目的探讨大隐静脉腔内激光+膝下经皮点状贯穿缝扎治疗大隐静脉曲张的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2004年1月至2010年12月期间389例大隐静脉曲张患者采用腔内激光+膝下经皮点状贯穿缝扎术治疗的临床资料。结果手术全部成功完成，平均手术时间50 min。住院4～8 d，平均住院6 d。本组患者均获随访，随访时间为 1～36个月（平均18个月），所有患者均无深静脉血栓、深静脉损伤等手术并发症发生，无一例复发。迂曲、成团曲张静脉消失,溃疡愈合，色素沉着减轻或消失，下肢肿胀沉重感、酸困感消失。术后1个月彩超复查大隐静脉主干均全程闭塞，无血流信号，曲张的静脉均消失，膝下小腿部皮肤无条索状硬结及瘢痕。结论大隐静脉腔内激光结合膝下经皮点状贯穿缝扎术，使微创治疗大隐静脉曲张更加完善。
ObjectiveThis study is designed to explore the indications, clinical pathway, and benefits of ultrasound-guided local anesthesia in radiofrequency endovenous obliteration (RFO) for great saphenous vein varices (GSV).MethodsA total of 350 patients diagnosed with GSV were divide into observation group (n=175) and control group (n=175). Patients in the observation group underwent local anesthesia RFO, and patients in the control group underwent intravertebral anesthesia. Comparion in the visual analogue scale pain scores (VAS) when anesthesia and after surgery, operative indexes, recovery time, satisfaction, and complications were performed.ResultsCompared with the control group, the VAS score with anesthesia time were lower (P<0.05), while in the surgery were higher (P<0.05), as well as the operative time, the first time for underground activity, normal activity time, incidences of complication of anesthesia and urinary were shorter (P<0.05), and the satisfaction rate was higher (P<0.05). There was no difference in the pain score of 12 h and 24 h after surgery, blood loss, volume of anesthetic swelling fluid, postoperative hospitalization, incidences of urinary tract infection, incisional infection, and deep vein thrombosis (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe RFO is feasible and safe after local anaesthesia. It can decrease the complication of anesthesia, that will promote the patient soon to be restored to health.
目的 研究地佐辛＋咪达唑仑在大隐静脉射频闭合术中的镇静作用，并观察其对生命体征的影响以及不良反应的发生情况。方法 选取60例行大隐静脉射频闭合术患者，根据麻醉方式分为芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组和地佐辛＋咪达唑仑组２组，每组30例。分别监测心率（HR）、动脉血氧饱和度（SpO2）、平均动脉压（MAP），记录用药后5min和30min的镇静评分、生命体征以及术中不良反应的发生情况。结果 给药后5min和30min的镇静效果评分芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组分别为（2.95±0.14）分和（4.09±0.05）分，地佐辛＋咪达唑仑组分别为（3.16±0.09）分和（4.08±0.08）分，2组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。2组给药后5min和30min的HR、SpO2及MAP比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；与给药前（0min）比较，差异也无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。2组患者镇静良好，无躁动，均无一例发生呼吸抑制，仅芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组有4例发生呛咳。结论 芬太尼和地佐辛联合咪达唑仑用于大隐静脉射频消融手术患者，镇静效果良好，对生命体征影响小，但地佐辛组无呛咳，不良反应发生率更低。
Objective To compare the effect of high ligation and spot stripping (HLSS) and high ligation and foam sclerotherapy (HLFS) in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins (GSVV). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 385 patients with GSVV who received HLFS or HLSS treatment at Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022. The differences in surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, complications, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups were compared. Results The surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, visual analog scale for pain, incidence of postoperative hematoma, skin sensory disorders, and infection in the HLFS group were less or lower than those in the HLSS group (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with preoperative indicators at the same group, the modified venous clinical severity score (VCSS) decreased and the chronic lower limb venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score increased (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of improvement in VCSS and CIVIQ between the two groups at three months after surgery and before surgery (P>0.05). Conclusions HLFS has a definite therapeutic effect on GSVV, with smaller trauma, faster recovery after surgery, and lower incidence of postoperative complication compared to HLSS. It can be used as a surgical option for GSVV patients in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins in ambulatory surgery.MethodsPatients who underwent radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins between May 2018 and June 2019 in General Hospital of Northen Theater Command were prospectively selected. According to their choices of treatment modes, patients were divided into two groups, day surgery group and routine inpatient group. The preoperative waiting time, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses of the two groups were compared. The postoperative pain, tenderness, and complications were followed up on the first day (the next day after operation), the third day, and the fourteenth day after operation, and the time of return to normal life and work and patients’ satisfaction in two groups were recorded.ResultsA total of 95 patients were enrolled, including 52 in the day surgery group and 43 in the routine inpatient group. There was no significantly difference in age, gender, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, or operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine inpatient group, the day surgery group had shorter preoperative waiting time, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower hospitalization expenses (P<0.05). In the day surgery group, the time of return to normal life and the time of return to work were shorter and patients’ satisfaction was significantly higher than those in the routine inpatient group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pain, tenderness, or paresthesia scores between the two groups after surgery according to the follow-up assessment (P>0.05); the pain, tenderness, and paresthesia scores on the first day and the third day were significantly different from those on the fourteenth day after surgery, indicating that the longer the postoperative time of the two groups, the less pain, tenderness, and paresthesia scores were.ConclusionRadiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins in ambulatory surgery has a short hospital stay, low medical cost, high patient satisfaction, and can ensure the safety of treatment at the same time, which is worthy of clinical promotion
ObjectiveTo identify the core genes involved in the great saphenous varicose veins (GSVVs) through bioinformatics method. MethodsThe transcriptional data of GSVVs and normal great saphenous vein tissues (control tissues) were downloaded from the gene expression omnibus database. The single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to calculate the Hallmark score. The weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) combined with machine learning algorithms was used to screen the key genes relevant GSVVs. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was performed using the String database, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to reflect the discrimination ability of the target genes for GSVVs. ResultsCompared with the control tissues, there were 548 up-regulated genes and 706 down-regulated genes in the GSVVs tissues, the Hallmark points of KRAS signaling and apical junction were down-regulated, while which of peroxisomes, coagulation, reactive oxygen species pathways, etc. were up-regulated in the GSVVs tissues. A total of 639 differentially expressed genes relevant GSVVs were obtained and 165 interaction relations between proteins encoded by 372 genes, and the top 10 genes with the highest betweeness values, ADAM10, APP, NCBP2, SP1, ASB6, ADCY4, HP, UBE2C, QSOX1, and CXCL1, were located at the center of the interaction relation. And the core genes were mainly related to copper ion homeostasis, neutrophil degranulation G protein coupled receptor signaling, response to oxidative stress, and regulation of amide metabolism processes. The SP1 and QSOX1 were both Hub genes. The expressions of the SP1 and QSOX1 in the GSVVs tissues were significantly up-regulated as compared with the control tissues. The areas under the ROC curves of SP1 and QSOX1 in distinguishing GSVVs tissues from normal tissues were 0.972 and 1.000, respectively. ConclusionsSP1 and QSOX1 are core genes in the occurrence and development of GSVVs. Regulation of SP1 or QSOX1 gene is expected to achieve precise treatment of GSVVs.
Objective To explore the feasibility and the security of one-day stay ward in stripping surgery of saphenous vein varicosity. Methods Two hundred and eighty two patients treated in our hospital in 2011 were enrolled in this study， according to the operation mode， these patients were divided into 2 groups， ninety patients in one-day stay ward group and one hundred and ninety two patients in in-patient group. Their clinical features and medical operation indexs（included preoperative waiting time， duration of hospital stay， and medical cost）were retrospectively analyzed. Results There was no statistical differences on clinical features between the two groups. But compared with in-patient group， the preoperative waiting time， duration of hospital stay， and medical cost were shorter or lower in one-day stay ward group （P＜0.05）. Conclusions The one-day stay ward operation mode can decrease preoperative waiting time， duration of hospital stay and medical cost significantly， and it also can ensure the safety of clinical treatment. So it’s worthy in the clinical promotion.
OBJECTIVE: Retrospective clinical analysis of primary surgical operation in the treatment of lower limb accompanied by chronic leg ulcer were adopted in this study. METHODS: From September 1990 to June 1998, there were 31 males and 20 females, aged 68 years in average, the area of ulcer varied from 5 cm x 3 cm to 22 cm x 11 cm. The ligation and strip of saphenous vein, debridement and free skin flap grafting were finished in primary operation. RESULTS: The skin flaps were survived completely in 50 cases, only 1 case was necrosis partially and healed after changing dressing. Forty-two cases were followed up for 16 months to 9 years (66 months in average), the varicosis and ulcer were healed in 39 cases and only 3 relapsed in ulceration. CONCLUSION: Primary surgical operation in the treatment of varicosis of lower limb accompanied by chronic ulcer is practicable in clinic. The curative efficacy is satisfactory and the operative manipulation is simple.