Objective To compare the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone(IVTA) injection and IVTA combined with macular laser grid photocoagulation（MLGP）to treat macular edema.Methods Consecutive 89 patients （109 eyes）diagnosed with macular edema by examinations of ocular fundus and optical coherence tomography (OCT).The visual acuity was hand moving-0.8 (0.19plusmn;0.13)；the intraocular pressure（IOP）ranged from 7 mm Hg to 21 mm Hg（1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa）and the average IOP was 13.78 mm Hg.All the patients received OCT and microperimetry examinations，the central macular thickness was （570plusmn;182）mu;m；the average light sensitivity was （5.07plusmn;3.94） dB and the fixation percentage was 70.67% within 4 deg;area around the macular fovea. All the patients received IVTA treatment，39 patients（48 eyes）further received MLGP 1 month later (IVTAMLGP group). The remaining 50 patients (61 eyes) without MLGP treatment was the IVTA group. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),IOP,lens,OCT and microprimetry examinations before and after IVTA (1,3,6,12 months) were followed and analyzed.Results On the 12th months，the BCVA in IVTAMLGP and IVTA group was （0.41plusmn;0.20）、（0.24plusmn;0.19）respectively (P＜0.05)；the central macular thickness was （309plusmn;187） and （487plusmn;206） mu;m respectively（P＜0.05）；the mean light sensitivity of 4deg; central macular was （8.24plusmn;4.64）and（6.30plusmn;3.22）dB respectively（P＜0.05）；the fixation percentage was（87.01plusmn;19.70）% and（78.85plusmn;20.41）% respectively （P＜0.05）. During the followup recurrent macular edema was noticed in 28 eyes of IVTA group and 8 eyes of IVTAMLGP group.Conclusions IVTA combined with MLG was more effective than IVTA to cure macular edema.
Objective To evaluate the long-term result of vitrectomy for macular epiretinal membranes(ERM) and the relationship between bestcorrected visual acuity(VA) and macular thickness. Methods In a retrospective consecutive series, twenty-two eyes(17eyes of idiopathic（77％） and 5 of secondary ERM（23％）) of 2 2 patients with macular ERM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and membrane peeling which had more than 1 yearprime;s (12.40 months，mean(23plusmn;8)months)follow up were included. All the patients were examined by VA, fundus color photography, fluo rescein fundus angiography (FFA) optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after treatment. VA was adopted 5 points record; FFA and OCT were underway as common way. The mean of VA was (4.25plusmn;0.36), the mean of macular thickness was (4.99 plusmn;114) mu;m. Compared the VA, appearance of fundus photography, fluorescein angio graphy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after surgery. Results Visual improvement was achieved in 13 eyes (59%), meanwhile, 6 eyes (27%) were s table and 3 eyes (14%) were worse; VA of 15 eyes (66%) was more than 4.5 at last follow-up. The mean VA increased from (4.25plusmn;0.36) to (457plusmn;031) postope rative ly, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Mean macular thi cknes s decreased from (499plusmn;114) mu;m (317-774 mu;m) to (286plusmn;104) mu;m (150-597 mu;m) (P＜0.05) postoperatively, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05), but still different to the opposite eyesprime;((184plusmn;37) mu;m)(P＜0.05).VA correlated with macular thickness preoperatively (r=-0.64,P=0.001)and postoperat ively(r=-0.58, P=0.01) except the patients with cataract improvement without therapy. 6 eyes(27%) had retinal hemorrhage and 2 eyes(9%) had peripheral retinal breaks intraoperati vely; 5 eyes(23%) had secondary higher intraocular pressure, 1 eye(5%) had macul a hole and 8 eyes(36%) had cataract improvement postoperatively. Conclusions Surgery is successful in treating ERM. It can relieve macular edema and improve visual acuity. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2008，24：206-209）
Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of radial optic neurotomy (RON) for ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with macular edema. Methods The clinical data of 6 patients with ischemic CRVO combined with macular edema who had been treated with vitrectomy and radial optic neurotomy were retrospectively analyzed. The pre- and post-operative visual acuity, results of fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optic coherence tomography (OCT), including the macular thickness, fluorescein filling in retinal veins, retinal hemorrhages and papilloedema were analyzed and compared. Results In the 6 patients, the visual acuity increased in different degrees and retinal hemorrhages decreased evidently. Macular edema was alleviative in 5 patients, retinal vein dilatation meliorated in 4, and papilloedema disappeared in 2. Conclusion RON may alleviate macular edema in patients with ischemic CRVO, but the relation of the therapeutic effect and vitrectomy can not be eliminated. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:3-5)
ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of peeling of internal limiting membrane (ILM) on the postoperative visual acuity in patients with diabetic macular edema, and to detect the role indocyanine green (ICG) plays in the surgery of peeling of ILM. MethodsThirty patients (31 eyes) with diabetic retinopathy at proliferative stage with macular edema underwent vitrectomy. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: 16 eyes in group A underwent single vitrectomy with panretinal photocoagulation and ocular filling with 20% SF6; 15 eyes in group B underwent vitrectomy and peeling of ILM after the posterior pole was stained with ICG. All of the patients were asked to keep the posture of facing down for 10-14 days. The follow-up lasted 3-12 months.ResultsIn 16 eyes in group A, the visual acuity increase of 2 or more lines in 10 (62.5%) and alleviation of macular edema in 9 (56.2%) were found; the postoperative average macular retinal thickness examined by optic coherence tomography (OCT) was 393 μm. In 15 eyes in group B, the visual acuity increase of 2 or more lines in 14 (93.3%) and alleviation of macular edema in 14 (93.3%) were found; the postoperative average macular retinal thickness was 319 μm. The postoperative improvement of visual acuity in group B was much better than that in group A (X2=4.210, P=0.05), while the postoperative macular retinal thickness in group B was obviously lower than that in group A (P＜0.01). The operative sample was proved to be the ILM. ConclusionsVitrectomy is effective for diabetic macular edema and the curative effect may be improved by peeling of ILM; ICG can dye ILM well, which ensures the safe and accurate peeling of ILM.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:138-141)
Objective To verify the effects of the treatment of krypton yellow laser for diabetic macular edema.Methods A total of 430 eyes in 251 cases of diabetic focal macular edema, diffuse edema and cystoid edema were treated with krypton yellow laser photocoagulation. Those with focal macular edema underwent the focal photocoagulation, and those with diffuse edema and cystoid edema underwent the grid photocoagulation.The visual acuity examination, fundus fluoresec in angiography and colour photography of the fundus were performed before and every 3 or 4 months after the treatment.The changes of macular edema after the treatment were analysed.The follow-up duration was 3 to 23 months (with an average of 15.5 months). Results After laser focal photocoagulation in 186 eyes with focal macular edema, visual acuity was improved or maintained in 183 eyes (98.39% ). Edema disappeared completely or partially in 184 eyes (98.93%). After laser grid photocoagulation in 175 eyes with diffuse macular edema, visual acuity was improved or maintained in 163 eyes (93.14%). Edema disappeared completely or partially in 164 eyes (93.71%). After laser grid photocoagulation in 69 eyes with cystoid macular edema, visual acuity was improved or maintained in 59 eyes (85.5% ). Edema disappeared completely or partially in 64 eyes (92.75%).Conclusion The linchpin of the treatment of krypton yellow laser for diabetic macular edema lies in the insurance of the effective laser macules and the adaptability of selecting the proper parameter of laser according to the degree and scope of the macular edema and the visual acuity. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：14-17)