目的 观察内镜下食管静脉曲张套扎术联合药物治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张出血的临床疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2007年2月－2010年8月56例确诊为肝硬化食管静脉曲张出血患者，随机分为联合治疗组和对照组，各28例。对照组行胃镜下套扎术联合生长抑素、泮托拉唑；联合治疗组行内镜下套扎术联合生长抑素、泮托拉唑、普萘洛尔等药物治疗。观察所有食管静脉曲张出血患者1、3、6、12、18个月后随访，两组近期再出血率、食管曲张静脉消失率及复发率、不良反应及并发症的情况。 结果 联合治疗组曲张静脉消失率、不良反应及并发症与对照组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；联合治疗组近期再出血及食管静脉曲张复发等发生率明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 食管静脉曲张套扎术联合药物是治疗食管静脉曲张出血一种安全有效的方法，疗效确切，提高了患者生存率。
ObjectiveTo explore an individualized treatment program to prevent the initial bleeding of a patient with cirrhosis and esophageal varices by the methods of evidence-based medicine. MethodsOne patient with cirrhosis and esophageal varices was admitted into our hospital on November 2, 2013. After evaluating the patient's condition adequately, we proposed the problem according to the PICOS principles. Then, we assessed the clinical evidence from the Cochrane Library (1990-2012), Medline (1950-2012), Embase (1991-2012), VIP (1989-2013), and CBM (1990-2013). The individualized treatment plan was made through doctors' experiences and analysis of those high-quality evidences from the databases. ResultsEight studies (randomized controlled trials and 5 meta-analysis) were included. We evaluated a series of associated problems:whether we should take measurement to prevent initial bleeding of esophageal varices; which one (β-blockers or ligation of esophageal varices) was the best method to prevent the initial bleeding based on efficacy, complication and cost-effectiveness. Then, according to the evidences and the patient's view, we gave non-selectiveβ-blocker as the primary prevention. After one-year followed-up, the initial bleeding of the patient did not occur. ConclusionMaking the prevention plan for a patient with cirrhosis and esophageal varices can not only find out the individualized program, but also push the patient to make decision for their own health.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of automatic ligation of hemorrhoids (ALH) and procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids. MethodsOne hundred and eighty elderly patients with hemorrhoids who were admitted into the First People's Hospital of Jining City from January 2012 to December 2014 were enrolled. According to the operative mode, the patients were divided into ALH group and PPH group, with 90 cases in each group, received ALH and PPH treatment respectively. The postoperative pain, urinary retention, edema, bleeding, infection, anal swelling and anal stenosis were observed in the two groups, and two methods of operation were evaluated in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, healing time, hospitalization expenses and postoperative complications. ResultsThe VAS scores of the ALH group in the day 1-3 after operation were lower than that of the PPH group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the frequency of the use of analgesics in ALH group was less than that in PPH group (P < 0.01); the amount of blood loss and the healing time of the ALH group were significantly less or shoter than those of the PPH group (P < 0.01); the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the ALH group was 2.22% (2/90), which was significantly lower than that of the PPH group, 27.78% (25/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=23.050, P=0.000); the incidence of perianal edema after operation in the ALH group was 5.56% (5/90), which was significantly lower than that of PPH group of 15.56% (14/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.766, P=0.029). There was no obvious postoperative bleeding in the ALH group(0/90), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding in the PPH group was 7.78% (7/90), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P=0.007). The efficiency of ALH group was 98.89% (89/90) and the PPH group was 97.78% (88/90), the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=0.339, P=0.560). Conciusions There is no significant difference between ALH and PPH in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids, but ALH has the advantages of less pain, quicker recovery and fewer complications, it is worthy of popularization and application.
ObjectiveTo observe the therapeutic efficacy of ultrasonic scalpel flap-retentiong surgery combined with automatic hemorrhoid ligation for the treatment of four degree mixed hemorrhoids. MethodsThe patients with four degree mixed hemorrhoids admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2023 to June 2023 were included as the study subjects, then were randomly averagely divided into an observation group (underwent ultrasonic scalpel flap-retentiong surgery combined with automatic hemorrhoid ligation) and a control group (underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy) by a random number table method. The therapeutic efficacy, total hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, wound healing time, hospitalization costs, postoperative pain score, bleeding score, wound edema score, postoperative complications (anal stenosis, urinary retention, anal incontinence), and recurrence were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 100 patients with four degree mixed hemorrhoids treated in this hospital were included, with 50 patients in each group. There were no statistically significant differences in the general information such as the gender, age, disease course, body mass index, hematochezia, and tumor prolapse between the two groups (P>0.05). ① The overall therapeutic efficacy both the observation group and the control group was well (100% versus 96.0%, Fisher exact test, P=0.495). ② The observation group had less total hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization costs, and wound healing time as compared with the control group (P<0.05). ③ The differences in the interaction effects of the time-group for the points of postoperative pain, bleeding, and wound edema were not statistically significant (χ2=6.668, P=0.083; χ2=5.500, P=0.139; χ2=6.204, P=0.102). However, the main effects of group (χ2=5.073, P=0.024; χ2=7.107, P=0.008; χ2=8.857, P=0.003) and time (χ2=188.526, P<0.001; χ2=212.472, P<0.001; χ2=185.110, P<0.001) showed statistically significant differences. The points of postoperative pain, bleeding, and wound edema in the observation group were statistically lower than thoes in the control group (χ2=9.323, P=0.002; χ2=18.133, P<0.001; χ2=6.232, P=0.013). ④ The incidences of postoperative urinary retention and anal stenosis in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P=0.046 and 0.031, respectively), there were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of incontinence and postoperative recurrence between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFrom the preliminary research results of this study, ultrasonic scalpel flap-retentiong surgery in combination with automatic hemorrhoid ligation has a better efficacy in treating four degree mixed hemorrhoids, with a smaller wound, faster healing, higher safety, and fewer complications.