ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass screw fixation and suboccipital decompression in the treatment of Arnold-Chiari malformation associated with atlantoaxial joint dislocation. MethodsBetween September 2012 and November 2015, 17 cases of Arnold-Chiari malformation associated with atlantoaxial dislocation were treated by the posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass screw fixation and suboccipital decompression and expansion to repair the dura mater and bone graft fusion. There were 10 males and 7 females, aged 35-65 years (mean, 51.4 years). The disease duration was 14 months to 15 years with an average of 7.4 years. According to Arnold-Chiari malformation classification, 13 cases were rated as type I, 3 cases as type II, and 1 case as type III-IV. Cervical nerve root stimulation and compression symptoms were observed in 12 cases, occipital foramen syndrome in 11 cases, cerebellar compression symptoms in 6 cases, and syringomyelia in 10 cases. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained in the other patients except 1 patient who had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage after removal of drainage tube at 3 days after operation, which was cured after 7 days. All patients were followed up 6 months to 2 years, with an average of 18.4 months. The neurological dysfunction was improved in different degrees after operation. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was significantly increased to 16.12±1.11 at 6 months from preoperative 11.76±2.01 (t=13.596, P=0.000); compression of spinal cord and medulla was improved. X-ray examination showed bone graft fusion at 6 months after operation. In 10 patients with spinal cord cavity, MRI showed empty disappearance in 3 cases, empty cavity lessening in 6 cases, and no obvious change in 1 case at 6 months. ConclusionAtlantoaxial lateral mass screw fixation and suboccipital decompression and expansion to repair the dura mater can obtain good effectiveness in the treatment of Arnold Chiari malformation associated with atlantoaxial transarticular dislocation.
Objective To explore the effectiveness of fixation of atlas translaminar screws in the treatment of atlatoaxial instability. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 32 patients with atlatoaxial instability treated with atlantoaxial trans-pedicle screws between March 2007 and August 2009. Of them, 7 patients underwent atlas translaminar screws combined with axis transpedicle screws fixation because of fracture types, anatomic variation, and intraoperative reason, including 5 males and 2 females with an average age of 48.2 years (range, 35-69 years). A total of 9 translaminar screws were inserted. Injury was caused by traffic accident in 4 cases, falling from height in 2 cases, and crushing in 1 case. Two cases had simple odontoid fracture (Anderson type II), and 5 cases had odontoid fracture combined with other injuries (massa lateralis atlantis fracture in 2, atlantoaxial dislocation in 1, and Hangman fracture in 2). The interval between injury and operation was 4-9 days (mean, 6 days). The preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was 8.29 ± 1.60. Results The X-ray films showed good position of the screws. Healing of incision by first intention was obtained, and no patient had injuries of the spinal cord injury, nerve root, and vertebral artery. Seven cases were followed up 9-26 months (mean, 14 months). Good bone fusion was observed at 8 months on average (range, 6-11 months). No loosening, displacement, and breakage of internal fixation, re-dislocation and instability of atlantoaxial joint, or penetrating of pedicle screw into the spinal canal and the spinal cord occurred. The JOA score was significantly improved to 15.29 ± 1.38 at 6 months after operation (t=32.078, P=0.000). Conclusion Atlas translaminar screws fixation has the advantages of firm fixation, simple operating techniques, and relative safety, so it may be a remedial measure of atlatoaxial instability．
To cure patients suffering from atlanto-axial instability following old fracture of odontoid process concomitant with stenosis of lower end of cervical spinal canal, a new operative method was designed. It included atlanto-axial fusion by Gallie technique and resection of right half of the laminae of C3-C7 spine at one stage. A female of 63 years old was treated. She was admitted with neck pain and numbness of the upper and lower limbs. A history of neck injury was noted in enquiry. In physical examination showed the sensation of pain of the upper limbs was decreased and the muscle power of the upper and lower limbs ranged from III degree to IV degree. The X-ray film and MRI suggested that there was instability of the atlanto-axial joint with stenosis of 4th-6th cervical spinal canal. The operation was satisfactory. After operation, the patient was followed up for 11 months. The physical examination indicated that sensation of the upper limbs had recovered to normal and the muscle power of the upper limbs reached IV degree and that the lower limbs reached V degree and X-ray showed bony fusion of the atlanto-axial joint. The conclusions were: 1. The stability of atlanto-axial joint was reconstructed with expanding of the spinal canal at the same time. 2. The duration, risk and cost of the therapy were reduced, and maintenance of the stability of the cervical spine throughout whole period of treatment was recommended.
目的:探讨后路寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉内固定的术前计划方案,明确其手术指导意义。方法:选取经CT评估寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉置入可行的,并拟选择该手术治疗的上颈椎不稳患者15例,容积再现重建(VR)寰枢椎椎弓表面影像,了解个体椎弓后方表面解剖形态与骨性解剖标志。同时按寰枢椎椎弓根理想的钉道走行,多平面重建(MPR)个体椎弓根断面影像。术前根据这些解剖影像设计手术暴露路经、理想的进钉点与钉道轨迹。术中按该术前计划手术暴露,找到理想的进钉点并钻孔置椎弓根螺钉。将术中观察到的C1后弓及C2椎弓表面解剖,与术前CT重建影像对比。术后CT复查,评价螺钉置入情况。结果:15例术中观察到的C1后弓及C2椎弓表面解剖特征与术前CT容积再现的影像一致。参照寰枢椎椎弓CT影像解剖制定术前计划方案,术中按其逐一操作,手术简单、直观,无重要血管神经损伤,置钉准确。结论:根据CT容积再现与多平面重建的寰枢椎解剖影像,制定后路寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉内固定术前计划方案,指导手术安全、可靠。
To study project of simpl icity and util ity for screw-plate system by pedicle of atlanto-axis mani pulatively hand by X-ray film and CT to prove the one success rate of putting screws. Methods Formulate personal program was used in operation by image save transmission of X-ray film and CT during January 2002 and September 2006 in 31 patients. There were 18 males and 13 femals, aged from 23 to 61 years old with an average age of 43.5 years. Putting screw points bypedicle of atlas were measured: left (19.93 ± 1.32) mm, right (19.16 ± 1.30) mm; putting screw obl iquity angle to inside by pedicle of atlas: left (23.72 ± 2.09)°, right (23.35 ± 1.91)°; putting screw obl iquity angle to side of head by pedicle of atlas: (9.00 ± 1.20)°. Screw points by pedicle of axis: left (13.14 ± 0.82) mm right (13.85 ± 0.79) mm; putting screw obl iquity angle to inside by pedicle of axis: left (24.52 ± 1.26)°, right (20.42 ± 1.42)°; putting screw obl iquity angle to side of head by pedicle of axis: (25.00 ± 3.00)°. The domestic location toward speculum was employed in operation and putting screw points and angles were formulated by X-CT program. The pedicle screws of suitable diameter and length were of exception and screws into pedicle of atlanto-axis were put by hand. Results Pain of the greater occipital nerve occurred in 2 patients after operation and was fully recovered by treatment 1 month after operation. The lateral cortical bone of pedicle was cut by 2 screws, but the spinal cord and vertebral artery were fine. The atlas and the fracture of odontoid process of axis were completely replaced in X-ray films of all patients 1 day after operation.The position relation of lag screw and vertebral artery or spinal cord was very good in CT sheets. All cases were followed up with an average of 10.5 months during 9 months to 5 years and 4 months, and obtained atlantoaxial arthrodesis. The breakage of screw and plate was not found in all cases. According to JOA score standard, 16 cases were excellent, 12 were good, 2 were fair, 1 was poor, and the excellent and good rate was 90.32% . Conclusion The personal design and cl inical appl ication of X-ray films and CT sheets are of great significance to screw-plate system by pedicle of atlanto-axis because of simpl ification of designs and methods and better personal ity.
Objective To investigate the cl inical results and complications of minimally invasive anterior transarticular screw fixation and fusion for atlantoaxial instabil ity. Methods Between May 2007 and December 2010, 13 patients with atlantoaxial instabil ity were treated with minimally invasive anterior transarticular screw fixation and fusion under endoscope. There were 11 males and 2 females, aged 17-61 years (mean, 41.3 years). The time between injury and operation was 5-14 days (mean, 7.4 days). All cases included 6 patients with Jefferson fracture, 5 with odontoid fracture, and 2 with os odontoideum. According to Frankel classification of nerve functions, 2 cases were rated as grade D and 11 cases as graed E. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, radiation exposure time, and complications were recorded and analyzed. The stabil ity was observed by X-ray films. The cl inical outcome was assessed using the Frankel scale, and the fusion rates were determined by CT scan threedimensional reconstruction at last follow-up. Results The mean operation time was 124 minutes (range, 95-156 minutes); the mean intra-operative blood loss was 65 mL (range, 30-105 mL); and the mean radiation exposure time was 41 seconds (range, 30-64 seconds). Thirteen patients were followed up 12-47 months (mean, 25.9 months). No blood vessel and nerve injuries or internal fixator failure occurred. The bone fusion time was 6 months, and the dynamic cervical radiography showed no instabil ity occured. At last follow-up, the neurological function was grade E in all patients. The fusion rate was 84.6% (11/13). No continuous bone bridge was seen in the joint space of 2 patients, but they achieved stabil ity. Conclusion Minimally invasive anterior transarticular screw fixation and fusion is a safe and effective procedure for treatment of atlantoaxial instabil ity.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the stability of the fixation technique for the crossed rods consisting of occipital plate and C2 bilateral lamina screws by biomechanical test.MethodsSix fresh cervical specimens were harvested and established an atlantoaxial instability model. The models were fixed with parallel rods and crossed rods after occipital plate and C2 bilateral laminae screws were implanted. The specimens were tested in the following sequence: atlantoaxial instability model (unstable model group), under parallel rods fixation (parallel fixation group), and under crossed rods fixation (cross fixation group). The range of motion (ROM) of the C0-2 segments were measured in flexion-extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation. After the test, X-ray film was taken to observe the internal fixator position.ResultsThe biomechanical test results showed that the ROMs in flexion-extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation were significantly lower in the cross fixation group and the parallel fixation group than in the unstable model group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the cross fixation group and the parallel fixation group in flexion-extension and left/right lateral bending (P>0.05). In the left/right axial rotation, the ROMs of the cross fixation group were significantly lower than those of the parallel fixation group (P<0.05). After the test, the X-ray film showed the good internal fixator position.ConclusionThe axial rotational stability of occipitocervical fusion can be further improved by crossed rods fixation when the occipital plate and C2 bilateral lamina screws are used.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for the treatment of reversible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). MethodsThe clinical data of 42 patients with reversible AAD admitted between January 2020 and June 2023 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed, of whom 23 patients were treated with computer-assisted surgery (computer group) and 19 patients were treated with Mazor X spinal robot-assisted surgery (robot group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, T value of bone mineral density, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Dysfunction Index (NDI) between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, screw implantation time, intraoperative blood loss, hand and wrist radiation exposure, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Gertzbein classification was used to evaluate the accuracy of screw implantation. JOA score and NDI were used to evaluate the function before operation, at 3 days after operation, and at last follow-up. At last follow-up, the status of screws and bone fusion were observed by neck three-dimensional CT. Results The operation time and hand and wrist radiation exposure of the computer group were significantly longer than those of the robot group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the screw implantation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 11-24 months, with an average of 19.6 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of screw implantation between the two groups (P>0.05). Except for 1 case of incision infection in the computer group, which improved after antibiotic treatment, there was no complication such as nerve and vertebral artery injury, screw loosening, or breakage in the two groups. The JOA score and NDI significantly improved in both groups at 3 days after operation and at last follow-up (P<0.05) compared to those before operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 21 patients (91.3%) in the computer group and 18 patients (94.7%) in the robot group achieved satisfactory atlantoaxial fusion, and there was no significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComputer-assisted or robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation is safe and effective, and robotic navigation shortens operation time and reduces radiation exposure.