ObjectiveTo introduce the role of three dementional computed tomograph (3D-CT) for patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure in perioperative evaluation. MethodsFrom April 2014 to June 2015, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 28 patients with severe aortic stenosis underwent successful TAVI procedure using new second-generation device, who were enrolled in this study including 12 males and 16 females at mean age of 72.8±4.5 years. We used 3D-CT to get the perioperative relative evaluation, including valve morphology and calcification degree, annular diameter, aoronary ostium height, ascending aorta, aortic sinus diameter, left ventricular-aortic angle, optimal intraoperative angiogram projection angle. Based on the evaluation by 3D-CT image, the prosthesis size, balloon size, best intraoperative imaging projection angle and approach of apex were then chosen. ResultsAll patients with severe aortic stenosis underwent successful TAVI procedure with mean logistic Euro-SCORE I:26.2%±7.9%. CT image revealed that mean aortic annular diameter was 24.6±1.8 mm with mean valve prosthesis size 25.8±1.1 mm and pre-dilation balloon size 23.1±1.2 mm and 76.8% patients were of tricuspid aortic valve with severe calcification and 25% patients were of asymmetric calcification. Optimal intraoperative angiogram image was achieved in 92.9% patients with the help of preoperative CT image. There was a statistic difference in mean transvalvular gradient after valve implantation (54.1±15.3 mm Hg vs. 13.1±8.5 mm Hg, P<0.05). And there was no mortality or severe complication postoperatively. Conclusion3D-CT image palys an important role during perioperative evaluation of TAVI procedure and it can be helpful for Chinese doctors to operate TAVI successfully.
【摘要】 目的 了解外科围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物现状,评估其用药合理性。 方法 随机抽取2009年1-12月265例外科手术患者病历,根据《抗菌药物临床应用指导原则》和《卫生部办公厅关于抗菌药物临床应用管理有关问题的通知》对抗菌药物使用进行合理性评价。 结果 265例外科手术患者均使用了抗菌药物,使用率为100%,外科围手术期预防用抗菌药物不合理率为63.89%,存在的主要问题是用药指征过宽、起点过高、手术前预防用药时间不当、术后预防用药时间过长及盲目联合用药。 结论 外科围手术期抗菌药物预防性使用不合理现象突出,应积极开展合理使用抗菌药物培训,加强抗菌药物使用管理,规范围手术期抗菌药物的使用,从而提高外科围手术期抗菌药物使用合理性。【Abstract】 Objective To know the status of prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents in perioperative patients, and to evaluate the medication rationality. Methods The medical records of 265 patients who underwent the surgeries from January to December 2009 were randomly extracted, and the medication rationality was evaluated according to "Guiding Principles of Clinical Use of Antibiotics" and "Notice of Medical Department Office about Antibiotics Clinical practice Management Related Questions". Results All of the 265 perioperative patients were treated with antimicrobial drugs with a utilization rate of 100.00%, and the unreasonable rate of perioperative prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents was 63.89%. The main reasons included over-extended medication indications, high starting points, inappropriate time points of prophylactic medication, long duration of prophylactic medication and unreasonable drug combination. Conclusion The perioperative prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents is clinically unreasonable. It is necessary to carry out training on the rational use of antimicrobial agents to enhance the management of antimicrobial drug use and regulate the use of antimicrobial agents in perioperation.
【摘要】 目的 了解围手术期预防性应用抗菌药物的现状并评价其合理性。 方法 采用回顾性调查的方法,随机抽查2009年1-12月500例Ⅰ类切口围手术期患者资料,填写设计的《外科围手术期预防性应用抗菌药物调查表》,对预防用药的适应证、用药种类、联合用药、给药时机及持续时间进行统计分析。 结果 500例中,未使用抗菌药物5例,预防性使用抗菌药物495例,不合理或欠合理80例(16.00%)。预防性使用抗菌药物总例次为540,其中头孢菌素类453例次(83.89%),青霉素类(包括酶抑制剂)26例次(4.81%),喹诺酮类44例次(8.15%),林可酰胺类17例次(3.15%)。头孢唑啉钠使用178例次(32.96%)居第1位,头孢替唑钠使用151例次(27.96%)。 结论 Ⅰ类切口手术围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物较为合理,但仍存在用药指征把握不严,抗菌药物的选择、使用时间较长等问题,有待进一步规范化管理。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the prophylactic application of antibiotics during the perioperative period of type I incisions. Methods The clinical data of 500 patients with type I incisions from January to December of 2009 were retrospectively analyzed by self-designed questionnaire survey. The indication of antibiotics usage, choice of antibiotics categories, combination of antibiotics,giving time and length of antibiotics usage were analyzed. Results In 500 patients, only 5 were not given antibiotics, 80 (16%) were given antibiotics unnecessarily. In 540 patients who had underwent the antibiotic administration, 453 (16%) were administrated with cephalosporins, 44 (8.15%) were with fluoroquinolones, 26 (4.81%) were with penicillins, and 17 (3.15%) were with lincomycins. Cefazolin, the most used antibiotics, was given in 178 patients (32.96%)。Ceftezole was given in 151 patients (27.96%). Conclusion The prophylactic application of antibiotics during the perioperative period of type I incisions is basically rational, however, there were also some problems, such as using antibiotics unnecessary, mischoice of antibiotics and using antibiotics too long. Thus, we need management of prophylactic antibiotics usage.
目的:了解成都地区抗菌药物的使用现状,分析围手术期抗感染用药情况,并作出客观评价。方法:根据《抗菌药物临床应用基本原则》,回顾性分析2004年12月至2006年12月成都地区8家医院1268份围手术期病历。结果:围手术期患者使用抗菌药物用于预防术后感染的时间超过了抗菌药物临床应用指导原则规定的比例占91.40%,联合用药的比例占总病历数的53.56%,7.81%的患者在手术过程中应用去甲万古霉素、庆大霉素等冲洗伤口以预防感染。结论:围手术期抗菌药物的使用基本合理,但是存在频繁且长时间应用的问题,应当加强抗菌药物应用的管理。