Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), more than 200 interventional clinical trials have been registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) and the US Clinical Trials Registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), testing or going to test treatments of COVID-19 in China from January 23rd, 2020 to March 5th, 2020. This situation has drawn attentions from various sectors of society. This article summarizes the basic design features of 249 registered COVID-19 clinical trials in China, compares them with National Clinical Trials Network practices in the USA, and describes a concept of national clinical trials network as a strategy to enhance quality and efficiency of clinical research in cases like COVID-19 outbreak as well as other disease fields.
Objective To know the current status of multinational clinical trials (MNCTs) in East Asia, and to find the characters of MNCTs in countries/regions. Methods We downloaded the trial records of East Asia on May 8, 2008 from ClinicalTrials.gov and analyzed the data. Results The number of clinical trials sponsored by industry was 125 in China Mainland, 196 in Taiwan, 134 in Hong Kong, 264 in Korea, and 231 in Japan, respectively. Of the total 654 clinical trials in East Asia, 307 (47%) trials were MNCTs, most of which were conducted by Euro-American pharmaceutical companies, such as Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Main therapeutic areas were cancer, followed by CNS diseases, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, diabetes mellitus and respiratory diseases. Trials in phaseⅢwere 198 (65%), in phaseⅣ32 (10%), others in phaseⅡorⅠ. One hundred and ninety trials (62%) were double-blind clinical trials, about half of them using placebo. The characters of clinical trials in China were: ① Most of MNCTs were large scale trials with big sample size and many study sites; ② Most of local trials were phase Ⅲ trials; ③ There were no phase Ⅰ trials. The characters in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Korea were: 1) Most of the trials (84% in Taiwan and 93% in Hong Kong, 72% in Korea) were MNCTs, 2) A lot of large scale trials were conducted with each other. The characters of clinical trials in Japan were: ① MNCTs were only 17%, ② Large scale trials were fewer. Conclusion In East Asia, MNCTs are developing because of the initiation of the Europe and America pharmaceutical giants. It seems that the regulation in each country influence the development pattern of East Asia.
ObjectiveTo explore the methods of data management and statistical analysis for longitudinal big data collected from mobile health management applications (APP). MethodsThe data management process and statistical analysis method were proposed by summarizing the characteristics of the data from mobile health management APPs. The methods would be clarified by a practical case: an APP recording female menstruation. ResultsThe data from health management APPs belong to longitudinal big data and the original record of the APP should be reprocessed or computed before conducting statistical analysis. A two-step data cleaning procedure was suggested for data management of the original records and reprocessed data, and longitudinal models such as mixed models was recommended for statistical analysis. ConclusionsThe data from health management APPs could be used for medical research via specific data management and statistical analysis after removing suspicious data. Cloud computing could be a viable method to improve efficiency of the big data analysis of health management APPs.
As a science which focuses on evidence, the decision making process of evidence medicine encounters an opportunity for development in the big data era. The starting point is shifting forward from evidence to data. The big data technology is playing an active role in evidence's collection, process and utilization. Evidence is more objective, righteous, authentic, transparent and easier to collect. Thus, to initiate evidence-based medicine research in the big data era and to structure an evidence-based medicine intelligent service platform, a full-scaled strategy should be developed in order to improve the quality of evidence. To promote the complete publicity of clinical research data, structuralized clinical data standard should be constructed. To provide a pathway to patients' follow-up data, portable and wearable monitoring devices should be popularized. To avoid risks from utilization of clinical research big data, regulations of clinical data usage should be implemented.
Real-world data (RWD) in clinical research on specific categories of medical devices can generate sufficient quality evidence which will be used in decision making. This paper discusses the limitations of traditional randomized controlled trials in clinical research of medical devices, summarizes and analyses the applicable conditions of real-world evidence (RWE) for medical devices, interprets the new FDA guidance document on the characteristics of RWD for medical devices, in order to provide evidence for the use of RWE in medical devices in our country.
With the encouragement of national policy on drug and medical device innovation, multi-center clinical trials and multi-regional clinical trials are facing an unprecedented opportunity in China. Trials with a multi-center design are far more common at present than before. However, it should be recognized there still exists shortcomings in current multi-center trials. In this paper, we summarize the problems and challenges and provide corresponding resolutions with the aim to reduce heterogeneity between study centers and avoid excessive center effects in treatment. It is urgent to develop design, implementation and reporting guidelines to improve the overall quality of multi-center clinical trials.
The concept of clinical trial transparency has been promoted for more than 40 years. The act of clinical trial registration, report guidelines development, and data sharing has has been strongly pushed forward and become a common practice. The clinical trial process being the key procedure of trial operation and quality control, determines the accuracy of the results. However, the process report of clinical trials is insufficient. In this article, we summarize the importance of clinical trial process report and provide corresponding suggestions. We propose that medical journals, reporting guidelines developers and clinical trial registration platforms should work together to strengthen the process report of clinical trials and promote full transparency of clinical trials.
Recently, real world studies (RWS) have received increasing attentions. Such studies typically involve patient information, and their results may have potentially significant impact on patient well-being and safety. When reviewing the protocol of real world studies, ethical issues should be carefully considered and assessed. This paper discussed three issues, including the overview of bioethics and its application to classic clinical trials, key features of RWS, and medical ethical considerations on RWS.
Data integrity, accuracy, and traceability are key elements of high-quality clinical research, as well as weak links in the promotion of clinical research transparency. How to promote data quality has become a major concern to all clinical research stakeholders. In this article, we dissected and analyzed data generation and capturing process in clinical research, and identified a key aspect in improving data quality: to promote electronic source data, especially to break the barrier between electronic health records and clinical research systems. Additionally, we summarized the experiences regarding this issue in China and overseas to propose a solution suitable for China to improve data quality in clinical research: to strengthen clinical research source data management by building clinical research source data platform and adopt common source data management process in hospitals.