Objective To systematically review current status of Chinese DRIs, and compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and global DRIs, so as to provide references for regulating Chinese DRIs. Methods Such database as PubMed, ISI Web of knowledge, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP were electronically searched from inception to May 31st, 2013. The reviewers independently screened studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data. Then, descriptive analysis was performed for basic information of literature, formulation of different DRIs, and DRIs distribution by different ages. Results Initially, a total of 588 articles were retrieved, 42 of which were finally included, involving 14 guidelines, 12 systematic reviews (SRs), and 16 original studies. The results showed that, WHO guidelines and global systematic reviews focused on iron and fat-soluble vitamins (A and D); the original studies in China focused not only on iron and vitamin A but also on protein, calcium, zinc, and selenium. The included guidelines focused mainly on population aged 3-18 years old and pregnant women; and except for those two kinds of population, SRs also paid attention to adults aged more than 18 years. The original studies of Chinese DRIs were concerned about all kinds of population, mainly focused adults aged 18-45 years and school children aged 6-12 years. Among 16 included original studies, 4 were concerned about men and 2 about women. Conclusion Chinese DRIs need urgent updates and supplement. As the largest developing country, China has different disease burdens, consumption levels, dietary patterns, nutrients’ content, and security levels, compared with developed countries and other developing countries. To develop evidence-based Chinese DRIs that are suitable for native health and Chinese local conditions, we should drawing lessons from the currently available best DRIs standards, methods and evidence based on Chinese actual conditions, disease burden, and expert opinion.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of combination of motherwort injection and oxytocin for promoting the involution of uterus. MethodsData of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of motherwort injection and oxytocin in promoting the effect of postpartum involution of uterus were collected by searching the electronic databases including PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, CENTRAL and WHO ICTRP from inception to August 26th, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literatures according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 18 RCTs involving 6 468 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:Compared with the oxytocin alone group, the combination group of motherwort injection and oxytocin was higher on promoting the drop height of uterus (MD=1.33, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.63), lower on the height of uterus (MD=-2.12, 95%CI -2.64 to -1.61) and duration of lochia (MD=-7.11, 95%CI -8.84 to -5.38). There was no statistical difference in adverse effect rate between the two groups (OR=0.87, 95%CI 0.64 to 1.19, P=0.38). ConclusionsMotherwort injection combined with oxytocin is superior to oxytocin alone in promoting the drop height of postpartum uterus and shortening the duration of lochia. Because of the low quality of the included studies, more high quality RCTs are needed to prove the above conclusion.
Strengthening the management and evaluation of clinical pathways is one of the most important strategies of "Healthy China 2030" Strategic Plan. Evidence-based assessment and clinical guidelines can provide the best relevant evidence to develop clinical pathways. We planned to analyze the current situation of clinical pathways in China and explore how to apply evidence-based assessment on clinical pathway management. We searched PubMed, EMbase, ISI, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and the The Cochrane Library using "critical pathways" and "clinical guidelines" as key words or subject terms. And we conducted a comparison of their published volume, definitions, differences and connections. The management system of clinical pathway in China is fundamentally flawed, it is still a challenge to implement the clinical pathways effectively without scientific methodologies and standardized evidence-based evaluation system. In order to improve the management quality of clinical pathway in China, we should develop clinical pathways based on national situation and innovate the evaluation system to standardize the clinical pathway management according to WHO recommendations of clinical guideline and appraisal.
The primary principle of evidence-based medicine is that the best clinical decision-making is derived from clinical problems with combination of patient’s preferences with clinical experience and the best evidence. Evidence-based medicine by its nature, is a specific application on the evaluation of medical hypothesis. It also emphasize the importance of humanism in clinical practice. Our study explored the scientific and humanistic characteristics of evidence-based medicine from the prospective of philosophy, so as to facilitate the extensive application of evidence based practice paradigm in other fields.
The majority of problems are comprehensive and complex in the modern society, which leads to the increasing contradictions in the specialization and comprehensiveness of knowledge. Interdisciplinary cooperation is one approach to improve the effectiveness and transferability. The primary principle of evidence-based medicine is its scientific and transparent procedures. It combines the patient’s preferences with clinical experience and the best evidence. Meanwhile, evidence-based medicine is focused on how to transfer research outcomes into practice and the re-evaluation of the result of practice in order to striving for perfections. Combining this practical pattern of evidence-based medicine with other disciplines can have a significant improvement on scientific methods and thinking patterns, and become an effective way to improve the quality of scientific research and promote the transformation.
The social needs, disciplinary development and humanistic reflection has promoted the emergence and development of evidence-based medicine. Moreover, evidence-based medicine-problems oriented research, evidence based decision, transferring results to practice and outcome evaluation-continues to meet society demands, promote the development of discipline and show humanist concern. The application of evidence-based medicine has gradually extended from the field of clinical medicine to the public health, society, management, economy, policy research and education in the process of solving various problems. The high quality evidence has also been important to decision-making in these fields. Our study explored the emergence and development of evidence-based medicine from the perspective of social needs, disciplinary development and humanistic reflection for the first time.
The increasing deteriorative trend of doctor-patient relationship (DPR) have destroyed patient safety, doctor safety and social stability in China. DPR is a complicated social problem related to multidisciplinary and multi-factor interactions. A series of researches providing different views on how to improve DPR in China have been published in recently years. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) aims to deal with massive information by producing, synthesizing and disseminating evidence from complex interventions. We tried to explore the trait of DPR by EBM methods. We provided evidence on research trends, topics and methods by systematic database retrieval, classification by screening, and quality assessment. Through dissection, attribution, and visualization of interactions and relationships between factors, we provided an evidence-supported framework for improvement of DPR. We identified gaps, defects or deficiencies in existing research, and promoted further research. We continued to follow up the research and faced a challenge: Reflection and frustration in the process of establishing the quality evaluation system of qualitative research. We found that the study of complex humanities and social sciences by reference to evidence-based methodology might be: providing a structured, panoramic perspective for complex social problems on " de-fragmentation”, providing a framework for social governance through classification and hierarchy, and calling for a more tolerant attitude and more comprehensive application of methodologies.