west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "多节段颈椎病" 2 results
  • 颈前路选择性椎体次全切除联合椎间盘切除减压治疗多节段颈椎病

    目的 总结颈前路选择性椎体次全切除联合椎间盘切除减压治疗多节段颈椎病的手术方法及临床效果。 方法 2005 年1 月- 2008 年1 月,收治34 例多节段颈椎病患者。男22 例,女 12 例;年龄 42 ~ 77 岁,平均 56.9 岁。病程2 h ~ 8 年,平均2 年8 个月。颈椎X 线片及MRI 检查显示为2 个节段以上椎间平面病变,其中C2 ~ 4 2 例,C3 ~ 5 18例,C4 ~ 6 11 例,C5 ~ 7 3 例。脊髓型颈椎病22 例,混合型12 例。选择压迫最严重的节段行椎体次全切除,相对次要节段行椎间盘切除,自体髂骨植骨融合钢板内固定术。 结果 术后均未出现呼吸困难、声嘶、饮水呛咳及进食困难,切口Ⅰ期愈合。34 例均获随访,随访时间18 ~ 24 个月,平均18.4 个月。术后3 ~ 4 个月植骨融合。术后颈椎恢复正常生理曲度,受压节段脊髓膨隆良好。根据日本骨科协会(JOA)颈椎脊髓功能评分法,术前为(11.23 ± 0.65)分,术后6 个月为(13.89 ±0.38)分,差异有统计学意义(P lt; 0.05);改善率获优12 例,良18 例,可4 例,优良率88.2%。 结论 颈前路选择性椎体次全切除联合椎间盘切除减压术能达到颈椎前方充分减压,有效改善颈椎生理曲度,增加颈前路融合率,促进神经功能恢复,减少并发症发生。

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO OPERATIVE WAYS IN TREATING MULTI-LEVEL CERVICAL DEGENERATIVE DISEASE

    ObjectiveTo assesse the effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone in treating multi-level cervical degenerative disease. MethodsBetween August 2010 and August 2012, 62 eligible patients with multi-level cervical degenerative disease were treated, and the clinical data were reviewed. Of 62 patients, 32 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone (group A), and 30 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation (group B). Both groups showed no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, lesion types, and affected segments (P>0.05), it had comparability. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score; the fused segment height, subsidence rates of Cages, global cervical lordosis, and fusion rates were also compared. ResultsThe operation time of group B[(109.7±11.2) minutes] was significantly more than group A[(87.8±6.9) minutes] (t=-2.259, P=0.037). Primary healing of incisions was obtained in all patients of 2 groups. All patients were followed up; the follow-up period ranged from 8 to 27 months (mean, 15.8 months) in group A, and from 9 to 28 months (mean, 16.4 months) in group B. There was no complication and internal fixation failure. The JOA score and VAS score were significantly improved at last follow-up when compared with preoperative scores in 2 groups (P<0.05). According to Robinson standard for axial symptom severity, the results were excellent in 20 cases, good in 9, fair in 2, and poor in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 90.63% in group A; the results were excellent in 19 cases, good in 7, fair in 3, and poor in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 86.67% in group B; and no significant difference was found between 2 groups (χ2=0.765, P=0.382). The fused segment height at immediate after operation and at last follow-up and global cervical lordosis at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between groups A and B in the Cage subsidence height[(1.4±0.9) mm vs. (1.2±1.6) mm], Cage subsidence rate[9.52% (8/84) vs. 7.59% (6/79)], and fusion rate[95.24% (80/84) vs. 96.20% (76/79)]. ConclusionAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone can obtain good clinical results and radiologic indexes, avoid plate-related complications and reduce operation time. It is a safe and effective surgical option in the treatment of multi-level cervical degenerative disease.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content