目的 研究地佐辛＋咪达唑仑在大隐静脉射频闭合术中的镇静作用，并观察其对生命体征的影响以及不良反应的发生情况。方法 选取60例行大隐静脉射频闭合术患者，根据麻醉方式分为芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组和地佐辛＋咪达唑仑组２组，每组30例。分别监测心率（HR）、动脉血氧饱和度（SpO2）、平均动脉压（MAP），记录用药后5min和30min的镇静评分、生命体征以及术中不良反应的发生情况。结果 给药后5min和30min的镇静效果评分芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组分别为（2.95±0.14）分和（4.09±0.05）分，地佐辛＋咪达唑仑组分别为（3.16±0.09）分和（4.08±0.08）分，2组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。2组给药后5min和30min的HR、SpO2及MAP比较差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；与给药前（0min）比较，差异也无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。2组患者镇静良好，无躁动，均无一例发生呼吸抑制，仅芬太尼＋咪达唑仑组有4例发生呛咳。结论 芬太尼和地佐辛联合咪达唑仑用于大隐静脉射频消融手术患者，镇静效果良好，对生命体征影响小，但地佐辛组无呛咳，不良反应发生率更低。
ObjectiveThis study is designed to explore the indications, clinical pathway, and benefits of ultrasound-guided local anesthesia in radiofrequency endovenous obliteration (RFO) for great saphenous vein varices (GSV).MethodsA total of 350 patients diagnosed with GSV were divide into observation group (n=175) and control group (n=175). Patients in the observation group underwent local anesthesia RFO, and patients in the control group underwent intravertebral anesthesia. Comparion in the visual analogue scale pain scores (VAS) when anesthesia and after surgery, operative indexes, recovery time, satisfaction, and complications were performed.ResultsCompared with the control group, the VAS score with anesthesia time were lower (P<0.05), while in the surgery were higher (P<0.05), as well as the operative time, the first time for underground activity, normal activity time, incidences of complication of anesthesia and urinary were shorter (P<0.05), and the satisfaction rate was higher (P<0.05). There was no difference in the pain score of 12 h and 24 h after surgery, blood loss, volume of anesthetic swelling fluid, postoperative hospitalization, incidences of urinary tract infection, incisional infection, and deep vein thrombosis (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe RFO is feasible and safe after local anaesthesia. It can decrease the complication of anesthesia, that will promote the patient soon to be restored to health.