化亚氮,并维持设定的七氟烷浓度10min后拔除喉罩。根据Dixon序贯法确定喉罩拔除时的七氟烷浓度,每0.1 Vol%七氟烷为1个增减单位。患儿未出现咳嗽、牙关紧闭、体动、屏气及喉痉挛则认为拔除喉罩平稳。结果:50 %小儿平稳拔除喉罩时呼气末七氟烷浓度(EC50)为1.22 Vol%(95 %的置信区间分别为0.99 Vol%～1.49 Vol%)。结论:在喉罩表面涂抹丁卡因胶浆的情况下,3～8岁患儿喉罩满意拔除时呼气末七氟烷EC50值为1.22 Vol%。Abstract: Objective: To determine the concentration of sevoflurane where 50%( EC50 ) of the attempts to remove the laryngeal mask airway (LMA ) with the Teracainum Gel would be successful in children. Methods: Twentyfive nonpremedicated children, aged 38 years old, ASA physical status I, scheduled for extremities or peripherical surgery were enrolled in this study. General anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. After the surgery, the target concentration was maintained for at least 10 min, and then the LMA was removed. Each target concentration was predetermined by the Dixon’s upanddown method (with 0.1 Vol% as a step size), starting at 1.20 Vol% concentration of sevoflurane. A removal accomplished without coughing, teeth clenching, gross purposeful movement, breath holding or laryngospasm, during or within 1 min after removal was considered to be successful. Results:The concentration of sevoflurane to achieve successful LMA removal in 50% of children was 1.22 Vol% (95%CL, 0.99 Vol%1.49 Vol%). Conclusion: The EC50 value of sevoflurane for LMA smooth extubation in children aged 38 years old with teracainum gel was 1.22 Vol%.
目的评价喉罩或单腔气管内插管在胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的应用效果。 方法选择80例行胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的手汗症患者，采用计算机随机法将患者分为A、B两组，每组各40例。其中A组男20例、女20例，平均年龄24岁；B组男21例、女19例，平均年龄23岁。A组使用喉罩通气，B组使用单腔气管内导管，均应用小潮气量较快频率正压通气及间歇人工气胸。观察两组麻醉期间各时点心率（HR）、平均动脉压（MAP）、呼气末二氧化碳分压（PetCO2）、动脉血氧饱和度（SpO2）、心电图（ECG）的变化。同时记录喉罩/单腔导管置入时间、CO2充气时间、手术时间、术中术后不良反应和并发症。 结果两组患者手术顺利，无并发症。A组喉罩/插管置入时间和喉罩/单腔管呛咳、术后咽喉疼痛发生率低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。B组MAP、HR水平在T2（喉罩/单腔管置入后）和T7（苏醒后拨喉罩/单腔管时）明显高于T1（麻醉诱导完成），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组MAP、HR水平在T2和T7时亦明显低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。所有患者术中ECG、SpO2和PetCO2无明显变化。 结论喉罩或单腔气管内插管结合间歇的人工气胸都能满足胸交感神经切断术的操作需要，喉罩具有更稳定的血流动力学状态和更高的安全性。
ObjectiveTo evaluate if intravenous lidocaine can reduce the stress response induced by fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients under general anesthesia. MethodsSixty patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy under unconsciousness between November 2013 and July 2014 were randomly divided into two groups: lidocaine group (n=30) and control group (n=30). Patients in the lidocaine group received an intravenous injection of lidocaine for 1 mg/kg during induction and then continuous intravenous infusion of 2% lidocaine with a dose of 3 mg/(kg·h). The same volume of saline was given to patients of the control group in the same way. Laryngeal mask airway was placed after anesthesia induction. Variables of heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and pulse oxygen saturation were observed and recorded at five time points: before induction, immediately after induction, immediately after laryngeal mask airway placement, fiberoptic bronchoscopy across tracheal carina and before leaving examination room. Complications including cough reflex, toxicity reaction of local anesthetics, and injection pain were also observed. ResultsThe examination was successfully completed in all patients. Blood pressure and heart rate increased in all patients when fiberoptic bronchoscopy got across tracheal carina. There were no statistically significant differences in the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in the two groups had no statistic difference in tinnitus and numbness of tongue (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, patients in the lidocaine group had lower incidence of injection pain (P<0.05). ConclusionIntravenous lidocaine cannot suppress stress response induced by fiberoptic bronchoscopy effectively.
目的 探讨双管喉罩与气管插管用于全身麻醉妇科腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性。 方法 2009年1月-5月择期妇科腹腔镜手术患者60例，ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级，随机分为喉罩组（P组）和气管插管组（T组）。记录入室基础值（T0），置罩（管）前（T1），置罩（管）后即刻（T2），置罩（管）后5 min（T3 ），拔除罩（管）即刻（T4），拔除罩（管）后5 min（T5）的收缩压（systolic pressure, SBP），舒张压（diastolic pressure, DBP），心率（heart rate, HR）和脉搏血氧饱和度（pulse oxygen saturation, SpO2），喉罩和气管插管控制呼吸时气腹前后不同时段的气道峰压（airway. maximum pressure, Pmax），潮气量（vital volume, VT）和呼气末二氧化碳分压（end tidal CO2, PETCO2）。记录插罩（管）成功率，及相关并发症。 结果 T2时T组SBP，DBP和HR显著高于P组（P＜0.05），两组术中通气均满意；Pmax，VT和PETCO2组间比较各时点无差异（P＞0.05）。气腹后Pmax和PETCO2组内比较均高于气腹前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。置罩（管）成功率组间比较差异无统计学意义，拔罩（管）期及术后24 h并发症，喉罩组明显低于气管导管组，差异显著（P＜0.05）。 结论 双管喉罩用于全麻妇科腹腔镜手术通气效果满意，安全可行。
【摘要】 目的 比较喉罩和气管内插管吸入七氟烷全麻用于小儿无痛苦纤支镜检查的麻醉效果、苏醒时间、苏醒质量。 方法 将2008年3月-2009年3月40例行纤支镜检查的患儿随机分为喉罩组（L组，21例）和气管内插管组（T组，19例）。两组均采用逐渐诱导法吸入七氟烷，静脉给予芬太尼1 μg/kg；L组置入喉罩，T组气管插管后控制呼吸。手术中，两组均吸入2%～5%七氟烷维持麻醉。分别记录麻醉前（T0）、麻醉后纤支镜进入前（T1）、进镜至咽部（T2）、声门部（T3）、气管内（T4）及第15 min（T5）时的血压（BP）、心率（HR）、MAP和动脉血氧饱和度（SPO2）。观察纤支镜检查期间有无呛咳、气道痉挛或体动；记录停药至拔管的时间，苏醒后是否再入睡及麻醉满意度。 结果 两组HR在T1、T3、T4时升高，与T0时比较，有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）；其中HR在T1时T组高于L组，组间比较有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）；MAP在T1、T2、T3、T4时，T组低于L组，组间比较有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。两组患儿镜检期间均无呛咳、气道痉挛或体动；L组苏醒时间短于T组（Plt;0.05），苏醒后再入睡率低于T组（Plt;0.05），麻醉满意度高于T组（Plt;0.05）。 结论 喉罩吸入七氟烷全麻用于小儿无痛苦纤支镜检查，能保证稳定的血流动力学状态，苏醒快速，效果满意。【Abstract】 Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of Laryngeal mask combined with sevoflurane in painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy anesthesia in children. Methods Forty children from March 2008 to March 2009 were randomized divided into laryngeal mask airway group (group L) and endotracheal intubation group (group T). Anaesthesia was induced and maintenanced with 2%-5% sevoflurane and fentanyl 1 μg/kg. The blood pressure (BR), heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter (SPO2)were recorded before anaesthesia (T0), immediately after anaesthesia induction (T1), when FOB at the level of pharynx(T2), vocal cords (T3), trachea (T4) and in 15 min of the FOB (T5). Extubation time, recovery quality and anesthesia effects were also analyzed. Results Compared with T0, there were significant increases in HR at T1、T3 and T4 (Plt;0.05), and HR was significantly higher in the group T than that in the group L at T1 (Plt;0.05). MAP was significantly lower in group T than that in group L at T1、T2、T3 and T4, respectively(Plt;0.05). Recovery time was significantly shorter in group L than that in group T. Incidence of sleep after recovery was lower in group L than that in group T. Anesthesia satisfaction was higher in the group L than that in the group T. Conclusions Laryngeal mask combined with Sevoflurane provide satisfactory anesthesia for painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children.
Objective To investigate the effective dose of remimazolam benzenesulfonate to suppress cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask placement in elderly patients. Methods Elderly patients undergoing laryngeal mask anesthesia between March and June 2023 were selected. Combined with sulfentanil 0.2 μg/kg, remimazolam was used as induction hypnotic. The first patient was given remizolam benzenesulfonate 0.16 mg/kg infused by pump for 1 min. The dose of remimazolam for the next patient was determined by the biased coin up-and-down method based on the patient’s response to the laryngeal mask placement. The score of Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alert/Sedation, vital signs and anesthesia depth index (AI) were recorded during induction. Probit analysis was used to calculate the half effective dose (ED50), 95% effective dose (ED95) and half effective AI (AI50). According to the statistical requirements, at least 45 negative patients were required. Results A total of 53 elderly patients were enrolled in the study until the end of the trial. The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam benzenesulfonate for inhibiting cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask insertion were 0.154 mg/kg [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.034, 0.170) mg/kg] and 0.207 mg/kg [95%CI (0.190, 0.614) mg/kg], respectively. AI decreased during induction, with an AI50 of 64.119 [95%CI (60.609, 69.984)]. Conclusion When combined with 0.2 μg/kg sufentanil, infusing 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam benzenesulfonate for 1 min is effective and safe for laryngeal mask anesthesia induction in elderly patients.