Objective To investigate the feasibility and clinical significance of monitoring diabetic macular edema by Heidelberg retina tomograph Ⅱ (HRT). Methods The diabetic macular edema (DME) was diagnosed by slit-lamp microscopy combined with three-mirror contact lens examination and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA). The exponential of macular edema (e value) of healthy people and patients with DME or without DME (NDME) (the total number is 77 individuals and 120 eyes) were detected by HRT Ⅱ. All of the 77 people were divided into three groups. In DME group, there were 23 patients (40 eyes), including 13 males (23 eyes) and 10 females (17 eyes), at the age of 44-68 (average of 55.17plusmn;8.26). In NDME group, there were 32 patients (40 eyes), including 18 males (22 eyes) and 14 females (18 eyes), at the age of 44-68 (average of 55.17plusmn;6.5). In normal control group, there were 22 patients (40 eyes), including 10 males (19 eyes) and 12 females (21 eyes), at the age of 42-65 (average of 53.32plusmn;6.04). According to the results of FFA, the 40 eyes in DME group were divided into: grade 1 of FFA in 9 eyes, with macular suspicious leakage or the area of leakage of lt;25%; grade 2 of FFA in 10 eyes, with the area of leakage between 25% and 66%; grade 3 of FFA in 21 eyes, with the area of leakage of gt;66%. The differences of sex and age among the 3 groups were not significant (Pgt;0.05). The relationship among e value, leakage area, and visual acuity was observed. Results There was a significant difference of e value (the macular diameter was 1, 2, and 3 mm) among the 3 groups(Plt;0.05). The e value in normal control group didnrsquo;t differ much from which in NDME group (Pgt;0.05), but was statistically different from which in DME group (Plt;0.05). Significant difference of e value was also found between NDME group and DME group (Plt;0.05). There was a correlation between visual acuity and e value in DME group (Plt;0.05). In DME group, the difference of e value among FFA grade 1, 2, and 3 groups was found according to the variance analysis; the macular leakage area in FFA grade 3 group differed much from which in grade 1 (Plt;0.05) and grade 2 group (Plt;0.05), while no significant difference was found between grade 1 and grade 2 group. The result was not correlated with the macular diameter. Conclusion E value in the macular module of HRT Ⅱ can detect and evaluate the degree of DME. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2007,23:252-255)
Objective To explore the frequency, clinical features, and characteristics of results of fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) of uveitis related cystoid macular edema (CME). Methods The clinical data and FFA results of 67 patients (106 eyes) with posterior uveitis examined in our hospital from July 2002 to June 2005 were collected. The clinical features and characteristics of FFA images of CME were observed and analyzed. Results Among the106 eyes of 67 patients with uveitis,the CME was observed in 28 eyes (26.4%) of 18 patients, including 7 males and 11 females with the average age of (42.5plusmn;10.8) years. The dark area due to the choroidal fluorescence blocked by the macular edema was found at the early FFA phase, and th en followed by the punctate and sheetlike leakage of fluorescein; the capillar y was dilated at the venous phase, and the typical petaloid appearance was seen at the late phase because the fluorescein cumulated in several small vesicles in the macular area. After treated by corticosteroids and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, the extent of CME diminished, and the visual acuity improved in varying degrees. Conclusi ons Uveitis may seriously harm the visual function, in which CME induces the damage of visual acuity. Early detection and timely treatment may prevent thepermanent visual damage. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2006, 22: 394-396)
ObjectiveTo probe the classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the different grade of diabetic and type of macular edema according to fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA). MethodsFFA was performed on 1 058 patients (2 097 eyes) to classify DR and macular edema with the analysis of duration of DM, visual acuity, manifestation of FFA images and results of ophthalmoscopic examination.ResultsIn 2 097 eyes, there were 124 (5.9%) without DR, 396 (18.9%) with DR I, 430 (20.5%) with DR II, 563 (26.8%) with DR III, 262 (125%) with preproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PPDR), 254 (12.%) with DR IV, 60 (2.9%) with DR V, and 8 (0.4%) with DR VI. In 2 097 eyes there were 819 (39.1%) with macular edema, including 311 (38%) with focal macular edema, 322 (39.3%) with diffused macular edema, 112 (13.7%) with cystoid macular edema, 25 (3.1%) with ischemia macular edema, and 49 (6.0%) with proliferative macular edema.ConclusionWith the analysis of the results of FFA of 2 097 eyes, we classify DR in stage Ⅰ (primary stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ), Ⅱ (primary stage Ⅲ), Ⅲ (preproliferative diabetic retinopathy), Ⅳ,Ⅴ, and Ⅵ; classify macular edema of DR in focal, diffused, cystoid, ischemic, and proliferating ones.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2003,19:333-337)